Agency, Networks, Past and Future



In this contribution, I will first draw upon the other chapters of this book to summarise what are in my opinion the essential elements of their discussion on the concept of agency and on Actor Network Theory. Then I will argue the need to come to understand the process of invention and innovation and present some ideas about why this topic has not generally been given the importance that, in my eyes, it merits. Finally, I will try and develop a perspective that might indeed help us understand the process of intention and innovation, based on some of the ideas about agency presented in this book.


Material World Scaffolding Structure Interpretive Framework Actor Network Theory Historical Trajectory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Appadurai, A., 1986, Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, pp. 3–63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atlan, H., 1992, Self-organizing Networks: Weak, Strong and Intentional. The Role of Their Underdetermination. La Nuova Critica, N.S., 19–20(1/2): 51–70.Google Scholar
  3. Borges, J.-L., 1981, Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius (Translation A. Bonner), in Ficciones, edited by A. Kerrigan, 17–37. Grove Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, B., 2003, A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callon, M., 1986, Some Elements for a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by J. Law, pp. 196–223. Sociological Review Monograph, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  6. Girard, R., 1990, Innovation and Repetition. SubStance 62/63: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gosden, C., 2004, Aesthetics, Intelligence and Emotions: Implications for Archaeology. In Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World, edited by E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden and C. Renfrew, pp. 33–43. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Harrison, S., Pile, S., and Thrift, N., editors, 2004, Patterned Ground: Entanglements of Nature and Culture. Reaktion Books, London.Google Scholar
  9. Ingold, T., 1988, Tools, Minds and Machines: An Excursion in the Philosophy of Technology. Techniques et Culture 12: 151–76.Google Scholar
  10. Kopytoff, I., 1986, The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, pp. 64–91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Latour, B., 1993, We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Malafouris, L., 2004, The Cognitive Basis of Material Engagement: Where Brain, Body and Culture Conflate. In Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World, edited by E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden and C. Renfrew, pp. 53–62. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. McGlade, J., and van der Leeuw, S.E., 1997, Archaeology and Nonlinear Dynamics: New Approaches to Long-term Change. In Archaeology: Time, Process and Structural Transformations, edited by S.E. van der Leeuw and J. McGlade, pp. 1–31. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  14. Prigogine, I., 1980, From Being to Becoming. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Searle, J.R., 1983, Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Selby, H., and El Guindi, F., 1976, Dialectics in Zapotec Thinking. In Meaning in Anthropology, edited by K.H. Basso and H.A. Selby, pp. 181–96. School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque:Google Scholar
  17. Tversky, A., and Gati, I., 1978, Studies of Similarity. In Cognition and Categorisation, edited by E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd, pp.79–98. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. Van der Leeuw, S.E., 1976, Studies in the Technology of Ancient Pottery, 2 vols., Unpublished Thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Van der Leeuw, S.E., 1980, Keramikproduktion und Keramikhandel. Methodologische Probleme Ihrer Erforschung. Luebecker Schriften zur Archaeologie und Kulturgeschichte 4:185–206.Google Scholar
  20. Van der Leeuw, S.E., 1984a, Manufacture, Trade and Use of Pottery on Negros, Philippines. In Earthenware in Asia and Africa, edited by J. Picton, pp. 326–364. Colloquies on Art and Archaeology in Asia, 12, Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, London.Google Scholar
  21. Van der Leeuw, S.E., 1984b, Dust to Dust: A Transformational View of the Ceramic Cycle. In The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology, edited by S.E. van der Leeuw and A.C. Pritchard, pp. 707–773. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  22. Van der Leeuw, S.E., 2007, Information Processing and Its Role in the Rise of the European World System. In Sustainability or Collapse?, edited by R. Costanza, L.J. Graumlich, and W. Steffen, pp. 213–241. Dahlem Workshop Reports, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Van der Leeuw, S.E., Papousek, D.A., and Coudart, A.G., 1992, Technological Traditions and Unquestioned Assumptions. Techniques et Culture 17–18: 145–173.Google Scholar
  24. van der Leeuw, S.E., and Papousek, D.A., 1992, Tradition and Innovation. In Ethnoarchéologie: Justification, Problèmes, Limites, edited by F. Audouze, A. Gallay and V. Roux, pp. 135–158. A.P.D.C.A., Antibes.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Evolution and Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUS

Personalised recommendations