Managing the Planet’s Future: Setting-Up the Structures
The assumption that humans will survive on Earth for the next 100,000 years is incompatible with our present modes of living. It implicitly requires severe changes in the way the planet is managed on the global scale. The word ‘global’ is important as it puts into focus the essential need of coordinating all means of management world wide, be they scientific, technical, environmental or political.
KeywordsKyoto Protocol Ozone Layer Peace Nobel Prize Earth Observation Satellite Earth Observation System
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
11.5 Notes and references
- Committee on Earth Observation Satellites, 2005, CEOS Earth Observation Handbook, ESA, www.eohandbook.com, p. 212.Google Scholar
- Bonnet, R.M. and Manno, V., 1994, International Cooperation in Space. The Example of the European Space Agency, Harvard University Press Publ., p. 163.Google Scholar
- ‘Lower tropospheric temperature’, Science 309, 1548–1551.Google Scholar
- Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and its Interaction with Climate Change, United Nations Environment Program, 2006 Assessment, and Twenty Questions and Answers about the Ozone Layer, a Panel Review Meeting for the 2002 ozone assessment led by W. Fahey, Les Diablerets, Switzerland, 24–28 June 2002.Google Scholar
- IPCC, 2005, IPCC/TEAP Special report: Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: Issues Related to Hydro Fluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons. Summary for policy makers, Geneva.Google Scholar
- The Exxon Mobil Company, secretly reported to support several groups that were seeking to cast doubts on the science of climate-change, issued the opinion ‘that the scientific evidence on greenhouse-gas emissions remains inconclusive and that studies must continue while tangible actions are taken to address potential impacts’. Between 1998 and 2005, Exxon Mobil has been charged by ‘The Union of Concerned Scientists’ (an independent science-based non-profit group working at securing the environment and safety, combining independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices) to have distributed some US$ 16 million to bodies dedicated to amplifying public perceptions of the scientific uncertainties over climate change. See also: ‘Exxon Mobile accused over strategy on climate change’, 2007, Nature 445, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stern Report, 2007, The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 712. The report stated that acting now would cost much less than later. It predicted that between 5% and 20% could be wiped off the global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by the beginning of next century if nothing was done, while the costs of reducing could be limited to around 1% of the global GDP each year. It proposed a global coordination, insisting on the necessity to double the research budgets in the field and to involve not only the rich nations but also the developing economies.Google Scholar
- GMES, http://www.gmes.info/157.0.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Busby, J.W., 2007, Climate Change and National Security. An Agenda for Action, Council Special Report No. 32, ISBN 978-087609-413-6, Council on Foreign Relations, p. 40.Google Scholar
- Solana, J., 2007, ‘Countering globalization’s dark side’, Europe’s World 7, 114–121. Available on line at http://www.europesworld.orgGoogle Scholar