How Juryphobia and Fears of Fraudulent Claims Disserve Medical Malpractice Reform Efforts

  • Monica K. Miller


Whiplash Injury Computerize Physician Order Entry Punitive Damage Mock Juror Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abwender, D. A., & Hough, K. (2001). Interactive effects of characteristics of defendant and mock juror on U. S. participants’ judgment and sentencing recommendations. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 603–615.Google Scholar
  2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2007). The ACGME’s approach to limit resident duty hours: The common standards and activities to promote adherence. Retrieved April 23, 2007 from: Scholar
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2007). Clinical practice guidelines. Retrieved April 23, 2007 from: Scholar
  4. Ayas, N. T., Barger, L. K., Cade, B. E., Hashimoto, D. M., Rosner, B., Cronin, J. W., et al. (2006). Extended work duration and the risk of self-reported percutaneous injuries in interns. Journal of American Medical Association, 296, 1055–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, P. (2005, January 6). Bush campaigns to curb lawsuits: President says “junk” litigation is driving small-town doctors out of business. Washington Post, p. A6. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from: Scholar
  6. Barger, L. K., Ayas, N. T., Cade, B. E., Cronin J. W., Rosner, B., Speizer, F. E., et al. (2006). Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures. PloS Medicine, 3, 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benedetto, R. (2005, January 5). Bush pushes for medical malpractice case limits. USA Today. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from: Scholar
  8. Berwick, D. M., & Winickoff, D. E. (1996). The truth about doctors’ handwriting: A prospective study. BMJ, 313, 1657–1658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, B., Silver, C., Hyman, D. A., & Sage, W. M. (2005). Stability, not crisis: Medical malpractice claim outcomes in Texas, 1988–2002. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2, 207–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boulard, G. (2002, December). The doctors’ big squeeze. State Legislatures, 48–62.Google Scholar
  11. Bornstein, B. H., Rung, L. M., & Miller, M. K. (2002). The effects of defendant remorse on mock juror decisions in a malpractice case. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 393–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caplan, J. (2007). Cause of Death: Sloppy Doctors. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from:,8599,1578074,00.html?cnn=yes.Google Scholar
  13. Cheeseman, G. A., & Boon, N. (2001). Reputation and the legibility of doctors’ handwriting in situ. Scottish Medical Journal, 46, 79–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Clay, S. W., & Conatser, R. R. (2003). Characteristics of physicians disciplined by the State Medical Board of Ohio. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 103, 81–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. R. (1999). Advising clients to apologize. Southern California Law Review, 72, 1009–1068.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, T. H., & Smith, S. K. (2004). Civil trial cases and verdicts in large counties, 2001. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. NCJ 202803. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from: Scholar
  17. Cordero, L., Kuehn, L., Kumar, R. R., & Mekhjian, H. S. (2004). Impact of computerized physician order entry on clinical practice in a newborn intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology, 24, 88–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collini, F. J. (2003, February). “Dirty little secret” of the medical malpractice crisis. Physicians News Digest. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from: Scholar
  19. Crosby, C. A., Britner, P. A., Jodl, K. M., & Portwood, S. G. (1995). The juvenile death penalty and the Eighth Amendment. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahm, P. (2006). Evidence-based medicine in prostate cancer: Where do we stand in 2006? Current Opinion in Urology, 16, 162–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daniels, S., & Martin, J. (1995). Civil juries and the politics of reform. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1989). Children’s reaction to transgressions: Effects of the actor’s apology, reputation, and remorse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 353–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Farber, H., & White, M. (1991). Medical malpractice: An empirical examination of the litigation process. Rand Journal of Economics, 22, 199–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geary, F. (2002, December 7). Malpractice insurance crisis: Kenny says UMC care threatened. Las Vegas Review Journal, p. 1BGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson, R., & Singh, J. P. (2003). Wall of silence: The untold study of the mistakes that kill and injure millions of Americans. Washington, DC: LifeLine.Google Scholar
