Can We Talk?

Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Restorative Justice, and Tort Litigation
  • Edie Greene


Dispute Resolution Restorative Justice Whiplash Injury Punitive Damage Injured Person 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, M., & Dewberry, C. (1994). “I’ve said I’m sorry, haven’t I?” A study of the identity implications and current restraints that apologies create for their recipients. Current Psychology, 13, 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezanson, R., Cranberg, G., & Soloski, J. (1987). Libel law and the press: Myth and reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Binder, L., & Rohling, M. (1996). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed-head injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 6–10.Google Scholar
  4. Bonanno, G., & Kaltman, S. (1999). Toward an integrative perspective on bereavement. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 760–776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornstein, B., Rung, L., & Miller, M. (2002). The effects of defendant remorse on mock juror decisions in a malpractice case. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 393-409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Charles, S., Warnecke, R., & Wilbert, J. (1987). Sued and nonsued physicians: Satisfactions, dissatisfactions, and sources of stress. Psychosomatics: Journal of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, 28, 462–468.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, S., Wilbert, J., & Franke, K. (1985). Sued and non-sued physicians’ self-reported reactions to malpractice litigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 437–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles, S., Wilbert, J., & Kennedy, E. (1984). Physicians’ self-reports of reactions to malpractice litigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 563–565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1999). Advising clients to apologize. University of Southern California Law Review, 72, 1009–1069.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (2000). Apology and organizations: Exploring an example from medical practice. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 27, 1447–1482.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (2002). Legislating apology: The pros and cons. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 70, 819–872.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (2005). The immorality of denial. Tulane Law Review, 79, 903–953.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, T. (2004). Tort trials and verdicts in large counties, 2001 (NCJ #206240). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  15. Culpan, R., & Taylor, C. (1973). Psychiatric disorders following road traffic and industrial injury. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 7, 32–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daicoff, S. (2003). Resolution without litigation: Are courtrooms battlegrounds for losers? American Bar Association G/P Solo Magazine, Oct./Nov. Retrieved from: Scholar
  17. Daly, K. (2006). The limits of restorative justice. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (eds.), Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Darby, B., & Schlenker, B. (1989). Children’s reaction to transgressions: Effects of the actor’s apology, reputation, and remorse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 353–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dauer, E. (2003). A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective on legal responses to medical errors. Journal of Legal Medicine, 24, 37–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dauer, E., & Marcus, L. (1997). Adapting mediation to link resolution of malpractice disputes with health care quality improvement. Law and Contemporary Problems, 60, 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeCarufel, A. (1981). Victims’ satisfaction with compensation: Effects of initial disadvantage and third party intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DesRosiers, N., Feldthusen, B., & Hankivsky, O. (1998). Legal compensation for sexual violence: Therapeutic consequences and consequences for the judicial system. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dohrenwend, B., Krasnoff, L., & Askenasy, A. (1978). Exemplification of a method for scaling life events: The PERI Life Events Scale. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 205–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duclos, C., Eichler, M., Taylor, L., Quintela, J., Main, D., Pace, W., & Staton, E. (2005). Patient perspectives on patient-provider communication after adverse events. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 17, 479–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenberg, T., Garvey, S., & Wells, M. (1998). But was he sorry? The role of remorse in capital sentencing. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1599–1637.Google Scholar
  27. Feinstein, A., Ouchteriony, D., Somerville, J., & Jardine, A. (2001). The effects of litigation on symptom expression: A prospective study following mild traumatic brain injury. Medicine, Science and the Law, 41, 116–121.Google Scholar
  28. Flaten, C. (1996). Victim-offender mediation: Application with serious offenses committed by juveniles. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (eds.), Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gallagher, T., Waterman, A., Evers, A., Fraser, V., & Levinson, W. (2003). Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 1001–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garvey, S. (1998). Aggravation and mitigation in capital cases: What do jurors think? Columbia Law Review, 98, 1538–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gold, G., & Weiner, B. (2000) Remorse, confession, group identity and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 291–300.Google Scholar
