Traffic Grooming in Next-Generation SONET/SDH Networks

  • Smita Rai
  • Biswanath Mukherjee
Part of the Optical Networks book series (OPNW)


Destination Node Optical Network Wavelength Channel Optical Transport Network Alignment Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Mukherjee, Optical WDM Networks, Springer, Optical Network Series, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Goralski, SONET/SDH, 3rd edition, McGraw Hill, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ITU-T, Recommendation G.704/Y.1303, “Generic Framing Procedure (GFP),” 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Stanley, “Making SONET Ethernet-friendly,” Lightreading report, March 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ITU-T, Recommendation G. 707, “Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH),” April 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ITU-T, Recommendation G.7042/Y.1305, “Link capacity adjustment scheme (LCAS) for virtual concatenated signals,” 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Stanley, “Next-gen SONET silicon,” Lightreading report, June 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Hills, “Next-gen SONET,” Lightreading report, May 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Zhu, J. Zhang, and B Mukherjee, “Ethernet-over-SONET (EoS) over WDM in Optical Wide-Area Networks (WANs): Benefits and Challenges,” Photonics Network Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 107–118, July 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Rai, O. Deshpande, C. Ou, and B. Mukherjee, “Reliable multi-path provisioning for high-capacity optical backbone mesh networks,” Proc., IEEE International Conference on Communications, June 2005. Extended version to appear in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 15, no. 4, August 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Ou, L. H. Sahasrabuddhe, K. Zhu, C. U. Martel, and B. Mukherjee, “Survivable virtual concatenation for data over SONET/SDH in optical transport networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 14, no. 1, Feb. 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. W. Ester, “SONET: Interconnecting rings using drop and continue,” Telephone Engineer and Management, June 1, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ITU-T Recommendation, “Interworking of SDH network protection architectures,” G.842, April 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Rai, L. Song, C. -F. Su, T. Hamada, and B. Mukherjee, “A novel provisioning framework for dual-node interconnected SONET/SDH rings,” Proc., Optical Fiber Communications, March 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. T. Doshi, S. Dravida, P. Harshavardhana, P. K. Johri, and R. Nagarajan, “Dual (SONET) ring interworking: High penalty cases and how to avoid them,” Proc., International Teletraffic Congress ITC 15, Elsevier 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. S. Trivedi, Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Bernstein, B. Rajagopala, and D. Saha, Optical Network Control: Architecture, Protocols and Standards, Addison-Wesley, July 2003.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Srivastava, S. Acharya, M. Alicherry, B. Gupta, and P. Risbood, “Differential Delay aware Routing for Ethernet over SONET/SDH,” Proc., INFOCOM’05, March 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Huang, S. Rai, and B. Mukherjee, “Survivable differential delay aware multi-service over SONET/SDH networks with virtual concatenation,” Proc., Optical Fiber Communications (OFC) Conference, March 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Smita Rai
  • Biswanath Mukherjee

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations