KeywordsDesign Process Design Space Multiobjective Optimization Design Methodology Design Team
Everyone takes the limits of his own vision for the limits of the world.
Research in microelectronic integration for wireless LANs is obviously the right way to go to obtain low-cost low-power solutions that meet business expectations for a consumer market. So, why not start designing them ad hoc, right now?
Maybe because a few questions remain, such as do we have a clear specification of what we want to obtain as a result? Do we know how we get from our expectations toward a prototype implementation or a final product? Can we repeat this process? 16 2 And finally, what does design actually mean?
Designing 17 3 as a human activity is not easily captured in a single definition, but a combination of creating or executing in a highly skilled manner, formulating a plan or devise something, and having something as goal or purpose [AHD00] seems to bring together all important aspects: each design needs a clear goal to achieve; it requires the concept of a method, path, or process that leads to this goal; and it relies on particular skills to reach the goal while staying on the intended path.
If we assume that the same design cost can be spent, then we might reduce design cost along the vertical design space exploration axis and shift it to the horizontal exploration axis. First, this requires increased efficiency in design refinement and synthesis within a particular technology or discipline. During the last years, progress has been made on this aspect. Second, horizontal exploration requires understanding and interaction between traditionally different skills, hence interdisciplinarity. Kienhuis [Kienhuis99] stated that an increase in abstraction level leads to lower exploration cost. However, he assumed the availability of efficient and sufficiently accurate behavioral models. This assumption neither does hold for analog and microwave/RF nor will be applicable for digital designs processed in nanotechnology. Also, intertechnology exploration leads to heterogeneous modeling approaches, which largely increase the complexity of horizontal design space exploration. Colwell [Colwell04] stated this as “there's always cost in tying conceptually separate functions together.” But, is there an alternative and are these functions actually conceptually separate?
This chapter is organized as follows. Section 2.1 describes design as a process. We introduce terminology and the scope of design methodologies and design technology. Section 2.2 focuses on microelectronic system design. Requirements and common approaches are described that allow the identification of areas of mature design technology and methodology gaps. Finally, we synthesize our particular design approach for WLAN. Section 2.3 analyzes the consequences of such a design flow based on different levels of crossdisciplinarity. Codesign of design technology and application is addressed in particular. Section 2.4 summarizes our findings and directs the reader to the implications of our design rationale in Chaps. 4–7.
2.1 2.1 Design
Both artists and engineers rely on creativity, rooted in knowledge, and craftsmanship, as means for innovation. In principal, they both start with a blank page and a few requirements. However, in contrast to the fine arts, design in the engineering context has become far more constrained a priori by nontechnical requirements and cost aspects [Rissone02]. The amount of constraints allows a distinction between two different design goals: the design of a new product and the design of a derivative of an existing product. The first refers to the blank page situation in which creativity and exploration is central, the latter expects a quick transition from a changed specification to an upgraded product.
Hence, the purpose of engineering design is the translation of initial requirements into a product or object with these desired properties in a predictable, efficient manner. This identifies the need to describe design as a process [Jacome96]. In contrast to the era of the renaissance engineer, where the limited amount of knowledge still allowed a single engineer to be aware of all engineering aspects, design requirements and design processes have become so complex and diverse that engineering is only viable in a team context today. A division of engineering into a large number of specializations and subdisciplines has been the result. Consequently, it becomes more and more difficult for each engineer to identify his or her role in the design process. Managing and enabling smooth transitions of design information between engineers have become the major challenge. 19 5 Lately, the immersion of application and service aspects into the design process, for example the interaction between service cost and service quality, has forced a shift from a product- and hence object-centric approach to a goal-centric approach [vanLamsweerde03]. An example is the embedding of sophisticated control into devices to meet user-specified conflicting goals such as long operation time or high-quality content in a portable. This adds environment and content awareness to the design process, making it even more complex.
We will now try to understand the design process in more detail. First, we introduce a clear terminology and structure of the design process. Next, we investigate its development, deployment, and use.
2.1.1 2.1.1 Design as a Process
Maximize the probability of success
Develop all critical design support in-house
Use only advanced, stable, and proven CAD tools
Identify major risk factors first
Clearly, this is input to but can hardly be the subject of an engineering thesis. Instead, we focus at a design process that leads us from an initial specification S to a final specification S[m] through a number m of discrete design review steps. We expect from this process that it enables a design team to maximally reach the design goal, i.e., it optimizes the use of capabilities given the initial requirements and constraints.
126.96.36.199 Requirements Specification
Positive requirements are more difficult to estimate than constraints [PageJ88]; this is obvious since constraints assume a preselection of technology from which then concrete data are available. Definition of requirements requires much more creativity.
Elicitation of primary objectives is difficult given the complexity and heterogeneity of current products [vanLamsweerde03]; conflicting objectives have become the rule, not an exception.
A requirements specification shall establish precisely what a product must do without describing how to do it. Unfortunately, distinguishing what from how is a dilemma in itself [Davis88]. The distinction is necessarily a function of perspective. Hence, requirements differ with the degree of abstraction and as the point of view changes, for example, from the designer to the user of a product.
Several approaches have emerged to deal with this problem, mainly instantiated in the field of software engineering, but largely applicable to system design in general. This ranges from general guidelines such as structured design [PageJ88], guidelines for requirements specification documents [IEEE830, IEEE1233], the unified modeling language to capture multiparadigm specifications [UML, Rumbaugh98], or the KAOS 21 7 approach in software engineering and support for automated reasoning [vanLamsweerde03].
Essentially, all these approaches treat design as an object-oriented process with a particular object instantiation as the endpoint of design. Hence, the design process is focused on managing the what-aspect. Recently, a goal-oriented view has been introduced [vanLamsweerde03]. This approach tries to embed the why-decisions in a design process. 22 8 This allows tracing back decisions in a design process.
With this initial notion of requirements specification, we can reformulate our definition of a design process as a process of deriving a complete specification, i.e., a set of properties that uniquely characterize a particular design object, starting from an initial requirements specification [Jacome96].
188.8.131.52 Design Space
The initial requirements specification implicitly defines the initial design space. Depending on the viewpoint and abstraction level at which the requirements are captured, the application design space is divided into a problem design space and a solution design space. The problem design space starts from the problem (goal) and encapsulates all possible solutions to the problem without constraints. The solution design space is a subspace of the problem design space with particular solution constraints being imposed (e.g., in terms of bounds on cost, latency, etc.). We do not focus on the problem design space in detail. Hence, from now on, the short-term design space denotes the solution design space.
Essentially, the design process aims at identifying the optimal configuration of the solution design space that meets all specifications. The optimal configuration represents a collection of entities that, based on their configuration, perform a specific set of tasks. This equals the definition of a system [Papalambros00]. Hence, the derivation of the complete specification or configuration in the design process completely defines the system.
Essentially, this represents a decision-oriented process that falls into an exploration/ optimization and a mapping/refinement step. The first allows traversal and comparison of different configurations in the design space based on requirement metrics. The second narrows down the design space based on a design decision. A design process that includes an evaluation criterion is a decision-making process. The result is an arbitrarily complex, partially ordered, sequence of generation design steps (mapping and refinement) interleaved with test and validation steps (exploration and optimization).
184.108.40.206 Design Methodology, Design Technology, and Computer-Aided Design
This definition of the design process is neither constructive nor predictive in terms of cost. Hence, we need a methodology 23 9 that establishes a quantitative and qualitative capturing of the progress in the design process, a clear sequence of preferably finite design steps of predictable complexity. Moreover, the effort in implementing and learning the methodology should result in, e.g., better, faster, or more consistent design results compared to an ad hoc approach. Essentially, a methodology must go beyond the description of a single method: it has to be general enough to be applicable in a significantly large domain, i.e., its deployment and applicability must have been evaluated. 24 10
Efficiency and reproducibility advocate the use of computerized automation techniques for those design steps that have been mathematically formalized and do not require human reasoning. This results in design technology 25 11 or tools. The degree of automation allows a differentiation between electronic design automation (EDA) and computer-aided design (CAD) tools. In practice, no formal distinction is applied but CAD emphasizes that technology only supports the designer while EDA aims at full automation of design steps. A design methodology embraces typically both techniques. The application of design tools to accommodate a particular sequencing of design steps is called a design flow or tool flow.
2.1.2 2.1.2 Application and Rationale of the Design Process
220.127.116.11 Methodology Development
As we have illustrated, the development of a methodology is itself part of the design process. This partial development, usually called method engineering, is itself driven by another process. Kumar and Welke [Kumar92] defines method engineering as a method for designing and implementing domain-specific methods. Hence, method engineering represents a so-called metamethod 26 12 with the goal of instantiating a general metaconcept into an explicit and concrete domain-specific methodology. The derivation from the generic to a particular instantiated concept is achieved through the application of additional constraints and requirements. Practical examples are the limitation to tools from a particular CAD vendor, the usage of a particular software coding style, or the experience of the design teams.
These examples show that methodology development does not necessarily result in writing your own tools. Instead, it consists of methodology selection, optional method construction, and tool selection (Fig. 2.3). Depending on requirements, an entire design methodology can be acquired from a CAD vendor along with the corresponding tools. An example is a register transfer level (RTL)-based design flow for synchronous digital designs starting from VHDL and resulting in gate-level netlists.
The textbook approach is driven by technical rationality [Schön83], i.e., the idea of reuse. This assumes that similar problems can be approached with a proven solution. However, this often excludes a formal assessment of similarity. Quite often, a number of potential techniques are selected and tried out in an ad hoc manner: this is essentially a trial-and-error method.
The contingency approach tries to classify problems into domains and reuse again domain-specific solutions [Kumar92]. The approach may result in suboptimal results due to the low granularity in classification but delivers fast results due to maximum reuse.
The method engineering approach requires an exploration and optimization strategy and hence a domain-specific development of techniques. Although a costly approach due to the method development cost, it may be the only technique to find the optimal solution in a complex constrained design space.
Obviously, these approaches can be combined at different levels of decision.
18.104.22.168 Deployment of a Design Process
An unawareness of what the in-house design methodology embraces (due to a lack of global view on the design process)
A hesitation to adopt new, disruptive design methodologies and tools
A resistance in formalizing the in-house methodology due to cost or effort
This prohibits a fast transfer or modification of the design methodology, e.g., in case of the integration of new team members or the partial change of the design flow. It also prevents the export of design methodology to third parties.
[Ciborra94] and Stolterman [Stoltermann92] have described that the case of transferring skills from a skilled designer to a less proficient one fails often due to a lack in formalization and capability of transferring know-how into methodology.
Stolterman [Stoltermann92] linked the capability of adopting disruptive new techniques to the capability of an organization for radical learning. Typically, individual designers prefer an incremental way of learning. Hence, adoption of new, disruptive methodologies cannot be delegated to individuals but requires the support of the organization to bridge development, transfer, and use phase.
In practice, new methodologies are often introduced through pilot projects in which a number of designers are trained and apply the methodology to a lightweight design project. This early feedback often allows a priori corrections and adaptations of the methodology before actual use in large projects. Note, however, that this assumes that the methodology scales adequately with the design size. This is not evident for complex system designs.
22.214.171.124 The Design Process in Use
Once the design process is used by designers, the practical application gives rise to adaptations. We can distinguish four levels of feedback (Fig. 2.3). Ranking in severity from low to high, e.g., missing coding style can be locally supported through additional clarification or training. On the contrary, missing functionality may require the overall adaptation of the design flow and involve the acquisition of different or additional tools from external sources. Only local, domain-specific know-how will allow the appropriate selection of the feedback mechanism and hence minimize the cost of adaptation of the design process.
Ideally, the initial specification should never be modified. However, limitations in the accuracy of technological estimates (e.g., updating performance/cost models when more accurate information becomes available) or nontechnical constraints (e.g., fulfilling the time-to-market constraint that may vary due to changing market interests or competition) frequently require iterative adaptations of the initial specification [Jacome96]. It is essential though to avoid changes that require fundamental changes in the design process and the underlying technology. Consequently, for the technological side, it is important to identify less trustworthy estimates as early as possible in a risk assessment step and investigate them prior to other parts.
126.96.36.199 Rationale and Conclusions
Referring to the need of a design process, we cannot end this analysis without addressing a measure for its success. Although need and success seem to be cornerstones of a design rationale, they only form part of it, mainly the reasoning component. A rationale must be seen as the sum of at least three different forms of knowledge: reason, aesthetics, and ethics. 27 13
A fundamental mistrust in new methodologies
Methods that show a simple and consistent picture of the design process appear irrational to designers. Designers evaluate their intrinsic structure and come very quickly to the conclusion that a method is not realistic enough. The designers' own complex and disparate view of the process appear to them a more attractive and pragmatic approach. Again, the fact that they cannot describe their own approach in engineering terms makes it acceptable; basically, the missing structure prevents a deep analysis and hence prevents early rejection based on facts. The result is often a fundamental, initial mistrust with new, unfamiliar methodologies.
A dilemma between art and engineering
In fact, designers have difficulties in identifying the crucial skills that characterize good design; often the only answer is through experience [Stoltermann92]. Thus, system design appears sometimes as an art. System designers themselves and even more those who develop methods would, however, if they could choose, like to change the process to be like an engineering process. This either results in uncompleted approaches to formalize design steps or the early denial of any substantial generalization and documentation of how a design process looked like.
Design granularity: Creativity vs. problem solving
Commonly, design is seen as a sequence of problem-solving steps that fix a malfunctioning reality. This impression often results from a too narrow insight of the designer toward the design process. Indeed, when assigned a small task with strict requirements without knowing why and how these requirements were derived, the designer's reaction becomes understandable. The small granularity prevents the exploitation of the designer's creativity. On the contrary, some designers may want to remain focused in their particular field of knowledge and feel overloaded by too much context. These opposing cases prevent an efficient information exchange within a design team when not addressed particularly.
An encapsulation of the entire design from requirements specification over methodology development to the actual design is obtained.
Effort invested in the requirements specification pays off in reduced iterations over the specifications and leads to a more predictable process.
Methodology is conceived as a whole from development over transfer to the actual use. The importance of local method development is crucial to the successful use of the methodology by designers.
Developing design methodology is a metaprocess that requires the instantiation of a generic idea into a specific flow on the one hand and on the other hand the generalization of a particular design solution into a reusable method.
Design has traditionally an object-oriented focus with the product as center. Newer concepts favor a goal-oriented approach that enables a traceback of design decisions.
We will come back to the rationale behind these points frequently in the following chapters, in particular in Chap. 7.
2.2 2.2 Microelectronic System Design
The goal of electronic system design is to minimize production cost, development time, and cost subject to constraints on performance and functionality of the system [Ferrari99].
Progress in IC fabrication technologies has enabled integration of complete electronic systems on a chip (SoC) or in a package (SiP) [Shen02]. This evolution toward embedded solutions is driven by the size and production cost advantage of integrated solutions and has surpassed the previous PC era as an industrial driver [Schaumont01a]. For example, in our particular case, we consider the complete integration of a wireless LAN transceiver — analog, RF, and digital, hardware and software, discrete and integrated components — using an advanced packaging technology with integrated multichip modules (MCMs) [Donnay00]. This move from general-purpose components to heterogeneous application- or domain-specific systems has been recognized by MEDEA [MEDEA02] and ITRS [Edenfeld04], which both introduced system-specific drivers, for example for wireless communications.
Hence, electronic system design moved from a board-level to a chip- or package-level approach. This also means that the task of designing and partitioning the system has moved from selecting discrete components and connecting them on a board into the microelectronics design domain. We refer to this approach as microelectronic system design. Characteristics of microelectronic system design are heterogeneous integration and performance/cost awareness.
This section is structured as follows. First, we state the challenges in microelectronic system design that come along with complexity and heterogeneity. Next, we analyze the key methodologies that have been proposed for this design domain. Finally, we synthesize a specific design methodology for our wireless LAN design case.
2.2.1 2.2.1 The Challenge of Complexity and Heterogeneity
Difficulties in merging microelectronics with system design have first been revealed in digital design. Digital design so far could benefit from technology scaling according to Moore's law [Moore65]. The result was higher performance at reduced chip size and reduced cost per function. This paved the way for the integration of more functionality onto a single chip. However, it is today clearly recognized (and addressed in detail in Chap. 6) that performance comes at a power cost, maximum performance is not always required, and hence performance can be traded against energy or peak power. Besides this performance/cost tradeoff aspect, we see that this evolution reveals the four major problems that even gain in importance when moving to a truly heterogeneous microelectronic system.
188.8.131.52 Technology vs. Design Productivity Gap
184.108.40.206 Delays and Costs Due to Complexity-Induced Functional Errors
Advancing technology allows the integration of increasing functionality onto a single chip. However, failures in SoC designs are causing a significant number of redesigns: 48% of the designs fail on first silicon, 20% still on second spin, and 5% require even more than three spins. 28 14 Failing on first-time-right silicon may lead to missing the market window and hence to a significant loss of profit. Importantly, a large number of these designs actually failed due to functional or specification errors. This reveals a test and verification gap. The yield reduces with increasing heterogeneity in the same design, such as analog and digital on a SoC or discrete and integrated RF components in a SiP. With 20% of mixed-signal SoCs today and a projection of 70% for 2006, 29 15 the severity of this problem rises dramatically. The urgency for design support in the integration of heterogeneous components is also expressed in the ITRS 2003 roadmap [Edenfeld04].
220.127.116.11 Lacking Support for Power- and Energy-Aware Design
Unfortunately, performance and power consumption in Moore's law scale at the same rate. As a consequence, thermal dissipation problems add tremendous design complexity and slow down the usage of the available chip area. Both ITRS and MEDEA identify low-power design and system power management as key challenges.
18.104.22.168 An Incoherent Marketplace for System-Level Design EDA
In 1993, the EDA industry introduced electronic system-level (ESL) design automation solutions for the first time at a large scale [Goering03]. The very diverse approach with many niche solutions such as graphical code generation, HW/SW codesign, architectural modeling, behavioral synthesis, etc., resulted in fading interest soon. ESL design obtained a bad reputation from that moment on. Around 2000, with the advent of SystemC, a similar movement started with significant EDA industry support to address high-level system modeling in C-based language styles. At the beginning of 2004, a diversification over several approaches and even a withdrawal of major EDA players from the ESL market can be observed. 30 16 Since then, we have mainly seen a HW/SW digital-driven initiative. ESL design tools for truly heterogeneous systems including analog/RF, power management, sensor/actuator support, etc., appear in 2006 to be far away from the designer's toolbox.
2.2.2 2.2.2 State of the Art in Electronic System-Level Design
Techniques for ESL design have to overcome the four problems aforementioned. For an understanding of the state of the art, we first have to introduce the concepts of function, architecture, and interface which allow the principles of hierarchy and abstraction.
A system implements a set of functions. A function is an abstract view of the behavior of the system. It is the input/output characterization of the system with respect to its environment. It has no notion of implementation associated to it. Contrary to this, we can describe an architecture that by itself has only a notion of implementation but no particular functionality. The notion of function and architecture depend on the level of abstraction. Higher abstraction levels require a partitioning of the design into visible and hidden or, equivalently, detailed and nondetailed aspects. This introduces general design principles such as hierarchical composition and the concept of interfacing to describe the interaction with a component whose content is not detailed, a so-called black-box component model.
22.214.171.124 A Chain of Dependencies
multiobjective optimization to take into account concurrent constraints on performance, power, cost, etc., which requires
horizontal design space exploration and codesign techniques to compare and validate heterogeneous design solutions; they rely on
behavioral and gray-box modeling for an efficient comparison at a manageable level of detail; this calls for
design capture, verification, and reuse at higher abstraction levels to speedup the design and improve design robustness
Obviously, the least complex tasks have been addressed first in time and have, so far, been most successful. An example is methodologies for the move of digital design to higher abstraction levels. For verification purposes at design time, a so-called silicon virtual prototype (SVP) is built. Over time, the abstraction level of this prototype has moved from the classical layout, transistor, gate level to the register transfer level [Mehrotra03, Dai03] and finally to the transaction level 31 17 [Gordon02, Schlebusch03]. Preferably, a SVP is prepared at all levels but verification of system-level features is achieved most quickly at the highest abstraction level. The design cost reduction due to reusing existing components, the so-called IP, 32 18 increases also with the abstraction level.
Further abstraction is possible through platform- and interface-based design techniques. The Y-chart approach combines separate functional and architectural specifications through a formal mapping step into an implementation [Gajski83, Ferrari99, Kienhuis99]. The separate architecture specification allows the mapping of different functionality to the same architecture, which is denoted as platform-based design [Keutzer00]. A formal separation of data manipulation into communication/transfer and computation/behavior constitutes interface-based design [VanRompaey96, Rowson97, Lennard00].
126.96.36.199 Unequal Progress Across Different Technologies
Importantly, major advances have been limited so far to the digital world. While hardware/software solutions have been elevated to the codesign level [Bolsens97], analog/RF design, despite slow but steady progress, struggles at the synthesis, reuse, and modeling steps [Chang96b, Vassiliou99, Miliozzi00, Gielen00]. As a consequence, the differences in modeling effort, model complexity, and model quality create significant problems at the codesign level. Similarly, considerable state of the art has been established for power-aware digital design techniques [Singh95, Benini99]. At the analog side, low-power design happens too but at a much slower pace and in a much less structured and automated way [Abidi00].
188.8.131.52 Lack of Techniques to Handle Multiobjective Optimization Complexity
The addition of power consumption as a major additional constraint is particularly serious for the design of wireless, portable consumer devices. The performance-driven state-of-the-art built up in the PC era cannot be reused in the domain of portable wireless devices. General-purpose off-the-shelf microprocessors (0.1 GOPS W−1) have to compete with custom-designed, far more efficient ASICs (100 GOPS W−1) spanning up a design space gap of three orders of magnitude [Claasen99]. Domain-specific architectures with the optimum tradeoff between performance/power and design cost are needed [Schaumont01a].
At the same time, well-known single-objective optimization strategies cannot handle anymore the additional concurrent constraints. Multiobjective optimization strategies have to be introduced and tailored. Moreover, adequate figures-of-merit need to be defined [Papalambros00, Allais43, Pareto06, vanLamsweerde03]. Exploration and optimization require parameterized but not entirely open white-box models. Preferably, gray-box models 33 19 are used that exhibit the relevant parameters to be optimized to the user while hiding irrelevant details [Büchi97, Melgaard94].
184.108.40.206 Lack of an Executable Specification as Starting Point
The majority of formal design approaches relies on the availability of an executable specification to apply transformation or refinement methods [Lieverse99, Kienhuis99, Catthoor98a, Catthoor98b]. Specifically in the telecommunications domain, this assumption is not met. First, standardization does not provide a complete specification, which requires an exploration of the function design space. Second, multiple concurrent constraints often force a redefinition of the application requirements to obtain an overall feasible design. Both cases require modifications of the executable specification. The problem of functional iterations has been termed algorithm selection [Potkonjak99]. It is essentially the complementary problem to the implementation platform selection. However, it has rarely been addressed in a methodic way. 34 20
2.2.3 2.2.3 Synthesis of a Future-Proof Design Methodology
The previous section indicated a significant gap between the capabilities of the current state of the art in microelectronic system design and the expectations and requirements from both a product design and process technology point of view. In fact, this situation will aggravate with the advent of next-generation multistandard multimedia communication devices. Hence, for our design flow, we neither can rely on selecting existing design methods nor should develop new methods that only fit the design of WLAN transceivers. Instead, we aim at a future-proof design methodology.
First, we stress an integrated view on design space exploration and optimization. Second, we recommend transition-aware modeling and codesign. Finally, we emphasize the importance of a comprehensive design process rationale including nontechnical factors as a measure of success.
220.127.116.11 An Integrated View on Design Space Exploration and Optimization
Efficient design solutions will employ interface- and platform-based architectural concepts together with generic, scalable functional concepts to allow adaptation to changing application scenarios. One part of this design flow will be executed by the designer at design time, while the other part, notably a subset of instance selection, change management, and optimization procedure, will be refined to an implementation which resides in the actual device for intelligent self-adaptation at run time.
The principles of design space exploration, multiobjective optimization, and design-time/run-time tradeoff will be employed throughout Chaps. 4–7.
18.104.22.168 Transition-Aware Modeling and Codesign
An efficient vertical top-down flow for digital design, its extension to mixed-signal system-level design, and behavioral modeling and gray-box techniques for scalable analog components will be presented in Chap. 7.
22.214.171.124 A Comprehensive Design Process Rationale
In 1993, a number of CAD solutions were introduced as the solution to the ESL design problem. At that time, the approach failed: ESL design became the bad notion of a buzzword and it took years more until recognizable success could be achieved [Goering03]. Our analysis of the design process reveals that the complex interplay between many contravening influences — to a large part nontechnical ones — prohibits a single design methodology or tool from solving the problem. We emphasize the difficulty of managing the design process as a whole and a systematic, horizontal design space exploration as the key enabling techniques of the future. 37 23
Since the early days, methodology and tool support for ESL design have been steadily but slowly improving. Still, most ESL tool solutions of today, e.g., the CoWare tool suite, address only a part of the embedded system design process. The main focus has been on hardware/software codesign at the digital platform level. Improvements are still required, for example, on the integration with analog/RF and on the mapping of functional code toward the platform. Hence, we live up to the rationale defined in Sect. 2.1.2 and evaluate the developed methodology in a broader, also nontechnical context. More details can be found in the conclusions of Chap. 2 and in Chap. 7.
2.3 2.3 Crossdisciplinarity
Design has been described as a structured process, yet tying together a multitude of diverse design and technology disciplines. Obviously, a unidisciplinary approach cannot provide a satisfying solution to the intrinsic diversity. We advocate a crossdisciplinary approach to design, which embeds all layers of disciplinarity. Importantly, we try to bring together the classically divided processes of designing the application and designing the design methodology and advocate for a codesign of application and methodology design. The consequences of this approach for the design process and the designers in a design team are analyzed. We stress that the codesign itself requires a transdisciplinary approach.
2.3.1 2.3.1 Disciplines
Unidisciplinarity means that representatives of individual disciplines meet, but the meeting does not affect their disciplinary identity at all; this often leads to difficulties in understanding since each discipline has its own terminology and standards for information exchange.
Multidisciplinarity states that researchers work in parallel or sequentially from a disciplinary-specific base to address a common problem. A basic requirement is that a minimum level of common terminology is established early to allow a partitioning of the common problem into subproblems with their own specifications. The limited terminology forces the use of a top-down-only approach for partitioning, which leads to a suboptimal partitioning with a high probability. In practice, collaboration is often depending on a system architect linking together team members. 38 24 An effective horizontal design space exploration is not possible.
Interdisciplinarity requires researchers to work jointly but still from a disciplinary-specific basis to address a common problem. Joint work goes further than an initial partitioning and involves a combination of top-down and bottom-up process steps. This enables design space exploration.
Transdisciplinarity assumes a shared conceptual framework, which brings together disciplinary-specific ideas and approaches to address a common problem. Consequently, an early partitioning of the problem into multiple disciplines is not required; instead, all divide and conquer strategies are available. Transdisciplinarity requires a significant multi-disciplinarity per team member to distinguish itself from an interdisciplinary approach.
Crossdisciplinarity is a term that covers multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinarity. We will not use this term since we want to stress their subtle, but important differences between them at different layers in the design process.
2.3.2 2.3.2 Consequences for the Design Process
In practice, we can often observe a clash between system and circuit designers when it comes to exchanging information about a design because of the different abstraction levels handled by default by both classes of designers. Fairly often, misunderstandings result in either wrong decisions being taken or problems not being recognized early enough. Hence, translation between abstraction levels and reasoning at various abstraction levels is an important skill for both system and circuit designers. Note that, for the circuit designer, this does not require an extension of his disciplinary scope to other disciplines.
Fig. 2.7 clearly indicates that different levels of disciplinarity are required. It also shows that systems with limited heterogeneity may not exploit capabilities at all levels.
2.3.3 2.3.3 Consequences for the Designers and Design Methodologies
Changes in the design process are reflected both in requirements for the application designers and the design methodologies applied by them.
126.96.36.199 Increased Need for Interdisciplinarity in Application Design
When we consider the particular case of wireless system design, the designers face both a complex, heterogeneous design case and a large number of conflicting design objectives. This requires a detailed horizontal design space exploration, such that a close-to-optimal solution is found. Hence, we can state an increased need for interdisciplinary methodologies and designers. This conclusion seems to be in contrast with several statements in [Bannon94] where a multidisciplinary approach for the discipline of system development is thought to be sufficient. In fact, there is no contradiction but this evolution toward interdisciplinarity reflects the steadily increasing performance/cost pressure in the wireless and consumer market [Wheeler03].
188.8.131.52 Link Between Role Models and Disciplinarity for Application Designers
Opportunities to replace designers' experience by external IP appear mainly at the unidisciplinary level. In SoC or SiP design, this was first limited to hard or soft macros or modules. The extension toward programmable platforms, e.g., embedded processors and bus systems, FPGAs, etc., reflects already a reduction of design complexity at the multidisciplinary level since these components hide partitioning decisions [Chang99].
184.108.40.206 Increased Need for Transdisciplinarity in Design Technology Development
The development of design technology has always been an interdisciplinary task. It requires knowledge in a particular application domain and, for the implementation of the design technology, in software engineering and algorithms, and digital signal processing. The move to system-level design brings multiple domains together along with their individual tool implementation knowledge. Unless embedded in a single conceptual framework, 40 26 application of methodologies and tools at the system level will become inefficient and unattractive to the designer. A transdisciplinary approach can prevent the creation of a pile of incompatible tools and, instead, provide suggestions for domain-specific design flows and hence guide the development of the essential tools and support for the relevant design step transitions. Importantly, only the combination of application-or domain-specific know-how with insight into the capabilities of design technology can produce a design process as proposed in Sect. 2.1, which truly enables a design team.
2.3.4 2.3.4 Codesign of Design Technology and Application
The heterogeneity of integrated electronic systems does not allow finding a perfect match of design tools when the design starts without limiting design creativity too much and too early in a deliberate way. While a basic set of tools, mainly at the unidisciplinary level, can be reused due to its generality, higher abstraction layers will require more dedicated approaches to efficiently define, explore, and optimize the system. Also, transitions between selected tools may not fit perfectly the desired design flow.
Traditionally, this resulted in a black-or-white decision [Schaumont01a]: The “pure design technologist” would wait for the design of the optimum tools before starting a design while the “designer-in-the-trenches” would abandon any new tool development and go for the working chip first. Both approaches are undesirable since they either result in tools that come too late for use in practical designs, or vice versa, no progress in tools ever and a nonscalable and hence unpredictable way of designing. Actually, the strong connection between application domain and suited design methodologies allows industry to turnaround this vicious circle. In-house codevelopment of application know-how and domain-specific design methodologies can lead to a competitive advantage over competitors in terms of design efficiency and hence design cost and quality. Similar to the customer-owned tooling (COT) approach at the physical design level, we may call this concurrent process a customer-owned system design process.
Consequently, we motivate a joint path for application and design technology in an integrated codesign process. The idea for the codesign of application design and design methodology is not new and has been stressed, for example, in “you have to design the [design] environment plus the chips together” [DeMan00] or “design the design system for your system” [Schaumont01a]. This work illustrates this codesign idea in an explicit transdisciplinary way, which is based on three principles. First, we start with an application goal and not with a particular design problem. Second, we develop design methodology only when it proves to be necessary to overcome a specific application design problem in the foreseen path. Third, each developed design methodology needs to be evaluated with the problem that triggered its development and at least one other example that allows conclusions about the generalization of the method.
A smooth, efficient design flow for digital VLSI design from the system to the gate level; an analysis of reuse cases demonstrates that an initial investment in design methodology pays off
An extension of this digital flow with an analog/RF component that allows mixed-signal system simulation and hence horizontal design space exploration
A methodology for design space exploration at the communications link level, at the mixed-signal system level, and at the component level, which allows a partitioning of the system complexity into a design-time and a run-time aspect
2.4 2.4 Conclusions
This chapter puts the focus on the design task itself, its implications for the designer and the design team but also for the outcome and output of the design project. Today's communications systems have become very complex and depend on close collaboration of many disciplines. The resulting design process is full of interactions and requires careful planning, observation, and steering. An important evolution complicating this process is that, beyond the continuous pressure for short design time and low design cost, performance of wireless devices must increase while energy consumption must decrease. The latter dilemma requires optimization across disciplinary boundaries to obtain the aggressive design targets. A consequence of this evolution is the move toward crossdisciplinary exploration and optimization which call for novel methodologies and tool support to ease the designers' work.
The concrete design examples in the following chapters will illustrate how we translated this methodology into practice. Chapters 4–6 are not object oriented but goal oriented and the accompanying process is driven by elimination of the major design obstacles in terms of performance and/or power. In Chap. 6, this culminates in a methodology that systematically trades off performance and energy cost in a multiobjective optimization approach. Importantly, this approach can be used early in the design process and updated later, leading to an encapsulation of requirements specification, methodology, and actual design into a single process.
In particular, Chap. 7 addresses how particular design challenges were translated into methodologies and supported by tools. There, we show how a concurrent development of design methods for digital design, mixed analog/digital codesign and modeling, and system-wide optimization results not only in an ad hoc design result but also in a generic reusable methodology that is applicable to a wider range of problems.
15 Schopenhauer's words — “Jeder Mensch hält die Grenzen der Wahrnehmung für die Grenzen der Welt.” — obviously go beyond simple perceptions of working style; but has not there always been a fight between old and new methods of accomplishing things? Schopenhauer mentions also that this often includes that new thoughts are first ridiculed, then attacked, and finally become common thinking — “Ein neuer Gedanke wird zuerst verlacht, dann bekämpft, bis er nach längerer Zeit als selbstverständlich gilt.”
16 Obviously, products are designed everyday. A fundamental question is how much experience from previous designs plays a role to reproduce a design success and whether and how some of this experience can be transferred from an experienced human designer to other designers, into a methodology, or into tools.
17 The word design has its origin in the Latin word designare which means to devise (to invent), to mark out for something.
18 A system can be defined as a set of interrelated elements perceived as a whole, performing a useful function by interaction with human or other environment. A system is composed of components, typically in a hierarchical way. The interrelation makes the system more useful than the sum of its isolated components. The system reacts to or interacts with its environment.
19 “This made me think that there is no bottom, no top, and every year more steps are added as our field gets chopped into more manageable segments. I look down the stairs [of the design process] and see them disappearing into blackness. Above me the steps ascend into fog.” [Lucky03a]
20 These are quotes originating from various microelectronics company websites.
21 KAOS, keep all objectives satisfied.
22 We can ask the question whether we need a fully formalized specification process; regarding the what-aspect, this appears useful. However, most misunderstandings are correlated with mistakes on the why-aspects, i.e., with the derivation of wrong specifications. Formalizing the why-process appears as an even more challenging task.
23 A method is a means or manner or procedure to accomplish something in a regular and systematic way [AHD00]. A methodology establishes a body of methods and principles particular to a particular domain. Interestingly, the authors also state the misuse of the term methodology as a pretentious substitute for method.
24 Reference [AHD00] states that misuse of the term methodology as a pretentious substitute in case of nongeneralizable methods has unfortunately become a widespread phenomenon.
25 Technology is the systematic treatment of an art, craft, or technique [AHD00].
26 The Greek meta means “beyond, after.” Interesting from a linguistic point of view, method stems from the Greek methodos, which is already an agglomeration of meta and hodos (the latter meaning way, journey). Thus, the word method alone addresses already the metacharacter.
27 I. Kant used the slightly different terms of cognitive powers, feeling of pleasure and displeasure, and power of desire in 1790. See also [Stoltermann92].
28 Several quotes from Cadence Design Systems, Simplex, and at the International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, March 27, 2001; based on a study of Collet International, 2000.
29 Estimate as of Cadence Design Systems, 2003.
30 M. Santarini, “Panel debates viability of ESL tools market,” EEdesign, March 5, 2004.
31 The concept of transactions actually covers a large range of abstractions and is hence not very well described. An example is the modeling of an actually time-distributed physical bus access as a single transaction with a lumped timing and energy consumption. However, we could also go further and represent several related bus accesses (a burst access) again as a single transaction. The goal of transaction level modeling is finally representing the detailed interaction by its relevant properties.
32 Intellectual property.
33 Gray-box modeling originates from system identification, e.g., Bohlin, 1984.
34 In fact, Potkonjak and Rabaey [Potkonjak99] state: “this area is currently more art than science or engineering and designers almost exclusively rely on intuition instead of accurate quantitative procedures. Very likely that this goal will remain elusive for years to come.”
35 Citing Goodman in [Wickelgren96]: “Flexible standards is an oxymoron. If it's too flexible, it's not a standard.”
36 Note that our view goes beyond the definition of system-level design as a third discipline between algorithmic exploration and implementation [Meyr01].
37 Traditionally, design space exploration and design process have rather been treated as a cost factor, although both enable a larger design space and hence are key to a better, if not to the optimal solution.
38 Unfortunately, system architects with a bird's eye view on a system-wide scale are scarce.
39 System-wide reasoning capability is hard to find since it requires a combination of broad experience and fast mental abstraction skills. The experience part may require some time in practice. Mental abstraction skills, however, can be taught and trained to some extent.
40 Note that we do not mean here what CAD vendors call an “integrated framework,” i.e., a tool suite with a common GUI, etc.
- [Abidi97]A. A. Abidi, Direct-conversion radio transceivers for digital communications, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 30(12):1399–1410, 1997Google Scholar
- [Abidi00]A. A. Abidi, G. J. Pottie, and W. J. Kaiser, Power-conscious design of wireless circuits and systems, Proc. IEEE, 88(10):1528–1545, 2000Google Scholar
- [ADSL]ITU-T G.992, Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) transceivers, July 1999Google Scholar
- [AHD00]The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2000 (http://www.bartleby.com)
- [Aiello03]G. R. Aiello and G. D. Rogerson, Ultra-wideband wireless systems, IEEE Microwave Mag., 4(2):36–47, 2003Google Scholar
- [Akansu98]A. N. Akansu, P. Duhamel, and X. Lin, Orthogonal transmultiplexers in communication: A review, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 46(4):979– 995, 1998Google Scholar
- [Alard87]M. Alard and R. Lassalle, Principles of modulation and channel coding for digital broadcasting for mobile receivers, EBU Technical Review, no. 224, pp. 168–190, August 1987Google Scholar
- [Allais43]M. F. C. Allais, A la recherché d'une discipline économique: L'économie pure. Paris: Ateliers Industria, 1943Google Scholar
- [Allen90]P. E. Allen, B. Chan, and W. M. Zuberek, Comparison of mixed analog—digital simulators, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, New Orleans, USA, May 1990, pp. 101–104Google Scholar
- [Armour00]S. Armour, A. Nix, and D. Bull, Complexity evaluation for the implementation of a pre-FFT equalizer in an OFDM receiver, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 46(3):428–437, 2000Google Scholar
- [Asbeck01]P. M. Asbeck, L. E. Larson, and I. G. Galton, Synergistic design of DSP and power amplifiers for wireless communications, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn., 49(11):2163–2169, 2001Google Scholar
- [Aue01]V. Aue, J. Kneip, M. Weiss, M. Bolle, and G. Fettweis, MATLAB based codesign framework for wireless broadband communication DSPs, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Salt Lake City, USA, May 2001, pp. 1253–1256Google Scholar
- [Baas99a]B. Baas, A low-power, high-performance, 1024-point FFT processor, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 34(3):380–387, 1999Google Scholar
- [Baas99b]B. Baas, An approach to low-power, high-performance, Fast Fourier Transform processor design, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA, February 1999Google Scholar
- [Bae94]J. Bae, V. K. Prasanna, and H. Park, Synthesis of a class of data format converters with specified delays, in Proceedings of International Conference on Application Specific Array Processors, San Francisco, USA, August 1994, pp. 283–294Google Scholar
- [Bae98]J. Bae and V. K. Prasanna, Synthesis of area efficient and high-throughput rate data format converters, IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst., 6(4):697–706, 1998Google Scholar
- [Bahai99]A. R. S. Bahai and B. R. Saltzberg, Multi-Carrier Digital Communications — Theory and Applications of OFDM. New York: Kluwer, 1999Google Scholar
- [Baltus03]P. G. M. Baltus, Efficient RF Design Methods, presented at IMEC Design Technology Seminar, 14 March 2003Google Scholar
- [Bannon94]L. Bannon, R. Keil-Slawik, and I. Wagner, eds., A Multidisciplinary Foundation for System Design and Evaluation. Germany: Schloss Dagstuhl, 1994Google Scholar
- [Bell76]T. E. Bell and T. A. Thayer, Software requirements: Are they really a problem? in Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 1976, pp. 61–68Google Scholar
- [Bello65]P. A. Bello, Selective fading limitations of the Kathryn modem and some system design considerations, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., 13(3):320–333, 1965Google Scholar
- [Benini96]L. Benini and G. De Micheli, Automatic synthesis of low-power gated-clock finite-state machines, IEEE Trans. CAD, 15(6):630–643, 1996Google Scholar
- [Benini99]L. Benini and G. De Micheli, System-level power optimization: Techniques and tools, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, San Diego, USA, August 1999, pp. 288–293Google Scholar
- [Bergland69]G. Bergland, Fast Fourier transform hardware implementations — An overview, IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., 17(2):104–108, 1969Google Scholar
- [Bertran91]E. Bertran and J. M. Palacin, Control theory applied to the design of AGC circuits, in Proceedings of Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, May 1991, pp. 60–70Google Scholar
- [Bickerstaff98]M. Bickerstaff, T. Arivoli, P. J. Ryan, N. Weste, and D. Skellern, A low-power 50-MHz FFT processor with cyclic extension and shaping filter, in Proceedings of Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, Yokohama, Japan, February 1998, pp. 335–336Google Scholar
- [Bidet95]E. Bidet, D. Castelain, C. Joanblancq, and P. Senn, A fast single-chip implementation of 8192 complex-point FFT, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 30(3):300–305, 1995Google Scholar
- [Bisdikian01]C. Bisdikian, An overview of the Bluetooth wireless technology, IEEE Commun. Mag., 39(12):86–94, 2001Google Scholar
- [Blackard93]K. L. Blackard, T. S. Rappaport, and C. W. Bostian, Measurements and models of radio frequency impulsive noise for indoor wireless communications, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 11(7):991–1001, 1993Google Scholar