  32. Harr, J. (1995). A civil action. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, I., Mulford, J., Solomon, M., van Gelder, J., & Young, J. (2005). Association between compensation status and outcome after surgery: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 1644–1652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hensel, W. (2005). The disabling impact of wrongful birth and wrongful life actions. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 40, 141–195.Google Scholar
  35. Hensler, D. (2003a). Our courts, ourselves: How the alternative dispute resolution movement is re-shaping our legal system. Penn State Law Review, 108, 165–197.Google Scholar
  36. Hensler, D. (2003b). Money talks: Searching for justice through compensation for personal injury and death. DePaul Law Review, 53, 417–455.Google Scholar
  37. Hepler, D. (1993). Providing creative remedies to bystander emotional distress victims: A feminist perspective. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 14, 71–104.Google Scholar
  38. Hickson, G., Clayton, E., Githens, P., & Sloan, F. (1992). Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following prenatal injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 1359–1363.Google Scholar
  39. Hodgins, H., & Liebeskind, E. (2003). Apology versus defense: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kakalik, J., Dunaworth, T., Hill, L., McCaffrey, D., Oshiro, M., Pace, N., & Vaiana, M. (1996). An evaluation of judicial case management under the Civil Justice Reform Act (Publication MR-802-ICJ). Santa Monica: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
  41. Kleinke, C., Wallis, R., & Stalder, K. (1992). Evaluation of a rapist as a function of expressed intent and remorse. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 525–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kraman, S. (2001). A risk management program based on full disclosure and trust: Does everyone win? Comprehensive Therapy, 27, 253–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Latif, E. (2001). Apologetic justice: Evaluating apologies tailored toward legal solutions. Boston University Law Review, 81, 289–320.Google Scholar
  44. Levi, D. (1997). The role of apology in mediation. New York University Law Review, 72, 1165–1210.Google Scholar
  45. Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R., Ebener, P., Felstiner, W., Hensler, D., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. (1990). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants’ evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law and Society Review, 24, 953–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Louisell, D., Hazard, G., & Tait, C. (eds.) (1989). Pleading and procedure: State and federal (6th edition). Foundation Press. (Quoting Learned Hand. The deficiencies of trials to reach the heart of the matter. Address before the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Nov. 17, 1921.)Google Scholar
  47. Mayou, R. (1992). Psychiatric aspects of road traffic accidents. International Review of Psychiatry, 4, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mazor, K., Simon, S., Yood, R., Martinson, B., Gunter, M., Reed, G., & Gurwitz, J. (2004). Health plan members’ views about disclosure of medical errors. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140, 409–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. McCullough, M., Worthington, E., & Rachal, K. (1997). Interpersonal forgiveness in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mendelson, G. (1986). Chronic pain and compensation: A review. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 1, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murdock, D. (2005). “Sorry Works” A prescription for fewer medical-malpractice lawsuits. National Review, August 29. Retrieved from:
  52. Netzig, L., & Trenczek, T. (1996). Restorative justice as participation: Theory, law, experience and research. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (eds.), Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Petrucci, C. (2002). Apology in the criminal justice setting: Evidence for including apology as an additional component in the legal system. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 337–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pipes, R., & Alessi, M. (1999). Remorse and a previously punished offense in assignment of punishment and estimated likelihood of a repeated offense. Psychological Reports, 85, 246–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poulson, B. (2003). A third voice: Review of empirical research on the psychological outcomes of restorative justice. Utah Law Review, 2003, 167–203.Google Scholar
  57. Robbennolt, J. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement: An empirical examination. Michigan Law Review, 102, 461–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robbennolt, J. (2005). What we know and don’t know about the role of apologies in resolving health care disputes. Georgia State University Law Review, 21, 1009–1027.Google Scholar
  59. Robbennolt, J. (2006). Apologies and settlement levers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 3, 333–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robinson, D., Smith-Lovin, L., & Tsoudis, O. (1994). Heinous crime or unfortunate accident? The effects of remorse on responses to mock criminal confessions. Social Forces, 73, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rohling, M., Binder, L., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1995). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain. Health Psychology, 14, 537–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenblatt, P. (1983). Grief and involvement in wrongful death litigation. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rumsey, M. (1976). Effects of defendant background and remorse on sentencing judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shestowsky, D. (2004). Procedural preferences in alternate dispute resolution: A closer, modern look at an old idea. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 211–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shuman, D. (1993). Making the world a better place through tort law? Though the therapeutic looking glass. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10, 739–759.Google Scholar
  66. Shuman, D. (2000a). When time does not heal: Understanding the importance of avoiding unnecessary delay in the resolution of tort cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 880–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shuman, D. (2000b). The role of apology in tort law. Judicature, 83, 180–189.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, S. (1987). The critics and the “crisis”: A reassessment of current conceptions of tort law. Cornell Law Review, 72, 765–798.Google Scholar
  69. Stolle, D., Wexler, D., Winick, B., & Dauer, E. (1997). Integrating preventive law and therapeutic jurisprudence: A law and psychology based approach to lawyering. California Western Law Review, 4, 15–51.Google Scholar
  70. Strang, H., & Sherman, L. (2003). Repairing the harm: Victims and restorative justice. Utah Law Review, 2003, 15–42.Google Scholar
  71. Strang, H., Sherman, L., Angel, C., Woods, D., Bennett, S., Newbury-Birch, D., & Inkpen, N. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice conferences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strasburger, L. (1999). The litigant-patient: Mental health consequences of civil litigation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27, 203–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sugarman, S. (2000). A century of change in personal injury law. California Law Review, 88, 2405–2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sullivan, D., & Tifft, L. (2006). Introduction: The healing dimension of restorative justice: A one-world body. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (eds.), Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Sunstein, C., Hastie, R., Payne, J., Schkade, D., & Viscusi, W. (2002). Punitive damages: How juries decide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Swartzman, L., Teasell, R., Shapiro, A., & McDermid, A. (1996). The effect of litigation status on adjustment to whiplash injury. Spine, 21, 53–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taft, L. (2005). Apology and medical mistake: Opportunity or foil? Annals of Health Law, 14, 55–94.Google Scholar
  78. Tyler, T. (1996). The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: Implications for civil commitment hearings. In D. Wexler & B. Winick (eds.), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  79. Tyler, T. (2006). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Umbreit, M., Coates, R., & Roberts, A. (1998). Impact of victim-offender mediation in Canada, England and the United States. The Crime Victims Report, Jan.–Feb, 20–92.Google Scholar
  81. Umbreit, M., Vos, B., Coates, R., & Brown, K. (2003). Facing violence: The path of restorative justice dialogue. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  82. Umbreit, M., Vos, G., Coates, R., & Lightfoot, E. (2005). Restorative justice in the 21st century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251–304.Google Scholar
  83. Vincent, C., Pincus, T., & Scurr, J. (1993). Patients’ experience of surgical accidents. Quality in Health Care: QHC, 2, 77–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Vincent, C., Young, M., & Phillips, A. (1994). Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action, Lancet, 343, 1609–1615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Waldman, E. (1998). The evaluative-facilitative debate in mediation: Applying the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence. Marquette Law Review, 82, 155–170.Google Scholar
  86. Wales, “Reckless Johnny” (2003). “It’s not about the money” (CD). Villa Villa Music.Google Scholar
  87. Weighill, V. (1983). Compensation neurosis: A review of the literature. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 27, 97–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weissman, H. (1991). Forensic psychological assessment and the effects of protracted litigation on impairment in personal injury litigation. Forensic Reports, 4, 416–429.Google Scholar
  89. Werth, B. (1988). Damages: One family’s legal struggles in the world of medicine. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  90. Wexler, D., & Winick, B. (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  91. White, S., & Neale, M. (1994). The role of negotiator aspirations and settlement expectancies in bargaining outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Witman, A., Park, D., & Hardin, S. (1996). How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes. Archives of Internal Medicine, 156, 2565–2569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Witvliet, C., Ludwig, T., & Bauer, D. (2002). Please forgive me: Transgressors’ emotions and physiology during imagery of seeking forgiveness and victim responses. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 21, 219–233.Google Scholar
  94. Witvliet, C., Worthington Jr., E., & Wade, N. (2002). The effects of apology and restitution on self-report and physiological responses associated with reducing unforgiveness. Paper presented at the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  95. Worthington, E., Witvliet, C., Lerner, A., & Scherer, M. (2005). Forgiveness in health research and medical practice. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 1, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edie Greene
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Colorado-Colorado SpringsColorado Springs

Personalised recommendations