Advertisement

Democratization and Violence: European and International Perspectives

  • Susanne Karstedt

Abstract

It is a startling fact that when in the mid-80s a ‘third wave’ of democracy took hold in Latin America and Eastern Europe, both democracy and violence were simultaneously on the rise worldwide. Almost by definition democracies represent an institutionalized framework and a way of life that ensures non-violent means to share power between communities of people with widely differing values and beliefs. As Keane (2004) points out, ‘violence is anathema to [democracy’s] spirit and substance’ (p. 1). Accordingly, the process of democratization was accompanied by expectations that violence would generally decrease, and that these countries would embark on a process of reducing levels of violence as Western European countries had done earlier in the 19th and 20th century.

Keywords

Social Capital Civil Society Violent Crime Democratic Society Homicide Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caldeira, T. P. R. & Holston, J. (1999). Democracy and Violence in Brazil. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41, 691–729.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, D. (2001). Chasing The Red, The White And The Blue: A Journey In Tocqueville’s Footsteps Through Contemporary America. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  3. Davis Rodriguez, C. (2006). Civil Democracy, Perceived Risk and Insecurity in Brazil: an Extension of the Systemic Social Control Model. In S. Karstedt & G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, Crime and Justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 605, 242–263.Google Scholar
  4. Eisner, M. (1997). Das Ende der zivilisierten Stadt. Die Auswirkungen von Modernisierung und urbaner Krise auf Gewaltdelinquenz. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  5. Eisner, M. (2001). Modernization, Self-Control and Lethal Violence. The Long-Term Dynamics of European Homicide Rates in Theoretical Perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 618–638.Google Scholar
  6. Eisner, M. (2003). Long-Term Historical Trends in Violent Crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime And Justice. An Annual Review of Research, 30, 83–142.Google Scholar
  7. Elster, J. (Ed.) (1999). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ewald, U. (2000). Criminal Victimization and Social Adaptation in Modernity: Fear of Crime and Risk Perception in the New Germany. In T. Hope & R. Sparks (Eds.), Crime, Risk And Insecurity: Law And Order In Everyday Life And Political Discourse (pp. 197–219). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Gellner, E. (1994). Conditions Of Liberty: Civil Society and its Rivals. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Gibson, J. L. & Duch, R. M. (1994). Postmaterialism and the Emerging Soviet Democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 5–39.Google Scholar
  11. Gurr, T. R. (1993). Minorities at risk. A global view of ethnopolitical conflicts. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  12. Gurr, T. R. (2000). People versus states. Minorities at risk in the new century. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  13. Hagan, J. & Radoeva, D. (1998). Both too Much and too Little: From Elite to Street Crime in the Transformation of the Czech Republic. Crime, Law & Social Change, 28, 195–211.Google Scholar
  14. Hagan, J., Hefler, G., Classen, G., Boehnke, K. & Merkens, H. (1998). Subterrenean Sources of Subcultural Delinquency Beyond The American Dream. Criminology, 36, 309–342.Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, S. (1993). The Anatomy Of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Huggins, M., Haritos-Fatouros, M. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). Violence Workers: Police Torturers And Murderers Reconstruct Brazilian Atrocities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Inkeles, A. (1993). On Measuring Democracy. Its Consequences And Concomitants. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Jaggers, K. & Gurr, T. (1995). Tracking Democracy’s Third Wave with the Polity III Data. Journal of Peace Research, 32, 469–482.Google Scholar
  21. Karstedt, S. (1999). Social Transformation and Crime: A Crisis of Deregulation. In M. Krygier & A. Czarnota (Eds.), The Rule of Law After Communism. Problems and Prospects in East-Central Europe (pp. 308–326). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Karstedt, S. (2001). Die moralische Staerke schwacher Bindungen: Individualismus und Gewalt im Kulturvergleich, Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 84, 226–243.Google Scholar
  23. Karstedt, S. (2003). Legacies of a Culture of Inequality: The Janus Face of Crime in Post-Communist Countries. Crime, Law and Social Change, 40, 295–320.Google Scholar
  24. Karstedt, S, (2005). Individualisme et Violence: Modernisation Extrême ou Re-Traditionalisation de la Société? Une Comparaison Interculturelle. Déviance et Société, 29, 273–284.Google Scholar
  25. Karstedt, S. (2006). Democracy, values and violence: Paradoxes, tensions and comparative advantages of liberal inclusion. In S. Karstedt and G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, Crime and Justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 605, 50–81.Google Scholar
  26. Keane, J. (2004). Violence and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kharkhordin, O. (1999). The collective and the individual in Russia: A study of practice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Klages, H. (1984). Wertorientierungen im Wandel. Rückblick, Gegenwartsanalyse, Prognosen. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  29. LaFree, G. (1998). Losing Legitimacy. Street Crime and the Decline Of Social Institutions in America. Boulder, Col: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  30. LaFree, G. & Drass, K. A. (2002). Counting Crime Booms Among Nations: Evidence for Homicide Victimization Rates 1956 – 1998. Criminology, 40, 769 – 800.Google Scholar