- [Bolle98]M. Bolle, D. Clawin, K. Gieske, F. Hofmann, T. Mlasko, M. Ruf, and G. Spreitz, The receiver engine chip-set for digital audio broadcasting, in Proceedings of URSI International Symposium on Signals, Systems, and Electronics, Pisa, Italy, September 1998, pp. 338–342Google Scholar
- [Bolsens97]I. Bolsens, H. De Man, B. Lin, K. Van Rompaey, S. Vercauteren, and D. Verkest, Hardware/software co-design of digital telecommunication systems, Proc. IEEE, 85(3):391–418, 1997Google Scholar
- [Borel99]J. Borel, Design Automation in MEDEA: Present and Future, IEEE Micro, 19(5):71–79, 1999Google Scholar
- [Bougard03a]B. Bougard, G. Lenoir, W. Eberle, F. Catthoor, and W. Dehaene, A new approach to dynamically trade off performance and energy consumption in wireless communication systems, in Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Signal Processing System, Seoul, South Korea, August 2003, pp. 298–303Google Scholar
- [Bougard03b]B. Bougard et al., A scalable 8.7-nJ/bit 75.6-Mbit/s parallel concatenated convolutional (turbo-) CODEC, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 2003, pp. 152–153Google Scholar
- [Bougard04]B. Bougard, S. Pollin, G. Lenoir, W. Eberle, L. Van der Perre, F. Catthoor, and W. Dehaene, Modeling of energy-scalable wireless local area network transceivers, in Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communication, July 2004Google Scholar
- [Bouras03]I. Bouras et al., A digitally calibrated 5.15–5.825 GHz transceiver for 802.11a wireless LANs in 0.18 μm CMOS, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 2003, pp. 352–353Google Scholar
- [Brakensiek02]J. Brakensiek, B. Oelkrug, M. Bücker, D. Uffmann, A. Dröge, M. Darianian, and M. Otte, Software radio approach for re-configurable multi-standard radios, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, 2002, pp. 110–114Google Scholar
- [Brederlow01]R. Brederlow, W. Weber, J. Sauerer, S. Donnay, P. Wambacq, and M. Vertregt, A mixed-signal design roadmap, IEEE Des. Test Comput., 18:34–46, 2001Google Scholar
- [Brockmeyer99]E. Brockmeyer, C. Ghez, J. D'Eer, F. Catthoor, and H. De Man, Parametrizable behavioral IP module for a data-localized low-power FFT, in Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, October 1999, pp. 635–644Google Scholar
- [Bryant01]R. E. Bryant et al., Limitations and challenges of computer-aided design technology for CMOS VLSI, Proc. IEEE, 89(3):341–365, 2001Google Scholar
- [Büchi97]M. Büchi and W. Weck, A plea for grey-box components, TUCS Technical Report No. 122, Turku Centre for Computer Science, August 1997Google Scholar
- [Buck94]J. T. Buck, S. Ha, E. A. Lee, and D. G. Messerschmitt, Ptolemy: A framework for simulating and prototyping heterogeneous systems, Int. J. Comput. Simul., 4:155–182, 1994Google Scholar
- [Busson01]P. Busson, P.-O. Jouffre, P. Dautriche, F. Paillardet, and I. Telliez, A complete single-chip front-end for digital satellite broadcasting, in Proceedings of International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Los Angeles, USA, June 2001, pp. 112–113Google Scholar
- [Busson02]P. Busson et al., Satellite tuner single chip simulation with ADS (http://eesof.tm.agilent.com/pdf/st.pdf)
- [Callaway02]E. Callaway et al., Home networking with IEEE 802.15.4: A developing standard for low-rate wireless personal area networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(8):70–76, 2002Google Scholar
- [Catthoor88]F. Catthoor et al., Architectural strategies for an application-specific synchronous multiprocessor environment, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 36(2):265–284, 1988Google Scholar
- [Catthoor90]F. Catthoor, D. Lanneer, and H. De Man, Efficient microcoded processor design for fixed rate DFT and FFT, J. VLSI Signal Process., 1:287–306, 1990Google Scholar
- [Catthoor98a]F. Catthoor, S. Wuytack, E. De Greef, F. Franssen, L. Nachtergaele, and H. De Man, System-level transformations for low data transfer and storage, in Low Power CMOS Design, A. Chandrakasan and R. Brodersen, Eds. New York: IEEE, 1998, pp. 609–618Google Scholar
- [Catthoor98b]F. Catthoor, D. Verkest, and E. Brockmeyer, Proposal for unified system design meta flow in task-level and instruction-level design technology research for multi-media applications, in Proceedings of International Symposium on System Synthesis, Hsinchu, Taiwan, December 1998, pp. 89–95Google Scholar
- [Cetin97]E. Çetin, R. C. S. Morling, and I. Kale, An integrated 256-point complex FFT processor for real-time spectrum analysis and measurement, in Proceedings of Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Ottawa, Canada, May 1997, pp. 96–101Google Scholar
- [Chang69]R. W. Chang, Synthesis of band limited orthogonal signals for multichannel data transmission, Bell Syst. Techn. J., 45:1775–1796, 1969Google Scholar
- [Chang70]R. W. Chang, Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing, US Patent 3,448,455, filed November 1966, issued January 1970Google Scholar
- [Chang96b]J.-M. Chang and M. Pedram, Energy minimization using multiple supply voltages, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, Monterey, USA, August 1996, pp. 157– 162Google Scholar
- [Chang99]H. Chang, L. Cooke, M. Hunt, G. Martin, A. McNelly, and L. Todd, Surviving the SOC Revolution: A Guide to Platform-Based Design. Boston: Kluwer, 1999Google Scholar
- [Chen94]K.-C. Chen, Medium access control of wireless LANs for mobile computing, IEEE Network, 8(5):50–63, 1994Google Scholar
- [Chen99]J. Chen, D. Feng, J. Philips, and K. Kundert, Simulation and modeling of intermodulation distortion in communication circuits, in Proceedings of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, San Diego, USA, May, 1999, pp. 5–8Google Scholar
- [Chen01]J. C. Chen and J. M. Gilbert, Measured performance of 5-GHz 802.11a Wireless LAN systems, Technical Report, Atheros Communications, 27 August 2001Google Scholar
- [Chia91]S. T. S. Chia, Network architectures for supporting mobility in a Third Generation mobile system, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, September 1991, pp. 236–240Google Scholar
- [Chow91a]J. S. Chow, J. C. Tu, and J. M. Cioffi, Performance evaluation of a multichannel transceiver system for ADSL and VHDSL services, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 9(6):909–919, 1991Google Scholar
- [Chow91b]J. S. Chow, J. C. Tu, and J. M. Cioffi, A discrete multitone transceiver system for HDSL applications, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 9(6):895– 908, 1991Google Scholar
- [Ciborra94]C. Ciborra, From Thinking to Tinkering. New York: Wiley, 2004Google Scholar
- [Cimini85]L. J. Cimini, Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, IEEE Trans. Commun., 33:665–675, 1985Google Scholar
- [Claasen99]T. A. C. M. Claasen, High speed: Not the only way to exploit the intrinsic computational power of silicon, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 1999, pp. 22–25Google Scholar
- [Claessen94]A. Claessen, L. Monteban, and H. Moelard, The AT&T GIS WaveLAN air interface and protocol stack, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, September 1994, pp. 1442–1446Google Scholar
- [Clawin98]D. Clawin et al., Architecture and performance of an alternative DAB receiver chip set, in Proceedings of European Microwave Conference, October 1998, pp. 645–650Google Scholar
- [Colwell04]B. Colwell, Design fragility, IEEE Comput. Mag., 37(1):13–16, 2004Google Scholar
- [Côme00]B. Côme, R. Ness, S. Donnay, L. Van der Perre, W. Eberle, P. Wambacq, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, Impact of front-end non-idealities on bit error rate performances of WLAN—OFDM transceivers, in Proceedings of IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference, Denver, USA, September 2000, pp. 91–94Google Scholar
- [Côme04]B. Côme, D. Hauspie, G. Albasini, S. Brebels, W. De Raedt, W. Diels, W. Eberle, H. Minami, J. Ryckaert, J. Tubbax, and S. Donnay, Single-package direct-conversion receiver for 802.11a wireless LAN enhanced with fast converging digital compensation techniques, in IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Fort Worth, USA, 6–11 June 2004Google Scholar
- [Coombs99]R. Coombs and R. Steele, Introducing microcells into macrocellular networks: A case study, IEEE Trans. Commun., 47(4):568–576, 1999Google Scholar
- [CRC59]Collins Radio Co., Collins kineplex systems, in Collins Radio Company 1959 General Catalog, 1959, pp. 67–70Google Scholar
- [Crols95]J. Crols, S. Donnay, M. Steyaert, and G. Gielen, A high-level design and optimization tool for analog RF receiver front-ends, in Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), November 1995, pp. 550–553Google Scholar
- [Crols98]J. Crols and M. Steyaert, Low-IF topologies for high-performance analog front-ends of fully integrated receivers, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 45(3):269–282, 1998Google Scholar
- [Crow97]B. P. Crow, I. Widjaja, L. G. Kim, and P. T. Sakai, IEEE 802.11 wireless local area networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 35(9):116–126, 1997Google Scholar
- [Czylwik97]A. Czylwik, Comparison between adaptive OFDM and single carrier modulation with frequency domain equalization, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Phoenix, USA, 1997, pp. 865–869Google Scholar
- [d'Hainaut86]L. d'Hainaut, Interdisciplinarity in general education, in International Symposium on Interdisciplinarity in General Education, UNESCO, May 1986 (http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/31_14.pdf)
- [DAB]ETSI ETS 300 401, Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB); DAB to Mobile, Portable and Fixed Receivers, February 1995 (created: May 1992)Google Scholar
- [Daffara96]F. Daffara and O. Adami, A novel carrier recovery technique for orthogonal multicarrier systems, Eur. Trans. Telecommun., 7:323–334, 1996Google Scholar
- [Dai03]W.-J. Dai, D. Huang, C.-C. Chang, and M. Courtoy, Silicon virtual prototyping: The new cockpit for nanometer chip design, in Proceedings of Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, January 2003, pp. 635–639Google Scholar
- [Davis88]A. Davis, A taxonomy for early stages of the software development life cycle, J. Syst. Software, 8(4):297–311, 1988Google Scholar
- [Davis02]W. R. Davis et al., A design environment for high-throughput low-power dedicated signal processing systems, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 37(3):420–431, 2002Google Scholar
- [Debaillie01a]B. Debaillie, B. Côme, W. Eberle, S. Donnay, and M. Engels, Impact of front-end filters on bit error rate performances in WLAN—OFDM transceivers, in Proceedings of IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference, Boston, USA, August 2001, pp. 193–196Google Scholar
- [Debaillie01b]B. Debaillie, H. Minami, B. Côme, W. Eberle, and S. Donnay, Filter design methodology controlling the impact on bit error rate performances in WLAN—OFDM transceivers, in Proceedings of International Workshop on Multi-Carrier Spread Spectrum, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, September 2001Google Scholar
- [Debaillie02]B. Debaillie, H. Minami, B. Côme, W. Eberle, and S. Donnay, System-level filter design methodology for WLAN—OFDM transceivers, Microwave J., 45(5):268–279, 2002Google Scholar
- [DeLocht05]L. De Locht et al., Identification of contributions to nonlinear circuit behavior caused by multitone excitation, in Proceedings of ARFTG Conference, Florida, USA, November 2005, pp. 75–84Google Scholar
- [DeMan00]H. De Man, System design challenges in the post-PC era, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, Los Angeles, USA, June 2000Google Scholar
- [Deneire00a]L. Deneire, W. Eberle, M. Engels, B. Gyselinckx, S. Thoen, P. Vandenameele, and L. Van der Perre, Broadband wireless OFDM communication beyond standards, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Mobile Multimedia Systems and Applications, Delft, The Netherlands, December 2000, pp. 71–78Google Scholar
- [Deneire00b]L. Deneire, W. Eberle, M. Engels, B. Gyselinckx, S. Thoen, P. Vandenameele, and L. Van der Perre, Broadband wireless OFDM communication, Revue HF, 4:30–38, 2000Google Scholar
- [Deneire00c]L. Deneire, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, Training sequence vs. cyclic prefix — A new look on single carrier communication, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Francisco, USA, November 2000, pp. 1056–1060Google Scholar
- [Deneire03]L. Deneire, P. Vandenameele, L. Van der Perre, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, A low complexity ML channel estimator for OFDM, IEEE Trans. Commun., 51(2):135–140, 2003Google Scholar
- [Diesing94]N. Diesing, Why has industry been slow to embrace mixed analog—digital simulation tools? in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, London, UK, May 1994, pp. 269– 274Google Scholar
- [Dobrovolný01]P. Dobrovolný, P. Wambacq, G. Vandersteen, D. Hauspie, S. Donnay, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, The effective high-level modeling of a 5-GHz RF variable gain amplifier, in Proceedings of Workshop on Nonlinear Dynamics of Electronic Systems, Delft, The Netherlands, June 2001Google Scholar
- [Doelz57]M. L. Doelz, F. T. Heald, and D. L. Martin, Binary data transmission techniques for linear systems, Proc. IRE, 45:656–661, 1957Google Scholar
- [Donnay94]S. Donnay, K. Swings, G. Gielen, W. Sansen, W. Kruiskamp, and D. Leenaerts, A methodology for analog design automation in mixed-signal ASICs, in Proceedings of European Design and Test Conference, February 1994, pp. 530–534Google Scholar
- [Donnay00]S. Donnay et al., Chip-package co-design of a low-power 5-GHz RF front-end, Proc. IEEE, 88(10):1583–1597, 2000Google Scholar
- [Doufexi02]A. Doufexi, S. Armour, M. Butler, A. Nix, D. Bull, and J. McGeehan, A comparison of the HIPERLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11a wireless LAN standards, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(5):172–180, 2002Google Scholar
- [DuttaRoy99]A. Dutta-Roy, Networks for homes, IEEE Spectrum, 36(12):26–33, 1999Google Scholar
- [DVB-H]ETSI EN 302 304, Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Transmission System for Handheld Terminals (DVB-H), V1.1.1, November 2004Google Scholar
- [DVB-T]ETSI EN 300 744, Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Framing Structure, Channel Coding and Modulation for Digital Terrestrial Television, V1.4.1, January 2001 (created: February 2000)Google Scholar
- [Eberle97a]W. Eberle, Wireless LAN activities including ASIC architecture and design methodology, presented at Workshop of the Innovationskolleg Kommunikationssysteme, Dresden, Germany, December 1997Google Scholar
- [Eberle97b]W. Eberle, L. Van der Perre, B. Gyselinckx, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, Design aspects of an OFDM-based wireless LAN with regard to ASIC integration, in Proceedings of International OFDM Workshop, Braunschweig, Germany, September 1997Google Scholar
- [Eberle99a]W. Eberle, M. Badaroglu, V. Derudder, S. Thoen, P. Vandenameele, L. Van der Perre, M. Vergara, B. Gyselinckx, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, Flexible OFDM transceiver for high-speed WLAN, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 1999, pp. 2677–2681Google Scholar
- [Eberle99b]W. Eberle, L. Van der Perre, B. Gyselinckx, M. Engels, and S. Thoen, European Patent EP1030489 Multicarrier transceiver based on European Patent EP1083721, filed 1999 and granted on 6 July 2004Google Scholar
- [Eberle00a]W. Eberle, M. Badaroglu, V. Derudder, S. Thoen, P. Vandenameele, L. Van der Perre, M. Vergara, B. Gyselinckx, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, A digital 80 Mb/s OFDM transceiver IC for wireless LAN in the 5-GHz band, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 2000, pp. 74–75 and 448Google Scholar
- [Eberle00b]W. Eberle, M. Badaroglu, V. Derudder, L. Van der Perre, M. Vergara, B. Gyselinckx, M. Engels, I. Bolsens, and H. De Man, A flexible OFDM transceiver ASIC for high-speed wireless local networks, in Proceedings of International Conference on Telecommunications, Acapulco, Mexico, May 2000, pp. 1122–1128Google Scholar
- [Eberle00c]W. Eberle, L. Deneire, H. De Man, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, Automatic gain control for OFDM-based wireless burst receivers, in Proceedings of International OFDM Workshop, Hamburg, Germany, September 2000Google Scholar
- [Eberle01a]W. Eberle, V. Derudder, L. Van der Perre, G. Vanwijnsberghe, M. Vergara, L. Deneire, B. Gyselinckx, M. Engels, I. Bolsens, and H. De Man, A digital 72 Mb/s 64-QAM OFDM transceiver for 5-GHz wireless LAN in 0.18 μm CMOS, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 2001, pp. 336–337 and 462Google Scholar
- [Eberle01b]W. Eberle, V. Derudder, G. Vanwijnsberghe, M. Vergara, L. Deneire, L. Van der Perre, M. Engels, I. Bolsens, and H. De Man, 80 Mb/s QPSK and 72 Mb/s 64-QAM flexible and scalable digital OFDM transceiver ASICs for wireless local area networks in the 5-GHz band, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 36(11):1829–1838, 2001Google Scholar
- [Eberle02a]W. Eberle, J. Tubbax, B. Côme, S. Donnay, G. Gielen, and H. De Man, OFDM—WLAN receiver performance improvement using digital compensation techniques, in Proceedings of IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference, Boston, USA, August 2002, pp. 111–114Google Scholar
- [Eberle02b]W. Eberle, B. Côme, S. Donnay, G. Gielen, and H. De Man, Mixed-signal compensation techniques for low-cost 802.11a receiver front-ends, in Proceedings of Communications Design Conference, San Jose, USA, September 2002Google Scholar
- [Eberle02c]W. Eberle, Putting it all together, in Wireless OFDM Systems: How to Make Them Work? M. Engels, Ed. Boston: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 151–189Google Scholar
- [Eberle02d]W. Eberle, European Patent EP03447080.7 Device with front-end reconfiguration, based on US Patent US60/370,642 A Wireless Communication Device, filed 2002Google Scholar
- [Eberle02e]W. Eberle, Flexible devices without shipping the engineer along with it: Panel on ‘WLAN, WPAN and IP: The PACWOMAN approach’, presented at International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, Honolulu, USA, 27–30 October 2002Google Scholar
- [Eberle03]W. Eberle, G. Vandersteen, P. Wambacq, S. Donnay, G. Gielen, and H. De Man, Behavioral modeling and simulation of a mixed analog/ digital automatic gain control loop in a 5-GHz WLAN receiver, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, München, Germany, March 2003, pp. 642–647Google Scholar
- [Ebert99]J.-P. Ebert and A. Wolisz, Combined tuning of RF power and medium access control for WLANs, in Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications, November 1999, pp. 74–82Google Scholar
- [Edenfeld04]D. Edenfeld, A. B. Kahng, M. Rodgers, and Y. Zorian, 2003 technology roadmap for semiconductors, IEEE Comput. Mag., 37(1):47–56, 2004Google Scholar
- [Edfors98]O. Edfors, M. Sandell, J. J. van de Beek, S. K. Wilson, and P. O. Börjesson, OFDM channel estimation by singular value decomposition, IEEE Trans. Commun., 46(7):931–939, 1998Google Scholar
- [Eklund02]C. Eklund, R. B. Marks, K. L. Stanwood, and S. Wang, IEEE Standard 802.16: A technical overview of the WirelessMAN air interface for broadband wireless access, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(6):98–107, 2002Google Scholar
- [Elliott82]D. F. Elliott and K. R. Rao, Fast Transforms — Algorithms, Analyses, Applications. New York: Academic, 1982Google Scholar
- [Elwan98]H. O. Elwan, T. B. Tarim, and M. Ismail, A digitally controlled dB-linear CMOS AGC for low voltage mixed signal applications, in Proceedings of Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Notre Dame, USA, August 1998, pp. 423–425Google Scholar
- [Engels98]M. Engels, W. Eberle, and B. Gyselinckx, Design of a 100-Mbps wireless local area network, in Proceedings of URSI International Symposium on Signals, Systems, and Electronics, Pisa, Italy, September/October 1998, pp. 253–256Google Scholar
- [Englund97]C. Englund, Future directions of personal multimedia communication space: Multimedia over IP, Technical Report, MIT Internet & Telecoms Convergence Consortium, 15 August 1997Google Scholar
- [Favalli96]M. Favalli, L. Benini, and G. De Micheli, Design for testability of gated-clock FSMs, in Proceedings of European Design and Test Conference, Paris, France, March 1996, pp. 589–596Google Scholar
- [Ferrari99]A. Ferrari and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, System design: Traditional concepts and new paradigms, in International Conference on Computer Design, Austin, USA, pp. 2–12, October 1999Google Scholar
- [Fertner97]A. Fertner and C. Sölve, An adaptive gain control with a variable step size for use in high-speed data communication systems, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 44(11):962–966, 1997Google Scholar
- [Flament02]M. Flament, Broadband wireless OFDM systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, November 2002Google Scholar
- [Fluckiger95]F. Fluckiger, Understanding Networked Multimedia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1995Google Scholar
- [Fodor03]G. Fodor, A. Eriksson, and A. Tuoriniemi, Providing quality of service in always best connected networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(7):154–163, 2003Google Scholar
- [Fort03a]A. Fort, J.-W. Weijers, V. Derudder, W. Eberle, and A. Bourdoux, A performance and complexity comparison of auto-correlation and cross-correlation for OFDM burst synchronization, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Hong Kong, China, April 2003, pp. 341–344Google Scholar
- [Fort03b]A. Fort and W. Eberle, Synchronization and AGC proposal for IEEE 802.11a burst OFDM systems, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Francisco, USA, December 2003, pp. 1335–1338Google Scholar
- [Fujisawa03]T. Fujisawa et al., A single-chip 802.11a MAC/PHY with a 32-b RISC processor, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 38(11):2001–2009, 2003Google Scholar
- [Gajski83]D. Gajski and R. H. Kuhn, New VLSI tools, IEEE Comput., 16(2):11–14, 1983Google Scholar
- [Gardner96]F. M. Gardner and J. D. Baker, Simulation Techniques: Models of Communication Signals and Processes. New York: Wiley, 1996Google Scholar
- [Getreu90]I. E. Getreu, Behavioral modeling of analog blocks using the Saber simulator, in Proceedings of Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, August 1989, pp. 977–980Google Scholar
- [Ghosh96]M. Ghosh, Analysis of the effect of impulsive noise on MC and SC QAM systems, IEEE Trans. Commun., 44(2):145–147, 1996Google Scholar
- [Gielen00]G. Gielen and R. Rutenbar, Computer-aided design of analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits, Proc. IEEE, 88(12):1825–1854, 2000Google Scholar
- [Gielen02]G. Gielen, Modeling and analysis techniques for system-level architectural design of telecom front-ends, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn., 50(1):360–368, 2002Google Scholar
- [Givargis02]T. Givargis, F. Vahid, and J. Henkel, System-level exploration for Pareto-optimal configurations in parameterized system-on-a-chip, IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst., 10(4):416–422, 2002Google Scholar
- [Goering03]R. Goering, Show time for ESL design? EEdesign, 30 June 2003Google Scholar
- [Goffioul02]M. I. Goffioul, P. Wambacq, G. Vandersteen, and S. Donnay, Analysis of nonlinearities in RF front-end architectures using a modified Volterra series approach, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, Paris, France, March 2002, pp. 352–356Google Scholar
- [Goldberg62]B. Goldberg, Applications of statistical communications theory, in Proceedings of West Point Army Conference, 1962; reprinted in IEEE Commun. Mag., 26–33, 1981Google Scholar
- [Gordon02]R. Gordon, A silicon virtual prototype is key in achieving design closure, EE Times, 19 August 2002Google Scholar
- [Gozdecki03]J. Gozdecki, A. Jajszczyk, and R. Stankiewicz, Quality of service terminology in IP networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 41(3):153–159, 2003Google Scholar
- [Gupta01]R. Gupta and S. Rawat, The next HDL: If C++ is the answer, what was the question? in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June 2001, pp. 71–72Google Scholar
- [Gutierrez01]J. A. Gutierrez, M. Naeve, E. Callaway, M. Bourgeois, V. Mitter, and B. Heile, IEEE 802.15.4: A developing standard for low-power low-cost wireless personal area networks, IEEE Network, 15(5):12–19, 2001Google Scholar
- [Gyselinckx98]B. Gyselinckx, W. Eberle, M. Engels, C. Schurgers, S. Thoen, P. Vandenameele, and L. Van der Perre, A flexible architecture for future wireless local area networks, in Proceedings of International Conference on Telecommunications, Chalkidiki, Greece, June 1998, pp. 115–119Google Scholar
- [Gyselinckx99]B. Gyselinckx, W. Eberle, M. Engels, and M. Vergara, A 256-point FFT/IFFT for a 100 Mbit/s orthogonal frequency division multiplex modem, in Proceedings of International Conference on VLSI Design, Goa, India, January 1999Google Scholar
- [H1]ETSI ETS 300 652, HIPERLAN Type 1; Functional Specification, October 1996 (created: November 1991)Google Scholar
- [H2-MAC]ETSI ETS 101 761-1, Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN); HIPERLAN Type 2; Data Link Control (DLC) Layer; Part 1: Basic Data Transport Functions, April 2000 (created: May 1999)Google Scholar
- [H2-PHY]ETSI ETS 101 475, Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN); HIPERLAN Type 2; Physical (PHY) Layer, April 2000 (created: December 1997)Google Scholar
- [Hajimiri98]A. Hajimiri and T. Lee, A general theory of phase noise in electrical oscillators, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 33(2):179–194, 1998Google Scholar
- [Halim94]R. Y. Halim, J. Harris, M. Chadwick, T. Quan, N. Diesing, and E. MacRobbie, Mixed analog—digital simulation: The tools are here…is anyone really using them? in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May/June 1994, pp. 269–274Google Scholar
- [Harame03]D. L. Harame et al., Design automation methodology and rf/analog modeling for rf CMOS and SiGe BiCMOS technologies, IBM J. Res. Dev., 47(23):139–175, 2003Google Scholar
- [Haroun03]I. Haroun and F. Gouin, WLANs meet fiber optics — Evaluating 802.11a WLANs over fiber optics links, RF Des. Mag., 36–39, 2003Google Scholar
- [Harris96]Harris Semiconductor Corp., 1996 Wireless Communications Design Seminar Handbook, March 1996Google Scholar
- [Hashemi93]H. Hashemi, The indoor radio propagation channel, Proc. IEEE, 81(7):943–968, 1993Google Scholar
- [Hazy97]L. Hazy and M. El-Tanany, Synchronization of OFDM systems over frequency selective fading channels, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1997, pp. 2094–2098Google Scholar
- [He96]S. He and M. Torkelson, A new approach to pipeline FFT processor, in Proceedings of IEEE International Parallel Processing Symposium, Honolulu, USA, April 1996, pp. 766–770Google Scholar
- [He98]S. He and M. Torkelson, Design and implementation of a 1024-point pipeline FFT processor, in Proceedings of Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Santa Clara, USA, May 1998, pp. 131–134Google Scholar
- [Heideman84]M. T. Heideman, D. H. Johnson, and C. S. Burrus, Gauss and the history of the fast Fourier transform, IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., 1(4):14– 21, 1984Google Scholar
- [Henry02]P. S. Henry and H. Luo, WiFi: What's next? IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(12):66–72, 2002Google Scholar
- [Hirosaki81]B. Hirosaki, An orthogonally multiplexed QAM system using the Discrete Fourier Transform, IEEE Trans. Commun., 29:982–989, 1981Google Scholar
- [Hollemans94]W. Hollemans and A. Verschoor, Performance study of WaveLAN and Altair radio-LANs, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, September 1994, pp. 831–837Google Scholar
- [Honcharenko97]W. Honcharenko, J. P. Kruys, D. Y. Lee, and N. J. Shah, Broadband wireless access, IEEE Commun. Mag., 35(1):20–26, 1997Google Scholar
- [Honkasalo02]H. Honkasalo, K. Pehkonen, M. T. Niemi, and A. T. Leino, WCDMA and WLAN for 3G and beyond, IEEE Wireless Commun., 9(2):14–18, 2002Google Scholar
- [Huisken98]J. Huisken, F. van de Laar, M. Bekooij, G. Gielis, P. Gruijters, and F. Welten, A power-efficient single-chip OFDM demodulator and Channel decoder for multimedia broadcasting, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 33(11):1793–1798, 1998Google Scholar
- [Hulbert96]A. P. Hulbert, A general purpose digital demodulator for VSAT and mobile spread spectrum CDMA signal reception, in Proceedings of ESA Workshop on DSP Techniques Applied to Space Communications, Barcelona, Spain, September 1996, pp. 11.45–11.59Google Scholar
- [Huys03]R. Huys, Optimalisatie van het acquisiteproces in laagvermogen draadloze communicatiesystemen, M.S. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, May 2003Google Scholar
- [IEEE802.11a]IEEE Std. 802.11a, Amendment 1 to 802.11: High-speed physical layer in the 5-GHz band, 1999Google Scholar
- [IEEE802.11b]IEEE Std. 802.11b, Supplement to 802.11: Higher speed physical layer (PHY) extension in the 2.4-GHz band, 1999Google Scholar
- [IEEE802.11g]IEEE Std. 802.11g, Supplement to 802.11: Further higher data rate extension in the 2.4-GHz band, June 2003Google Scholar
- [IEEE802.11n]IEEE Std. 802.11n, Supplement to 802.11: Enhancements for higher throughput, draft proposal, January 2006Google Scholar
- [IEEE802.16]IEEE Std. 802.16-2004, Standard for local and metropolitan area networks Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems, 2004Google Scholar
- [IEEE802.16e]IEEE Std. 802.16E-2005, Standard for local and metropolitan area networks Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems Amendment for Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands, January 2006Google Scholar
- [IEEE830]IEEE Std. 830, Recommended practice for software requirements specifications, June 1998Google Scholar
- [IEEE1233]IEEE Std. 1233, Guide for developing system requirements specifications, 1998Google Scholar
- [Ikeda02]N. Ikeda, The spectrum as commons, RIETI 167 Discussion Paper Series 02-E002, March 2002Google Scholar
- [Jacome96]M. F. Jacome and S. W. Director, A formal basis for design process planning and management, IEEE Trans. CAD, 15(10):1197–1211, 1996Google Scholar
- [Jakes93]W. C. Jakes, Microwave Mobile Communications. New York: IEEE, 1993Google Scholar
- [Janssen96]G. J. M. Janssen, P. A. Stigter, and R. Prasad, Wideband indoor channel measurements and BER analysis of frequency selective multipath channels at 2.4, 4.75, and 11.5 GHz, IEEE Trans. Commun., 44(10):1272–1288, 1996Google Scholar
- [Jeruchim92]M. C. Jeruchim, P. Balaban, and K. S. Shanmugan, Simulation of Communication Systems. New York: Plenum, 1992Google Scholar
