What is the Study of Jury Decision Making About and What Should it be About?
KeywordsSexual Harassment Racial Bias Punitive Damage Mock Juror Damage Award
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bornstein, B.H., & McCabe, S.G. (2005). Jurors of the absurd? The role of consequentiality in jury simulation research. Florida State Law Review, 32, 443–467.Google Scholar
- Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Diamond, S.S., Vidmar, N., Rose, M., Ellis, L., & Murphy, B. (2003). Jury discussions during civil trials: Studying an arizona innovation, University of Arizona Law Review, 45, 1–81.Google Scholar
- Forgas, J. (2001). Affect and information processing strategies: An interactive relationship. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 253–282). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The Story Model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519–557.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Smith, C.A., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838.Google Scholar
- Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2005a). Cross-situational projection. In M. Alicke, J. Krueger, & D. Dunning (Eds.), Self and social Judgment (pp. 43–64). Psychology Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, D. (2005b). Empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. In S. Hodges & B. Malle (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 284–297). Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Wiener, R.L. (2003). Death penalty research in Nebraska: How do judges and juries reach penalty decisions? Nebraska Law Review, 81, 301–320.Google Scholar
- Wiener, R.L., Block-Lieb, S., Gross, K., & Baron-Donovan, C. (2005). Unwrapping assumptions: Applying social analytic jurisprudence to consumer bankruptcy law and policy. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 79, 453–483.Google Scholar
- Wiener, R.L., Holtje, M., Winter, R.J., Cantone, J.A., Block-Lieb, S., & Gross, K. (2006). Psychology and BAPCPA: Enhanced disclosure and emotion. Missouri Law Review, 71, 1003–1033.Google Scholar
- Wiener, R.L., Rogers, M., Winter, R., Hurt, L.E., Hackney, A., Kadela, K., Seib, H., Rauch, S., Warren, L., & Morasco, B. (2004). Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10(4), 516–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilson,T.D., & Gilbert, D.T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345–411). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008