  26. Goldsmith, H. (1976). The facts on the legibility of doctors’ handwriting. Medical Journal of Australia, 2, 462–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Greene, E., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  28. Gross, S. R., & Syverud, K. D. (1996). Don’t try: Civil jury verdicts in a system geared to settlement. UCLA Law Review, 44, 1–64.Google Scholar
  29. Grover, M. L., Bracamonte, J. D., Kanodia, A. K., Bryan, M. J., Donahue, S. P., Warner, A. M., et al. (2007). Assessing adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Mayo Clinical Proceedings, 82, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gold, G., & Weiner, B. (2000). Remorse, confession, group identity and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 291–300.Google Scholar
  31. Hans, V. P. (2000). Business on trial: The civil jury and corporate responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hastie, R., Schkade, D., & Payne, J. (1998). A study of juror and jury judgments in civil cases: Deciding liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawkins, R. C. (2005). The evidence based medicine approach to diagnostic testing: Practicalities and limitations. Clinical Biochemist: Reviews, 26, 7–18.Google Scholar
  34. Hickson, G. B., Clayton, E. W., Githens, P. B., & Sloan, F. A. (1992). Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. Journal of American Medical Association, 267, 1359–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huycke, L. I., & Huycke, M. M. (1994). Characteristics of potential plaintiffs in malpractice litigation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120, 792–798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Institute of Medicine. (2000). To Err is Human: Building a safer health system. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from: Scholar
  37. Jacobson, S. K., & Berger, C. R. (1974). Communication and justice: Defendant attributes and their effects on the severity of his sentence. Speech Monographs, 41, 282–286.Google Scholar
  38. Kleinke, C. L., Wallis, R., & Stalder, K. (1992). Evaluation of a rapist as a function of expressed intent and remorse. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 525–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koppel, R., Metlay, J. P., Cohen, A., Abaluck, B., Localio, A. R., Kimmel, S. E., & Strom, B. L. (2005). Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 1261–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Landrigan, C. P., Barger, L. K., Cade, B. E., Ayas, N. T., & Czeisler, C. A. (2006). Interns’ compliance with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour limits. Journal of American Medical Association, 296, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Landrigan, C. P., Rothschild, J. M., Cronin, J. W., Kaushal, R., Burdick, E., Katz, J. T., et al. (2004). Effect of reducing interns’ work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 1838–1848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lieberman, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (2007). Scientific jury selection. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  43. Lyons, R., Payne, C., McCabe, M., & Fielder, C. (1998). Legibility of doctors’ handwriting: Quantitative comparative study, BMJ, 317, 863–864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. MacCoun, R. J. (2006). Media reporting of jury verdicts: Is the tail (of the distribution) wagging the dog? DePaul Law Review, 55, 539–562.Google Scholar
  45. MacCoun, R. J. (1996). Differential treatment of corporate defendants by juries: An examination of the ‘‘deep-pockets’’ hypothesis. Law and Society Review, 30, 121–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Macgregor, F. C. (1984). Cosmetic surgery: A sociological analysis of litigation and a surgical specialty. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 8, 219–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marder, N. S. (2005). The medical malpractice debate: The jury as scapegoat. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 38, 1267–1296.Google Scholar
  48. Morrison, J., & Wickersham, P. (1998). Physicians disciplined by a state medical board. Journal of American Medical Association, 279, 1915–1916.Google Scholar
  49. Mott, N. L., Hans, V. P., & Simpson, L. (2000). What’s half a lung worth? Civil jurors accounts of their award decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 24(4), 401–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orleans, J. F., & Gurtman, M. B. (1984). Effects of physical attractiveness and remorse on evaluations of transgressors. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 6, 49–56.Google Scholar
  51. Peters, P. G. (2007). Doctors and Juries. Michigan Law Review, 106, 1453–1496.Google Scholar
  52. Pipes, R. B., & Alessi, M. (1999). Remorse and a previously punished offense in assignment of punishment and estimated likelihood of a repeated offense. Psychological Reports, 85, 246–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pritchard, R. S. (2004, March 26). Illinois health care system reaches code blue. Springfield, IL: Office of State Representative Robert W. Pritchard.Google Scholar
  54. Proeve, M. J., & Howells, K. (2006). Effects of remorse and shame and criminal justice experience on judgments about a sex offender. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robbennolt, J. K. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement: An empirical examination. Michigan Law Review, 102, 460–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinson, D. T., Smith-Lovin, L., & Tsoudis, O. (1994). Heinous crime or unfortunate accident? The effects of remorse on responses to mock criminal confessions. Social Forces, 73, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rodgers, J. E., & Stough, W. G. (2007). Underutilization of evidence-based therapies in heart failure: The Pharmacist’s role. Pharmacotherapy, 27, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rumsey, M. G. (1976). Effects of defendant background and remorse on sentencing judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saks, M. J. (1992). Do we really know anything about the behavior of the tort litigation system – and why not? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 1147–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schectman, J. M., Schorling, J. B., Nadkarni, M. M., & Voss, J. D. (2005). Determinants of physician use of an ambulatory prescription expert system. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 711–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schlenker, B. R., & Darby, B. W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schneider, K. A., Murray, C. W., Shadduck, R. D., & Meyers, D. G. (2006). Legibility of doctors’ handwriting is as good (or bad) as everyone else’s. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15, 445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shannon, T., Feied, C., Smith, M., Handler, J., & Gillam, M. (2006). Wireless handheld computers and voluntary utilization of computerized prescribing systems in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 31, 309–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shulman, R., Singer, M., Goldstone, J., & Bellingan, G. (2005). Medication errors: A prospective cohort study of hand-written and computerized physician order entry in the intensive care unit. Critical Care, 9, 427–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sloan, F. A. (1991). Winners and losers: How medical malpractice disputes are resolved. Journal of American Health Policy, 1, 20–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Stapleton, A. M., Cuncins-Hearn, A., & Pinnock, C. (2001). Attitudes to evidence-based practice in urology: Results of a survey. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 71, 297–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., & Brennan, T. A. (2004). Health policy report: Medical malpractice. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(3), 283–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taur, Y., & Smith, M. A. (2007). Adherence to the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 44, 775–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taylor, S., Thomas, E., Meadows, S., Wingert, P., Rosenberg, D., Carmichael, M., et al. (2003, December, 15). Civil wars. Newsweek, 142, 42–52.Google Scholar
  71. Taylor, C., & Kleinke, C. L. (1992). Effects of severity of accident, history of drunk driving, intent, and remorse on judgments of a drunk driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1641–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Victims and Families United. (2004). Why Sorry Works! works. Overview of Sorry Works Program for the Medical Malpractice Crisis. Retrieved March 5, 2007 from: Scholar
  73. Vidmar, N. (1992). The unfair criticism of medical malpractice juries. Judicature, 76, 118–125.Google Scholar
  74. Vidmar, N. (1994). Are juries competent to decide liability in tort cases involving scientific/medical issues? Some data from medical malpractice. Emory Law Journal, 43, 885–911.Google Scholar
  75. Vidmar, N. (1995). Medical malpractice and the American jury: Confronting the myths about jury incompetence, deep pockets, and outrageous damage awards. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  76. Vidmar, N. (2005). Medical malpractice and the tort system in Illinois. Illinois Bar Journal, 93, 340–348.Google Scholar
  77. Vincent, C., & Young, M. (1994). Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet, 343, 1609–1615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Viscusi, W. K. (2004). The blockbuster punitive damages awards. Emory Law Journal, 53, 1405–1436.Google Scholar
  79. Williams, I. E. (2004). First, do no harm: The cure for medial malpractice. Greenville, SC: Author.Google Scholar
  80. Winslow, E. H., Nestor, V. A., Davidoff, S. K., Thompson, P. G., & Borum, J. C. (1997). Legibility and completeness of physicians’ handwritten medication orders. Heart and Lung: The journal of critical care, 26, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Woods, M. S. (2004). Healing words: The power of apology in medicine. Oak Park, IL: Doctors In Touch.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica K. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Nevada-RenoReno

Personalised recommendations