- [Jia00]Q.-W. Jia and G. Mathew, A novel AGC scheme for DFE read channels, IEEE Trans. Magn., 36(5):2210–2212, 2000Google Scholar
- [Johansson99]S. Johansson, D. Landström, and P. Nilsson, Silicon realization of an OFDM synchronization algorithm, in IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, 1999, pp. 319–322Google Scholar
- [Jones98]V. K. Jones and G. C. Raleigh, Channel estimation for wireless OFDM systems, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Sydney, Australia, November 1998, pp. 980–985Google Scholar
- [Kabal86]P. Kabal and B. Sayar, Performance of fixed-point FFT's: Rounding and scaling considerations, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Tokyo, Japan, March 1986, pp. 221–224Google Scholar
- [Kabulepa01]L. D. Kabulepa, M. Glesner, and T. Kella, Finite-precision analysis of an OFDM burst synchronization scheme, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Antonio, USA, November 2001, pp. 310–314Google Scholar
- [Kaleh95]G. K. Kaleh, Channel equalization for block transmission systems, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 13(1):110–121, 1995Google Scholar
- [Kalet89]I. Kalet, The multitone channel, IEEE Trans. Commun., 37(2):119–124, 1989Google Scholar
- [Kalliokulju01]J. Kalliokulju, P. Meche, M. J. Rinne, J. Vallström, P. Varshney, and S.-G. Häggman, Radio access selection for multistandard terminals, IEEE Commun. Mag., 39(10):116–124, 2001Google Scholar
- [Kandukuri02]S. Kandukuri and S. Boyd, Optimal power control in interference-limited fading wireless channels with outage-probability specifications, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 1(1):46–55, 2002Google Scholar
- [Karaoguz01]J. Karaoguz, High-rate wireless personal area networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 39(12):96–102, 2001Google Scholar
- [Keutzer00]K. Keutzer, S. Malik, A. R. Newton, J. M. Rabaey, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, System-level design: Orthogonalization of concerns and platform-based design, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aid. Des., 19(12):1523–1543, 2000Google Scholar
- [Khaled05]N. Khaled, S. Thoen, and L. Deneire, Optimizing the joint transmit and receive MMSE design using mode selection, IEEE Trans. Commun., 53(4):730–737, 2005Google Scholar
- [Khoury98]J. M. Khoury, On the design of constant settling time AGC circuits, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 45(3):283–294, 1998Google Scholar
- [Kienhuis99]A. C. J. Kienhuis, Design space exploration of stream-based dataflow architectures, Ph.D. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, January 1999Google Scholar
- [Kirsch69]A. L. Kirsch, P. R. Gray, and D. W. Hanna, Field-test results of the AN/GSC-10 (KATHRYN) digital data terminal, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., 17(2):118–128, 1969Google Scholar
- [Kneip02]J. Kneip et al., Single chip programmable baseband ASSP for 5 GHz wireless LAN applications, IEICE Trans. Electron., 85-c(2):359–367, 2002Google Scholar
- [Kumar92]K. Kumar and R. J. Welke, Methodology engineering: A proposal for situation-specific methodology construction, in Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development. New York: Wiley, 1992, pp. 257–269Google Scholar
- [Lambrette97]U. Lambrette, M. Speth, and H. Meyr, OFDM burst frequency synchronization by single carrier training data, IEEE Commun. Lett., 1(2):46–48, 1997Google Scholar
- [Lampinen00]J. Lampinen, Multiobjective nonlinear Pareto-optimization. Pre-investigation Report, Lappeenranta University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Lanschützer03]C. Lanschützer, A. Springer, L. Maurer, Z. Boos, and R. Weigel, Integrated adaptive LO leakage cancellation for W-CDMA direct upconversion transmitters, in Proceedings of IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, Philadelphia, USA, June 2003, pp. 19–22Google Scholar
- [Lansford01]J. Lansford, A. Stephens, and R. Nevo, Wi-Fi (802.11b) and Bluetooth: Enabling coexistence, IEEE Network, 15:20–27, 2001Google Scholar
- [Lee96]E. Lee and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Comparing models of computation, in Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, San Jose, USA, 1996, pp. 234–241Google Scholar
- [Leenaerts01]D. Leenaerts, G. Gielen, and R. A. Rutenbar, CAD solutions and outstanding challenges for mixed-signal and RF IC design, in Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, San Jose, USA, 4–8 November 2001, pp. 270–277Google Scholar
- [Leeson66]D. B. Leeson, A simple model of feedback oscillator noise spectrum, Proc. IEEE, 54(2):329–330, 1966Google Scholar
- [LeFloch89]B. Le Floch, R. Halbert-Lassalle, and D. Castelain, Digital sound broadcasting to mobile receivers, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 35(3):493–503, 1989Google Scholar
- [Lennard00]C. K. Lennard, P. Schaumont, G. de Jong, A. Haverinen, and P. Hardee, Standards for system-level design: Practical reality or solution in search of a question, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, Paris, France, March 2000, pp. 576–583Google Scholar
- [Lieverse99]P. Lieverse, P. van der Wolf, E. Deprettere, and K. Vissers, A methodology for architecture exploration of heterogeneous signal processing systems, in Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, Taipei, Taiwan, October 1999, pp. 181–190Google Scholar
- [Lindoff00]B. Lindoff, Using a direct conversion receiver in EDGE terminals — A new DC offset compensation algorithm, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, London, UK, September 2000, pp. 959–963Google Scholar
- [Lovrich88]A. Lovrich, G. Troullinos, and R. Chirayil, An all digital automatic gain control, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, April 1988, pp. 1734–1737Google Scholar
- [Lucky03a]R. W. Lucky, Down into darkness or up into fog, IEEE Spectrum, 40(3):76, 2003Google Scholar
- [Luise96]M. Luise and R. Reggianninni, Carrier frequency acquisition and tracking for OFDM systems, IEEE Trans. Commun., 44(11):1590–1598, 1996Google Scholar
- [Luo03]H. Luo, Z. Jiang, B.-J. Kim, N. K. Shankaranarayanan, and P. Henry, Integrating wireless LAN and cellular data for the enterprise, IEEE Internet Comput., 7(2):25–33, 2003Google Scholar
- [Malmgren96]G. Malmgren, Impact of carrier frequency offset, Doppler spread and time synchronization errors in OFDM based single frequency networks, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 1996, pp. 729–733Google Scholar
- [Mandl00]C. Mandl, M. Bacher, G. Krampl, and F. Kuttner, 0.35 μm COFDM receiver chip for DVB-T, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 2000, pp. 76–77Google Scholar
- [Mannion03]P. Mannion, Smart antenna boost IQ of WLANs, startup says, in EETimes/CommsDesign, 18 August 2003Google Scholar
- [Martone00]M. Martone, On the necessity of high performance RF front-ends in broadband wireless access employing multicarrier modulations (OFDM), in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Francisco, USA, November 2000, pp. 1407–1411Google Scholar
- [Mayaram00]K. Mayaram, D. C. Lee, S. Moinian, D. A. Rich, and J. Roychowdhury, Computer-aided circuit analysis tools for RFIC simulation: Algorithms, features, and limitations, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 47(4):274–286, 2000Google Scholar
- [McCain]D. McCain and G. Xu, Rapid prototyping for a high speed wireless local area network radio (http://ww.ednc.com/products/aptix/db/Rapid_prototype.pdf)
- [McDermott97]T. McDermott, P. Ryan, M. Shand, D. Skellern, T. Percival, and N. Weste, A wireless LAN demodulator in a Pamette: Design and experience, in Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on FPGA-Based Custom Computing Machines, Napa Valley, USA, April 1997, pp. 40–45Google Scholar
- [Medbo98]J. Medbo and P. Schramm, Channel models for HIPERLAN/2 in different indoor scenarios, ETSI EP BRAN — 3ERI085B, March 1998Google Scholar
- [Medbo99]J. Medbo, H. Hallenberg, and J.-E. Berg, Propagation characteristics at 5 GHz in typical radio-LAN scenarios, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Spring, Houston, USA, May 1999, pp. 185–189Google Scholar
- [Medbo00]J. Medbo and J.-E. Berg, Simple and accurate path loss modeling at 5 GHz in indoor environments with corridors, Proc. IEEE VTC, September 2000, pp. 30–36Google Scholar
- [MEDEA02]MEDEA+, The MEDEA+ Design Automation Roadmap, 3rd release, 2002Google Scholar
- [MEDEA05]MEDEA+, The MEDEA+ Design Automation Roadmap, 5th release, 2005Google Scholar
- [Mehrotra03]A. Mehrotra, L. van Ginneken, and Y. Trivedi, Design flow and methodology for 50M gate ASIC, in Proceedings of Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, January 2003, pp. 640–647Google Scholar
- [Mehta01]M. Mehta, N. Drew, and C. Niedermeier, Reconfigurable terminals: An overview of architectural solutions, IEEE Commun. Mag., 39(8):82–89, 2001Google Scholar
- [Melander96]J. Melander, T. Widhe, and L. Wanhammar, Design of an 128-point FFT processor for OFDM applications, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, Rhodos, Greece, October 1996, pp. 828–831Google Scholar
- [Melgaard94]H. Melgaard, Identification of physical models, Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 1994Google Scholar
- [Melsa96]P. J. W. Melsa, R. C. Younce, and C. E. Rohrs, Impulse response shortening for discrete multitone transceivers, IEEE Trans. Commun., 44(12):1662–1672, 1996Google Scholar
- [Merritt03]R. Merritt, Wi-Fi prices fall, EE Times, 29 August, 2003Google Scholar
- [Meyr98]H. Meyr, M. Moeneclay, and S. A. Fechtel, Digital Communication Receivers: Synchronization, Channel Estimation and Signal Processing. New York: Wiley, 1998Google Scholar
- [Meyr01]H. Meyr, Why we need all these MIPS in future wireless communication systems, presented at IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, Antwerp, Belgium, September 2001Google Scholar
- [Miliozzi00]P. Miliozzi, K. Kundert, K. Lampaert, P. Good, and M. Chian, A design system for RFIC: Challenges and solutions, Proc. IEEE, 88(10):1613– 1632, 2000Google Scholar
- [Minn00a]H. Minn, M. Zeng, and V. K. Bhargava, On timing offset estimation for OFDM systems, IEEE Commun. Lett., 4:242–244, 2000Google Scholar
- [Minn00b]H. Minn and V. K. Bhargava, A simple and efficient timing offset estimation for OFDM, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 2000, pp. 51–55Google Scholar
- [Minnis03]B. J. Minnis and P. A. Moore, A highly digitized multimode receiver architecture for 3G mobiles, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 52(3):637– 653, 2003Google Scholar
- [Mitola95]J. Mitola, The software radio architecture, IEEE Commun. Mag., 33(5):26–38, 1995Google Scholar
- [Mohr00]W. Mohr and W. Konhauser, Access network evolution beyond third generation mobile communications, IEEE Commun. Mag., 38(12):122– 133, 2000; also: R. Becher, M. Dillinger, M. Haardt, and W. Mohr, Broad-band wireless access and future communication networks, Proc. IEEE, 89(1):58–75, 2001Google Scholar
- [Moore65]G. E. Moore, Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, Electronics, 38(8):82–85, 1965Google Scholar
- [Moose94]P. H. Moose, A technique for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing frequency offset correction, IEEE Trans. Commun., 42(10):2908–2914, 1994Google Scholar
- [Morelli99]M. Morelli and U. Mengali, An improved frequency offset estimator for OFDM applications, IEEE Commun. Lett., 3(3):75–77, 1999Google Scholar
- [Moretti03b]G. Moretti, Tight squeeze: RF design, in EDN, 27 November 2003Google Scholar
- [Morgan75]D. R. Morgan, On discrete-time AGC amplifiers, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., 22(2):135–146, 1975Google Scholar
- [Moult98]L. Moult and J. E. Chen, The K-model: RF IC modelling for communication systems simulation, in IEE Colloquium on Analog Signal Processing, October 1998Google Scholar
- [Muller03]G. Muller, The arisal of a system architect, 25 April 2003 (www.extra.research.philips.com/natlab/sysarch)
- [MüllerW98]S. H. Müller-Weinfurtner et al., Analysis of frame and frequency synchronizer for (bursty) OFDM, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, November 1998, pp. 201–206Google Scholar
- [MüllerW01]S. H. Müller-Weinfurtner, Burst frame and frequency synchronization with a sandwich preamble, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Antonio, USA, November 2001, pp. 1366–1370Google Scholar
- [Münch00]M. Münch, B. Wurth, R. Mehra, J. Sproch, and N. When, Automating RT-level operand isolation to minimize power consumption in datapaths, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, March 2000, pp. 624–631Google Scholar
- [Murthy01]P. K. Murthy, E. G. Cohen, and S. Rowland, System Canvas: A new design environment for embedded DSP and telecommunications systems, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Hardware/ Software Codesign, Copenhagen, Denmark, April 2001, pp. 54–59Google Scholar
- [Muschallik95]C. Muschallik, Influence of RF oscillators on an OFDM signal, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 41(3):592–603, 1995Google Scholar
- [Muschallik00]C. Muschallik, Ein Beitrag zur Optimierung der Empfangbarkeit von Orthogonal-Frequency-Division-Multiplexing (OFDM) — Signalen, Ph.D. Dissertation, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany, 2000Google Scholar
- [Nakagawa03]M. Nakagawa, H. Zhang, and H. Sato, Ubiquitous homelinks based on IEEE 1394 and ultra wideband solutions, IEEE Commun. Mag., 41(4):74–82, 2003Google Scholar
- [Ness99]R. Ness, S. Thoen, L. Van der Perre, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, Interference mitigation in OFDM-based WLANs, in Proceedings of Multi-Carrier Spread Spectrum Workshop, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, September 1999Google Scholar
- [Nicolay02]T. Nicolay, Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchung eines breitbandigen, direktmischenden Empfängers unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Einsatzes von Fuzzy Logic in der Leistungsverstärkung, Ph.D. Dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- [Niemann98]R. Niemann, Hardware/Software Co-Design for Data Flow Dominated Embedded Systems. Boston: Kluwer, 1998Google Scholar
- [Note91]S. Note, W. Geurts, F. Catthoor, and H. De Man, Cathedral III: Architecture driven high-level synthesis for high throughput DSP applications, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, San Francisco, USA, June 1991, pp. 597–602Google Scholar
- [O'Brien89]J. O'Brien, J. Mather, and B. Holland, A 200 MIPS single-chip 1K FFT processor, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, pp. 166–167, 1989Google Scholar
- [Ohlson74]J. E. Ohlson, Exact dynamics of automatic gain control, IEEE Trans. Commun., 22(1):72–75, 1974Google Scholar
- [Ohr04]S. Ohr, Analog age pronounced live and well, EE Times, 18 February 2004Google Scholar
- [Ojanpera98]T. Ojanpera and R. Prasad, An overview of third-generation wireless personal communications: A European perspective, IEEE Pers. Commun., 5(6):59–65, 1998Google Scholar
- [Osgood97]K. Osgood et al., A flexible approach to 5-GHz U-NII band WLAN radio development, in Proceedings of Workshop on Applications of Radio Science, Australia, 21–23 September 1997, pp. 175–180Google Scholar
- [PageJ88]M. Page-Jones, Practical Guide to Structured Systems Design, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988Google Scholar
- [Palicot03]J. Palicot and C. Roland, A new concept for wireless reconfigurable receivers, IEEE Commun. Mag., 41(7):124–132, 2003Google Scholar