  31. LaFree, G. & Tseloni, A. (2006). Democracy and Crime: A Multilevel Analysis of Homicide in 44 Countries. In S. Karstedt & G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, Crime and Justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 605, 26–49Google Scholar
  32. Lauth, H.-J., Pickel, G. & Welzel, C. (2000). Demokratiemessung. Konzepte und Befunde im internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Lederman, D., Loayza, N. & Menedez, A. (2002). Violent Crime: Does Social Capital Matter. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 509–539.Google Scholar
  34. Los, M. (1988). Communist Ideology, Law and Crime. London: Macmillan Press; New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  35. Los, M. (2003). Post-communist Fear of Crime and the Commercialization of Security. Theoretical Criminology, 6, 165–88.Google Scholar
  36. Mann, M. (1970). The Social Cohesion Of Liberal Democracies. American Sociological Review, 35, 423–439.Google Scholar
  37. Mann, M. (2005). The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnical Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mendez, J. E. (1999). Problems of Lawless Violence: Introduction. In J. E. Mendez, G. O’Donnell & P.S. Pinheiro (Eds.), The (un)rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America (pp. 1–25). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mendes, J. E., O’Donnell, G. & Pinheiro, P. S. (1999). The (un)rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  40. Messner, S. F. (1982). Societal development, social inequality and homicide. A cross-national test of a Durkheimian model. Social Forces, 61, 225–240.Google Scholar
  41. Messner, S. F. (2004). An Institutional-anomie theory Of Crime: Continuities And Elaborations in the Study Of Social Structure And Anomie. In D. Oberwittler & S. Karstedt (Eds.), Soziologie der Kriminalität (pp. 93–109). Special volume 43 of the Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Messner, S. F. & Rosenfeld, R. (1994). Crime and the American Dream. Belmont, CA: WadsworthGoogle Scholar
  43. Messner, S. F. & Rosenfeld, R. (1998). Social Structure And Homicide. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A Sourcebook Of Social Research (pp. 27 – 41). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Muller, E. N. & Seligson, M. A. (1994). Civic Culture And Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships. American Political Science Review, 88, 635–652.Google Scholar
  45. Nowotny, T. (2002). Markets, Democracy and Social Capital. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 31, 217–229.Google Scholar
  46. Pridemore, W. A. (2003). Measuring Homicide in Russia: A Comparison of Estimates from the Crime and Vital Statistics Reporting Systems. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1343–1354.Google Scholar
  47. Pridemore, W. A. & Kim, S.-W. (2006). Democratization and Political Change as Threats to Collective Sentiments: Testing Durkheim in Russia. In S. Karstedt & G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, Crime and Justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 605, 82–103Google Scholar
  48. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A. & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and Development. Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rose, R. (1998). Getting things Done In An Anti-Modern Society: Social Capital Networks In Russia. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper, 6. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenfeld, R., Messner, S. F. & Baumer, E. P. (2001). Social Capital and Homicide. Social Forces, 80, 283–309.Google Scholar
  51. Rothstein, B. & Stolle, D. (2002). How Political Institutions Create and Destroy Social Capital. An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust Project on Honesty and Trust. Workshop 2, Collegium Budapest. BudapestGoogle Scholar
  52. Sampson, R. & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences. Law & Society Review, 32, 777–804.Google Scholar
  53. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbusch, S. W. & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods And Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study Of Collective Efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.Google Scholar
  54. Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, Welfare State, and Homicide: Further Support for the Institutional Anomie Theory. Criminology, 38, 1021–1042.Google Scholar
  55. Steinberg, J. (2001). Crime Wave. The South African Underworld and Its Foes. Witwatersrand: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sztompka, P. (1993). Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post-Communist Societies. Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie, 22, 85–95.Google Scholar
  57. Tocqueville, A. (2000 [1835 and 1840]) Democracy in America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (pp. 283–357) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  61. Walberg, P., McKee, M., Shkolnikov, V., Chenet, L. & Leon, D. A. (1998). Economic Change, Crime, and Mortality Crisis in Russia: Regional Analysis. British Medical Journal, 317, 312–318.Google Scholar
  62. Waldmann, P. (2002). Der anomische Staat. Über Recht, öffentliche Sicherheit und Alltag in Lateinamerika. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar
  63. Waldmann, P. (2003). Diktatur, Demokratisierung und soziale Anomie. München: Vögel.Google Scholar
  64. Welzel, C. (2002). Fluchtpunkt Humanentwicklung. Über die Grundlagen der Demokratie und die Ursachen ihrer Ausbreitung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. School of Criminology, Education, Sociology and Social WorkKeele UniversityKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations