Constructs of Justice: Beyond Civil Litigation

  • Alan J. Tomkins
  • Kimberly Applequist


Procedural Justice Distributive Justice Dispute Resolution Restorative Justice Justice Principle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arvai, J. L. 2003. Communicating the results of participatory decision making: Effects on the perceived acceptability of risk-policy decisions. Risk Analysis, 23, 281–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornstein, B. H., & Poser, S. (in press). Perceptions of procedural and distributive justice in the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy. Google Scholar
  4. Brickman, P. (1977). Crime and punishment in sports and society. Journal of Social Issues, 33(1), 140–164.Google Scholar
  5. Court Statistics Project. (2006). State court caseload statistics, 2005. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts. Available on-line at Scholar
  6. Cross, F. B. (2005). Law and trust. Georgetown Law Review, 93, 1457–1545.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Elster, J. (1995). The idea of equality revisited. In J. Altham and R. Harrison (Eds.), World, mind, and ethics: Essays on the ethical philosophy of Bernard Williams (pp. 4–18). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980–1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law and Society Review, 15, 631–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galanter, M. S. (1983). Reading the landscape of disputes: What we know and don’t know (and think we know) about our allegedly contentious and litigious society. UCLA Law Review, 31, 4–71.Google Scholar
  11. Galanter, M. S. (1993). News from nowhere: The debased debate on civil justice. Denver University Law Review, 71, 77–103.Google Scholar
  12. Galanter, M. S. (1996). Real world torts: An antidote to anecdote. Maryland Law Review, 55, 1093–1160.Google Scholar
  13. Gray-Kanatiiosh, B., & Lauderdale, P. (2006). The web of justice: Restorative justice has presented only part of the story. Wicazo Sa Review, 21(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene, E. (2007). “Can we talk?” Therapeutic jurisprudence, restorative justice, and tort litigation. [this volume]Google Scholar
  15. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Cook, K. S. (2001). Distributive justice: Recent theoretical developments and applications. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 93–132). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Helm, J. P. (2001). Asbestos litigation and the proposed administrative remedy: Between the values of individualism and distributive justice. Emory Law Journal, 50, 631–662.Google Scholar
  17. Hersch, J. (2006). Demand for a jury trial and the selection of cases for trial. Journal of Legal Studies, 35, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (Eds.) (2001). What is it about government that Americans dislike? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hopkins, S. M., & Weathington, B. L. (2006). The relationships between justice perceptions, trust, and employee attitudes in a downsized organization. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 140, 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kritzer, H. M., Vidmar, N., & Bogart, W. A. (1991). To confront or not to confront: Measuring claiming rates in discrimination grievances.Law and Society Review, 25, 875–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lerner, M. J., & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.) (1981). The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  23. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  24. Markell, D. L. (2006). Understanding citizen perspectives on government decision making processes as a way to improve the administrative state. Environmental Law, 36, 651–708.Google Scholar
  25. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michelbach, P. A., Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Doing Rawls justice: An experimental study of income distribution norms. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, R. E., & Sarat, A. (1980–1981). Grievances, claims, and disputes: Assessing the adversary culture. Law and Society Review,15, 525–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mnookin, R. H., & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce, Yale Law Journal, 88, 950–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrison, B., & Ahmed, E. (Eds.) (2006). Restorative justice and civil society. Journal of Social Issues, 62 (2), 209–438.Google Scholar
  30. Pleasence, P. (2006). Causes of action: Civil law and social justice (2nd ed.). Norwich, England: The Stationary Office and Legal Services Commission.Google Scholar
  31. Robbennolt, J. K. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement. Michigan Law Review, 102, 461–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robbennolt, J. K. (2005). What we know and don’t know about the role of apologies in health care disputes. Georgia State University Law Review, 21, 1009–1027.Google Scholar
  33. Robbennolt, J. K. (2006). Apologies and settlement levers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 3, 333–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robbennolt, J. K. (2007). Apologies and civil justice. [this volume]Google Scholar
  35. Roche, D. (2006). Dimensions of restorative justice. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rubin, E. (2005). The myth of accountability and the anti-administrative impulse. Michigan Law Review, 103, 2073–2136.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., Michelbach, P. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental approach to distributive justice. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 749–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shultz, T. R., & Darley, J. M. (1991). An information-processing model of retributive justice based on “legal reasoning”. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Research (Vol.2, pp. 247–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: Can justice motivations and superordinate categorizations encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and encourage the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suk, J. C. (2006). Antidiscrimination law in the administrative state. University of Illinois Law Review, 2006, 405–473.Google Scholar
  41. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trubek, D. M., Grossman, J. B., Felstiner, W. L. F., Kritzer, H. M., & Sarat, A. (1983). Civil litigation research project: Final report. Madison: University of Wisconsin Law School.Google Scholar
  45. Trubek, D. M., Sarat, A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Kritzer, H. M., & Grossman, J. B. (1983). The costs of ordinary litigation. UCLA Law Review, 31, 72–127.Google Scholar
  46. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess fairness in legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tyler, T. R. (1991). Using procedures to justify outcomes: Testing the viability of a procedural justice strategy for managing conflict and allocating resources in work organizations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tyler, T. R. (1992). The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: Implications for civil commitment hearings. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 46, 401–413.Google Scholar
  49. Tyler, T. R. (1994a). Governing amid diversity: Can fair decision-making procedures bridge competing public interests and values? Law and Society Review, 28, 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tyler, T. R. (1994b). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tyler, T. R. (1997b). The psychological of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tyler, T. R. (2004). Affirmative action in an institutional context: The antecedents of policy preferences and political support. Social Justice Research, 17, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tyler, T. R. (2007). Racial profiling, attributions of motive, and the acceptance of social authority. In R. L. Wiener, B. H. Bornstein, R. Schopp, & S. L. Willborn (Eds.), Social consciousness in legal decision making: Psychological perspectives (pp. 61–74). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tyler, T. R., & Darley, J. (2000). Building a law-abiding society: Taking public views about morality and the legitimacy of legal authorities into account when formulating substantive law. Hofstra Law Review, 28, 707–739.Google Scholar
  58. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, A. E. (2001). Procedural justice. In J. Sanders and V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 65–92). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., & Huo, Y. J. (2000). Cultural values and authority relations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 1138–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tyler, T. R., & Thorisdottir, H. (2003). A psychological perspective on compensation for harm: Examining the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. DePaul Law Review, 53, 355–391.Google Scholar
  61. Umbreit, M. S., & Ritter, R. (2006). Arab offenders meet Jewish victim: Restorative family dialogue in Israel. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Lightfoot, E. (2006). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251–304.Google Scholar
  63. U.S. Courts. (2007, March 13). Fiscal year 2006 caseloads remain at high levels. On-line at Scholar
  64. Vines, P. (2007). The power of apology: Mercy, forgiveness or corrective justice in the civil liability arena? Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice, 1 (1), Art. 5, 1–51. Available on-line at Scholar
  65. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  66. Weinrib, E. J. (2002). Corrective justice in a nutshell. University of Toronto Law Journal, 52, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan J. Tomkins
    • 1
  • Kimberly Applequist
  1. 1.Public Policy Center, University of NebraskaLincoln

Personalised recommendations