- [Panda01]P. R. Panda, SystemC — A modeling platform supporting multiple design abstractions, in Proceedings of International Symposium on System Synthesis, Montreal, Canada, September 2001, pp. 75–80Google Scholar
- [Papalambros00]P. Y. Papalambros and D. J. Wilde, Principles of Optimal Design — Modeling and Computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000Google Scholar
- [Parekh01]S. N. Parekh, Evolution of wireless home networks: The role of policymakers in a standards-based market, M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2001Google Scholar
- [Pareto06]V. Pareto, Manuale di economia politica con una introduzione alla scienza sociale. Milano: Società Editrice Libraria, 1906Google Scholar
- [Parhi92]K. K. Parhi, Systematic synthesis of DSP data format converters using life-time analysis and forward—backward register allocation, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 39(7):423–440, 1992Google Scholar
- [Pasko00]R. Paško, L. Rijnders, P. Schaumont, S. Vernalde, and D. Durackova, High-performance flexible all-digital quadrature up and down converter chip, in Proceedings of Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Orlando, USA, May 2000, pp. 43–46Google Scholar
- [Pasko02]R. Paško, S. Vernalde, and P. Schaumont, Techniques to evolve a C++ based system design language, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, Paris, France, March 2002, pp. 302– 309Google Scholar
- [Peled80]A. Peled and A. Ruiz, Frequency domain data transmission using reduced computational complexity algorithms, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Denver, USA, April 1980, pp. 964–967Google Scholar
- [Pereira01]J. M. Pereira, Reconfigurable radio: The evolving perspectives of different players, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, September/ October 2001, pp. 79–84Google Scholar
- [Perl87]J. Perl, A. Shpigel, and A. Reichman, Adaptive receiver for digital communication over HF channels, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 5(2):304– 308, 1987Google Scholar
- [Peterson96]L. Peterson and B. Davie, Computer Networks — A System Approach. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, 1996Google Scholar
- [Piaget72]J. Piaget, in Proceedings of Workshop ‘L'interdisciplinarité — Problèmes d'enseignement et de recherche dans les universités', Nice, France, September 1970 (OECD 1972), p. 144Google Scholar
- [Pollet99]T. Pollet and M. Peeters, Synchronization with DMT modulation, IEEE Commun. Mag., 37(4):80–86, 1999Google Scholar
- [Pollet00]T. Pollet, M. Peeters, M. Moonen, and L. Vandendorpe, Equalization for DMT-based broadband modems, IEEE Commun. Mag., 38(5):106–113, 2000Google Scholar
- [Potkonjak99]M. Potkonjak and J. Rabaey, Algorithm selection: A quantitative optimization-intensive approach, IEEE Trans. CAD, 18(5):524–532, 1999Google Scholar
- [Prasad99]R. Prasad, J. Schwarz DaSilva, and B. Arroyo-Fernández, Air interface access schemes for wireless communications, IEEE Commun. Mag., 37(9):104–105, 1999Google Scholar
- [Proakis95]J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 1995Google Scholar
- [Proakis96]J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996Google Scholar
- [Prodanov01]V. Prodanov, G. Palaskas, J. Glas, and V. Boccuzzi, A CMOS AGC-less IF strip for Bluetooth, in Proceedings of European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Villach, Austria, September 2001, pp. 488–491Google Scholar
- [Prophet99]G. Prophet, System-level design languages: To C or not to C? in EDN, pp. 135–146, 14 October 1999Google Scholar
- [Qu01]G. Qu, What is the limit of energy saving by dynamic voltage scaling, in Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, San Jose, USA, November 2001, pp. 560–563Google Scholar
- [Raab02]F. H. Raab et al., Power amplifiers and transmitters for RF and microwave, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn., 50(3):814–826, 2002Google Scholar
- [Rabaey96]J. M. Rabaey, Digital Integrated Circuits — A Design Perspective, 1st edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996Google Scholar
- [Raivio01]Y. Raivio, 4G — Hype or reality, in Proceedings of IEE 3G Mobile Communication Technologies Conference, March 2001, pp. 346–350Google Scholar
- [Rappaport02]T. S. Rappaport, A. Annamalai, R. M. Buehrer, and W. H. Tranter, Wireless communications: Past events and a future perspective, IEEE Commun. Mag., 50(5):148–161, 2002Google Scholar
- [Razavi97a]B. Razavi, Design considerations for direct-conversion receivers, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 44(6):428–435, 1997Google Scholar
- [Razavi97b]B. Razavi, RF Microelectronics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1997Google Scholar
- [Razavi99]B. Razavi, A 2.4 GHz CMOS receiver for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 34(10):1382–1385, 1999Google Scholar
- [Rhett02]W. Rhett Davis et al., A design environment for high-throughput, low-power dedicated signal processing systems, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, 37(3):420–431, 2002Google Scholar
- [Riezenman01]M. J. Riezenman, The rebirth of radio, IEEE Spectrum, 38(1):62–64, 2001Google Scholar
- [Rijnders00]L. Rijnders, P. Schaumont, S. Vernalde, and I. Bolsens, High-level analysis of clock regions in a C++ system description, in IEICE Trans. Fund. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. — Special Section on VLSI Design and CAD Algorithms, E83-A(12):2631–2632, 2000Google Scholar
- [Rissone02]P. Rissone and G. Cascini, Creativity as means for technical innovation, in Proceedings of SEFI Annual Conference, Firenze, Italy, September 2002Google Scholar
- [Robles01]T. Robles et al., QoS support for an all-IP system beyond 3G, IEEE Commun. Mag., 39(8):64–72, 2001Google Scholar
- [Rohling97]H. Rohling, R. Grünheid, and K. Brüninghaus, Comparison of multiple access schemes for an OFDM downlink system, in Proceedings of International Workshop on Multi-Carrier Spread Spectrum, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, April 1997Google Scholar
- [Rose01]B. Rose, Home networks: A standards perspective, IEEE Commun. Mag., 12:78–85, 2001Google Scholar
- [Rosenfield92]P. L. Rosenfield, The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences, Soc. Sci. Med., 35(11):1343–1357Google Scholar
- [Rowson97]J. A. Rowson and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Interface-based design, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, Anaheim, USA, June 1997, pp. 178–183Google Scholar
- [Rumbaugh98]J. Rumbaugh, G. Booch, and I. Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998Google Scholar
- [Ryan95]P. Ryan, T. Percival, and D. Skellern, A 16-point FFT IC for wireless communication systems, in Workshop on Applications of Radio Science (WARS) Digest, Canberra, Australia, June 1995Google Scholar
- [Ryan01]P. Ryan et al., A single chip PHY COFDM modem for IEEE 802.11a with integrated ADCs and DACs, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, 2001, pp. 338–339Google Scholar
- [Sakiyama03]K. Sakiyama, P. Schaumont, and I. Verbauwhede, Finding the best system design flow for a high-speed JPEG encoder, in Proceedings of Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, Kitakyushu, Japan, January 2003, pp. 577–578Google Scholar
- [Sakurai03]T. Sakurai, Perspectives on power-aware electronics, in IEEE Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 2003, pp. 26–29Google Scholar
- [Saleh83]A. A. M. Saleh and D. C. Cox, Improving the power-added efficiency of FET amplifiers operating with varying-envelope signals, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn., 83(1):51–56, 1983Google Scholar
- [Saleh87]A. A. M. Saleh and R. A. Valenzuela, A statistical model for multipath propagation, IEEE Trans. Sel. Areas Commun., 5(2):128–137, 1987Google Scholar
- [Saltzberg67]B. R. Salzberg, Performance of an efficient parallel data transmission system, IEEE Trans. Commun., 15(6):805–813, 1967Google Scholar
- [Sampath02]H. Sampath, S. Talwar, J. Tellado, V. Erceg, and A. Paulraj, A fourth-generation MIMO–OFDM broadband wireless system: Design, performance, and field trial results, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(9):143–149, 2002Google Scholar
- [Sampei92]S. Sampei and K. Feher, Adaptive DC-offset compensation algorithm for burst mode operated direct conversion receivers, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 1992, pp. 93–96Google Scholar
- [Saracco03]R. Saracco, Forecasting the future of information technology: How to make research investment more cost-effective? IEEE Commun. Mag., 41(12):38–45, 2003Google Scholar
- [Sari94]H. Sari, G. Karam, and I. Jeanclaude, Frequency-domain equalization of mobile radio and terrestrial broadcast channels, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Francisco, USA, November 1994, pp. 1–5Google Scholar
- [Sari95]H. Sari, G. Karam, and I. Jeanclaude, Transmission techniques for digital terrestrial TV broadcasting, IEEE Commun. Mag., 33(2):100– 109, 1995. See also comments in IEEE Commun. Mag., 33(11):22–26, 1995Google Scholar
- [Savage03]P. Savage, The perfect handheld: Dream on, IEEE Spectrum, 40(1):44– 46, 2003Google Scholar
- [Schaumont98]P. Schaumont, S. Vernalde, L. Rijnders, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, A design environment for the design of complex high-speed ASICs, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, San Francisco, USA, June 1998, pp. 315–320Google Scholar
- [Schaumont99a]P. Schaumont, R. Cmar, S. Vernalde, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, Hardware reuse at the behavioral level, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, New Orleans, USA, June 1999, pp. 784–789Google Scholar
- [Schaumont99b]P. Schaumont, R. Cmar, S. Vernalde, and M. Engels, A 10-Mb/s upstream cable modem with automatic equalization, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, New Orleans, USA, June 1999, pp. 337–340Google Scholar
- [Schaumont01a]P. Schaumont, I. Verbauwhede, and H. De Man, Post-PC systems, architectures and design challenges, presented at CANDE 2001 Workshop, Jackson Hole, USA, September 2001Google Scholar
- [Schaumont01b]P. Schaumont, I. Verbauwhede, M. Sarrafzeadeh, and K. Keutzer, A quick safari through the reconfiguration jungle, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June 2001, pp. 18–22Google Scholar
- [Schlebusch03]H.-J. Schlebusch et al., Transaction based design: Another buzzword or the solution to a design problem? in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, München, Germany, March 2003Google Scholar
- [Schmidl97]T. Schmidl and D. C. Cox, Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM, IEEE Trans. Commun., 45(12):1613–1621, 1997Google Scholar
- [Schön83][Schön83] D. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books, 1983Google Scholar
- [Schurgers02a]C. Schurgers, Energy-aware communication systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, USA, November 2002Google Scholar
- [Schurgers02b]C. Schurgers, V. Tsiatsis, S. Ganeriwal, and M. Srivastava, Optimizing sensor networks in the energy—latency—density design space, IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., 1(1):70–80, 2002Google Scholar
- [Schwanenberger03]T. Schwanenberger, M. Ipek, S. Roth, and H. Schemmann, A multi standard single-chip transceiver covering 5.15 to 5.85 GHz, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 2003, pp. 350–351Google Scholar
- [Shakkottai03]S. Shakkottai, T. S. Rappaport, and P. C. Karlsson, Cross-layer design for wireless networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 41(10):74–80, 2003Google Scholar
- [Shan88]T. J. Shan and T. Kailath, Adaptive algorithms with an automatic gain control feature, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 35(1):122–127, 1988. See also S. Karni and G. Zeng, Comments, with Reply, on ‘Adaptive algorithms with an automatic gain control feature’ by T. J. Shan and T. Kailath, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 37(7):974–975, 1990Google Scholar
- [Shen02]M. Shen, L.-R. Zheng, and H. Tenhunen, Cost and performance analysis for mixed-signal system implementation: System-on-chip or system-on-package? IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manufact., 25(4):262–272, 2002Google Scholar
- [Sheng92]S. Sheng, A. Chandrakasan, and R. W. Brodersen, A portable multimedia terminal, IEEE Commun. Mag., 30(12):64–75, 1992Google Scholar
- [Sherif02]M. H. Sherif, Intelligent homes: A new challenge in telecommunications standardization, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(1):8, 2002Google Scholar
- [Shibutani91]M. Shibutani, T. Kanai, K. Emura, and J. Namiki, Feasibility studies on an optical fiber feeder system for microcellular mobile communication systems, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, June 1991, pp. 1176–1181Google Scholar
- [Shimozawa96]M. Shimozawa, K. Kawakami, K. Itoh, A. Iida, and O. Ishida, A novel sub-harmonic pumping direct conversion receiver with high instantaneous dynamic range, in IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, San Francisco, USA, June 1996, pp. 819–822Google Scholar
- [Shiue98]M.-T. Shiue, K.-H. Huang, C.-C. Lu, C.-K. Wang, and W. I. Way, A VLSI design of dual-loop automatic gain control for dual-mode QAM/VSB CATV modem, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Monterey, USA, May/June 1998, pp. 490–493Google Scholar
- [Siegmund01]R. Siegmund and D. Müller, SystemCSV: An extension of SystemC for mixed multi-level communication modeling and interface-based system design, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, München, Germany, March 2001, pp. 26–32Google Scholar
- [Siegmund02]R. Siegmund and D. Müller, Automatic synthesis of communication controller hardware from protocol specifications, IEEE Des. Test Comput., 19(4):84–95, 2002Google Scholar
- [Simoens02]S. Simoens, M. de Courville, F. Bourzeix, and P. de Champs, New I/Q imbalance modeling and compensation in OFDM systems with frequency offset, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, Lisboa, Portugal, September 2002, pp. 561–566Google Scholar
- [Singh95]D. Singh et al., Power conscious CAD tools and methodologies: A perspective, Proc. IEEE, 83(4):570–594, 1995Google Scholar
- [Sinyanskiy98]V. Sinyanskiy, J. Cukier, A. Davidson, and T. Poon, Front-end of a digital ATV receiver, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 44(3):817–822, 1998Google Scholar
- [Skellern97]D. J. Skellern et al., A high-speed wireless LAN, IEEE Micro, 17(1):40–47, 1997Google Scholar
- [Smith97]P. J. Smith, M. Shafi, and H. Gao, Quick simulation: A review of importance sampling techniques in communications systems, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 15(4):597–613, 1997Google Scholar
- [Smulders02]P. Smulders, Exploiting the 60-GHz band for local wireless multimedia access: Prospects and future directions, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(1):140–147, 2002Google Scholar
- [Sony99]Sony International Europe, Preamble structures for Hiperlan type 2 systems, ETSI BRAN, Technical Report, HL13SON1a, 1999Google Scholar
- [Souza03]C. Souza, Intersil, a leading WLAN chip player, exits a market ripe for consolidation, in EE Times, 22 July 2003Google Scholar
- [Sperling03]E. Sperling, Is Moore's law irrelevant? in Electronic News, 14 August 2003Google Scholar
- [Speth97]M. Speth, F. Classen, and H. Meyr, Frame synchronization in OFDM systems in frequency selective fading channels, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Phoenix, USA, May 1997, pp. 1807–1811Google Scholar
- [Speth98]M. Speth, D. Daecke, and H. Meyr, Minimum overhead burst synchronization for OFDM-based broadband transmission, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Sydney, Australia, November 1998, pp. 2777–2782Google Scholar
- [Speth01]M. Speth, S. A. Fechtel, G. Fock, and H. Meyr, Optimum receiver design for OFDM-based broadband transmission: Part II, IEEE Trans. Commun., 49(4):571–578, 2001Google Scholar
- [SRC00]Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC), Research needs for mixed-signal technologies. Report of the 2000 Mixed-Signal Task Force, 25 October 2000Google Scholar
- [Srikanteswara03]S. Srikanteswara, R. C. Palat, J. H. Reed, and P. Athanas, An overview of configurable computing machines for software radio handsets, IEEE Commun. Mag., 41(7):134–141, 2003Google Scholar
- [Stantchev99]B. Stantchev and G. Fettweis, Optimum frame synchronization for orthogonal FSK in flat fading channels and one burst application, Proc. IEEE WCNC, September 1999, pp. 1070–1074Google Scholar
- [Steele00]R. Steele, Beyond 3G, in Proceedings of IEEE International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications, 2000, pp. 1–7Google Scholar
- [Stoltermann92]E. Stolterman, How system designers think — About design and methods, Scand. J. Inform. Syst., 4:137–150, 1992Google Scholar
- [Struhsaker03]T. Struhsaker, Trends in WLAN silicon integration, panel on Key technologies enabling success of Wi-Fi public access networks, presented at IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, New Orleans, USA, March 2003Google Scholar
- [Swartzlander84]E. Swartzlander and G. Hallnor, High speed FFT processor implementation, in Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on VLSI Signal Processing, November 1984, pp. 27–34Google Scholar
- [SystemC]The Open SystemC Initiative (OSCI) (http://www.systemc.org)
- [Taura96]K. Taura, M. Tsujishita, M. Takeda, H. Kato, M. Ishida, and Y. Ishida, A digital audio broadcasting (DAB) receiver, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 42(3):322–327, 1996Google Scholar
- [Teger02]S. Teger and D. J. Waks, End-user perspectives on home networking, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(4):114–119, 2002Google Scholar
- [Tellado99]J. Tellado-Mourelo, Peak to average power reduction for multicarrier modulation, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, USA, September 1999Google Scholar
- [Thoen02a]S. Thoen, Transmit optimization for OFDM/SDMA-based wireless local area networks, Ph.D. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, May 2002Google Scholar
- [Thoen02b]S. Thoen, L. Van der Perre, and M. Engels, Modeling the channel time-variance for fixed wireless communications, IEEE Commun. Lett., 6(8):331–333, 2002Google Scholar
- [Thomson02]J. Thomson et al., An integrated 802.11a baseband and MAC processor, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, 2002, pp. 126–127Google Scholar
- [Tolvanen98]J.-P. Tolvanen, Incremental method engineering with modeling tools, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, 1998Google Scholar
- [Trân-Thông76][Trân-Thông76] Trân-Thông and B. Liu, Fixed-point fast Fourier transform error analysis, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 24(6):563–573, 1976Google Scholar
- [Truman98]T. E. Truman, T. Pering, R. Doering, and R. W. Brodersen, The InfoPad multimedia terminal: A portable device for wireless information access, IEEE Trans. Comput., 47(10):1073–1087, 1998Google Scholar
- [Tubbax04]J. Tubbax, A digital approach to low-cost low-power broadband radios, Ph.D. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, April 2004Google Scholar
- [Tufvesson99]F. Tufvesson, O. Edfors, and M. Faulkner, Time and frequency synchronization for OFDM using PN-sequence preambles, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1999, pp. 2203–2207Google Scholar
- [UML]OMG, Unified Modeling Language (http://www.omg.org/uml)
- [Vanassche01]P. Vanassche, G. Gielen, and W. Sansen, Efficient time-domain simulation of telecom front-ends using a complex damped exponential signal model, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE) Conference, March 2001, pp. 169–175Google Scholar
- [vandeBeek95]J. J. van de Beek, O. Edfors, M. Sandell, S. K. Wilson, and P. O. Börjesson, On channel estimation in OFDM systems, in Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Chicago, USA, 1995, pp. 815–819Google Scholar
- [Vandenameele00]P. Vandenameele, Space division multiple access for wireless local area networks, Ph.D. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, October 2000Google Scholar
- [VanderPerre98]L. Van der Perre, S. Thoen, P. Vandenameele, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, Adaptive loading strategy for a high speed OFDM-based WLAN, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference, Sydney, Australia, November 1998, pp. 1936–1940Google Scholar
- [Vandersteen00]G. Vandersteen et al., A methodology for efficient high-level dataflow simulation of mixed-signal front-ends of digital telecom transceivers, in Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, Los Angeles, USA, June 2000, pp. 440–445Google Scholar
- [Vandersteen01]G. Vandersteen, P. Wambacq, S. Donnay, W. Eberle, and Y. Rolain, FAST — An efficient high-level dataflow simulator of mixed-signal front-ends of digital telecom transceivers, in Low-Power Design Techniques and CAD Tools for Analog and RF Integrated Circuits, P. Wambacq, G. Gielen, and J. Gerrits, Eds. Boston: Kluwer, 2001, pp. 43–59Google Scholar
- [VanDriessche03]J. Van Driessche, G. Cantone, W. Eberle, B. Côme, and S. Donnay, Transmitter cost/efficiency exploration for 5-GHz WLAN, in Proceedings of IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference, Boston, USA, August 2003, pp. 35–38Google Scholar
- [vanLamsweerde00]A. van Lamsweerde, Requirements engineering in the year 00: A research perspective, in Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, June 2000Google Scholar
- [vanLamsweerde03]A. van Lamsweerde and E. Letier, From object orientation to goal orientation: A paradigm shift for requirements engineering, in Proceedings of Workshop on Radical Innovations of Software and Systems Engineering, Venice, Italy, 2003Google Scholar
- [Vanmeerbeeck01]G. Vanmeerbeeck, P. Schaumont, S. Vernalde, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, Hardware/software partitioning of embedded system in OCAPI-xl, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Hardware/Software Codesign, April 2001, pp. 30–35Google Scholar
- [vanNee99]R. van Nee, G. Awater, M. Morikura, H. Takanashi, M. Webster, and K. W. Halford, New high-rate wireless LAN standards, IEEE Commun. Mag., 37(12):82–88, 1999Google Scholar
- [VanRompaey96]K. Van Rompaey, D. Verkest, I. Bolsens, and H. De Man, CoWare — A design environment for heterogeneous hardware/software systems, in Proceedings of European Design Automation Conference, September 1996, pp. 252–257Google Scholar
- [Vassiliou99]I. Vassiliou, Design methodologies for RF and mixed-signal systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, USA, 1999Google Scholar
- [Veithen99]D. Veithen et al., A 70 Mb/s variable-rate DMT-based modem for VSDL, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest, San Francisco, USA, February 1999, pp. 248–249Google Scholar
- [Velez02]F. J. Velez and L. M. Correia, Mobile broadband services: Classification, characterization, and deployment scenarios, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40(4):142–150, 2002Google Scholar
- [Vergara98a]M. Vergara, M. Strum, W. Eberle, and B. Gyselinckx, A 195 kFFT/s 256-point high performance FFT/IFFT processor for OFDM applications, in Proceedings of SBT/IEEE International Telecommunications Symposium, São Paulo, Brazil, August 1998, pp. 273–278Google Scholar
- [Vergara98b]M. Vergara, Projeto de uma macro-célula FFT/IFFT para aplicações sem fio, M.S. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, 1998Google Scholar
- [Verilog]IEEE Std. 1364–1995, Verilog Language, 1995 168Google Scholar
- [Verkest00]D. Verkest, J. Kunkel, and F. Schirrmeister, System level design using C++, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, Paris, France, March 2000, pp. 74–81Google Scholar
- [Verkest01a]D. Verkest, W. Eberle, P. Schaumont, B. Gyselinckx, and S. Vernalde, C++ based system design of a 72 Mb/s OFDM transceiver for wireless LAN, in Proceedings of Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, San Diego, USA, May 2001, pp. 433–439Google Scholar
- [Vermeulen00]F. Vermeulen, F. Catthoor, D. Verkest, and H. De Man, Formalized three-layer system-level model and reuse methodology for embedded data-dominated applications, IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst., 8(2):207–216, 2000Google Scholar
- [Vermeulen02]F. Vermeulen, Reuse of system-level design components in data-dominated digital systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, December 2002Google Scholar
- [Vernalde99]S. Vernalde, P. Schaumont, and I. Bolsens, An object-oriented programming approach for hardware design, in Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Workshop on VLSI, Orlando, USA, April 1999, pp. 68–73Google Scholar
- [VHDL]IEEE Std. 1076-1993, VHDL Language, 1993 168Google Scholar
- [Victor60]W. K. Victor and M. H. Brockman, The application of linear servo theory to the design of AGC loops, Proc. IRE, 48:234–238, 1960Google Scholar
- [Walker94]S. Walker, A high speed feed forward pseudo automatic gain control circuit for an amplifier cascade, in IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, San Diego, USA, May 1994, pp. 941– 944Google Scholar
- [Walzman73]T. Walzman and M. Schwartz, Automatic equalization using the discrete frequency domain, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 19(1):59–68, 1973Google Scholar
- [Wambacq98]P. Wambacq and W. M. Sansen, Distortion Analysis of Analog Integrated Circuits. Boston: Kluwer, 1998Google Scholar
- [Wambacq00]P. Wambacq, P. Dobrovolný, S. Donnay, M. Engels, and I. Bolsens, Compact modeling of nonlinear distortion in analog communication circuits, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, Paris, France, March 2000, pp. 350–354Google Scholar
- [Wambacq01]P. Wambacq, G. Vandersteen, J. Phillips, J. Roychowdhury, W. Eberle, B. Yang, D. Long, and A. Demir, CAD for RF circuits, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, München, Germany, March 2001, pp. 520–526Google Scholar
- [Wambacq02a]P. Wambacq, G. Vandersteen, P. Dobrovolny, M. Goffioul, W. Eberle, M. Badaroglu, and S. Donnay, High-level simulation and modeling tools for mixed-signal front-ends of wireless systems, in Proceedings of Workshop on Advances in Analog Circuit Design (AACD), Spa, Belgium, March 2002Google Scholar
- [Wambacq02b]P. Wambacq, G. Vandersteen. P. Dobrovolny, M. Goffioul, W. Eberle, M. Badaroglu, and S. Donnay, High-level simulation and modeling tools for mixed-signal front-ends of wireless systems, in Analog Circuit Design: Structured Mixed-Mode Design, Multi-Bit Sigma Delta Converters, Short Range RF Circuits, M. Steyaert, A. H. M. van Roermund, J. H. Huijsing, Eds. Boston: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 77–94Google Scholar
- [Wang89]P. C. Wang and C. R. Ward, A software AGC scheme for integrated communication receivers, in Proceedings of IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1989, pp. 2085–2091Google Scholar
- [Weinstein71]S. B. Weinstein and P. M. Ebert, Data transmission by frequency division multiplexing using the Discrete Fourier Transform, IEEE Trans. Commun., 19(5):628–634, 1971Google Scholar
- [Weiser91]M. Weiser, The computer for the 21st century, Sci. Am., 265(3):94–104, 1991Google Scholar
- [Weste97]N. Weste et al., A 50-MHz 16-point FFT processor for WLAN applications, in Proceedings of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Santa Clara, USA, May 1997, pp. 457–460Google Scholar
- [Wheeler03]B. Wheeler and L. Gwennap, A Guide to Wireless LAN Chip Sets, 1st edition. Sunnyvale, CA: The Linley Group, 2003Google Scholar
- [Wickelgren96]I. J. Wickelgren, Local area networks go wireless, IEEE Spectrum, 33(9):34–40, 1996Google Scholar
- [Wiesler01]A. Wiesler, Parametergesteuertes Software Radio für Mobilfunk-systeme, Ph.D. Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Germany, May 2001Google Scholar
- [Williams03]R. Williams, Improving efficiency when detecting WLAN preambles, in CommsDesign, 18 November 2003 (http://www.commsdesign.com/story/OEG20031118S0024)
- [Wittmann03]R. Wittmann, J. Hartung, H.-J. Wassener, G. Tränkle, and M. Schröter, Hot topic session: RF design technology for highly integrated communication systems, in Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, Munich, Germany, 2003, pp. 842–847Google Scholar
- [Wojituk05]J. Wojituk, Analysis of frequency conversion for M-QAM and M-PSK modems, Dissertation, Chalmers Univ. of Tech., June 2005Google Scholar
- [Wouters02b]M. Wouters, G. Vanwijnsberghe, P. Van Wesemael, T. Huybrechts, and S. Thoen, Real-time implementation on FPGA of an OFDM based wireless LAN modem extended with adaptive loading, in Proceedings of European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Firenze, Italy, September 2002, pp. 531–534Google Scholar
- [Yang00]B. Yang, K. Letaief, R. Cheng, and C. Zhigang, Timing recovery for OFDM transmission, IEEE J. Sel. Areas in Commun., 18(11):2278– 2291, 2000Google Scholar
- [Yee01]D. G. W. Yee, A design methodology for highly-integrated low-power receivers for wireless communications, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, USA, Spring 2001Google Scholar
- [Yeh01]W. C. Yeh, Arithmetic module design and its application to FFT, Ph.D. Dissertation, National Chiao-Tung University, China, October 2001Google Scholar
- [Yun99]K. Y. Yun and A. E. Dooply, Pausible clocking-based heterogeneous systems, IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst., 7(4):482–488, 1999Google Scholar
- [Zander00]J. Zander, Trends in resource management future wireless networks, in Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Chicago, USA, September 2000, pp. 159–163Google Scholar
- [Zargari02]M. Zargari et al., A 5-GHz CMOS transceiver for IEEE 802.11a wireless LAN systems, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 37(12):1688– 1694, 2002Google Scholar
- [Zhang01]N. Zhang, Algorithm/architecture co-design for wireless communications systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, USA, Fall 2001Google Scholar
- [Zhao03]J. Zhao, Z. Guo, and W. Zhu, Power efficiency in IEEE 802.11a WLAN with cross-layer adaptation, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, May 2003, pp. 2030– 2034Google Scholar
- [Zhou02]S. Zhou, G. B. Giannakis, and C. Le Martret, Chip-interleaved block-spread code division multiple access, IEEE Trans. Commun., 50(2):235–248, 2002Google Scholar
- [Zimmerman67]M. S. Zimmerman and A. L. Kirsch, The AN/GSC-10 (KATHRYN) variable rate data modem for HF radio, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., 15(2):197–204, 1967Google Scholar
- [Zimmermann99]T. G. Zimmermann, Wireless networked digital devices: A new paradigm for computing and communication, IBM Syst. J., 38:566–574, 1999Google Scholar
- [Zuberek92]W. M. Zuberek, Flexible circuit simulation with mixed-domain and mixed-mode applications, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, San Diego, USA, May 1992, pp. 81–84Google Scholar