Skip to main content

History of Giftedness: Perspectives from the Past Presage Modern Scholarship

  • Chapter

Across centuries and cultures, exceptional performances and performers have intrigued scholars, practitioners, and the general public. Whatever the domain, highlevel achievements interest people, sometimes as a model to emulate, sometimes as an area of inquiry, sometimes as a curiosity.

Theoretically, the modern study of giftedness is related to the psychology of individual differences. In the nineteenth, twentieth, and twenty-first centuries, the psychological constructs of intelligence, creativity, and motivation provided the foundation for understanding giftedness. There are, however, earlier conceptions of extraordinary people and performances that have influenced our perspectives on giftedness as well. This chapter reviews briefly the historical interest in giftedness to the nineteenth century, shares four biographical summaries that illustrate key issues in the twentieth-century history of gifted education, offers a review of cognitive and affective variables which have historically been used to study giftedness, and concludes with attention to issues of particular interest to psychologists and mental health professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, J., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C.P., Arjmand, O., & Walberg, H.J. (1991). Educational productivity predictors among mathematically talented students. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britell, J.K. (1978). Martin D. Jenkins: A man for all seasons (1904–1978). Cross, 1(4), 354–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, E.C., & Feretti, R.P. (1987). Toward a theoretical integration of cognitive hypotheses about intellectual differences among children. In J. G. Borkowski & J. D. Day (Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp. 195–233). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. (1996). Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks. Roeper Review, 18, 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. (1993). Metacognition and giftedness: The state of the relationship. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E. (1986). The role of insight in giftedness. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 201–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerick, L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students’ perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D.Y. (1993). An investigation of the paradox of underachievement among gifted black students. Roeper Review, 16, 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J.J. (1994). Current and historical thinking on education for gifted and talented students (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372584).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, C.G., Burke, A., & Hollingworth, L.S. (1917). The psychology of a prodigious child. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(2), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geake, J., & Cooper, P. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: Implications for education? Westminster Studies in Education, 26, 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The science and politics of intelligence in gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 24–40). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., & Guerin, D.W. (2006). The Fullerton Longitudinal Study: A long-term investigation of intellectual and motivational giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 430–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinder, R.E. (1985). The gifted in our midst: By their divine deeds, neuroses, and mental test scores we have known them. In F.D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 5–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. (1994). The highly gifted: Their nature and needs. In J. B. Hansen & S. B. Hoover (Eds.), Talent development: Theories and practice (pp. 257–280). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Scale for Children. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, R.D., & McSheffrey, R. 1991. An investigation of self-concept in gifted children. Exceptional Children, 57, 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S. (1931). The child of very superior intelligence as a special problem in social adjustment. Mental Hygiene, 15(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S. (1936a). The founding of Public School 500: Speyer School. Teachers College Record, 38, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S. (1936b). The Terman classes at Public School 500. Journal of Educational Sociology, 13, 86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S. (1938). An enrichment curriculum for rapid learners at Public School 500, Speyer School. Teachers College Record, 39, 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. Yonkers, NY: World Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S., & Cobb, M. (1928). Children clustering at 165 IQ and children clustering at 146 IQ compared for three years in achievement. In G. Whipple (Ed.), Intelligence: Its nature and nurture: Part I. Nature and nurture: Their influence on achievement. Twenty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 3–33). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S., Garrison, C.G., & Burke, A. (1922). Subsequent history of E: Five years after the initial report. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janos, P.M., & Robinson, N.M. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In F.D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 149–195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jausovec, N. (2000). Differences in cognitive processes between gifted, intelligent, creative, and average individuals while solving complex problems: An EEG study. Intelligence, 28, 213–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M.D. (1936). A socio-psychological study of Negro children of superior intelligence. Journal of Negro Education, 5(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M.D. (1943). Case studies of Negro children of Binet IQ 160 and above. Journal of Negro Education, 12(2), 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, K., & LeBlanc, J. (1993). Forgotten pioneers in the study of gifted African Americans. Roeper Review, 15, 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A.G. (2002). A forgotten voice: A biography of Leta Stetter Hollingworth. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, B.E., & Short, E.B. (1991a). Changes in emotional resilience: Gifted adolescent boys. Roeper Review, 13, 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, B.E., & Short, E.B. (1991b). Changes in emotional resilience: Gifted adolescent females. Roeper Review, 13, 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, M.A., Chapa, B., Patterson, G., & Walling, D.D. (1995). The experience of giftedness: a concept map. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D.F. (2005). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombroso, C. (1891). The man of genius. London: Walter Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovecky, D.V. (1994). Exceptionally different children: Different minds. Roeper Review, 17, 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904) “ ‘General intelligence’, objectively determined and measured”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S.S., Zigler, E., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Psychosocial adjustment among intellectually gifted adolescents: The role of cognitive-developmental and experiential factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 361–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayseless, O. (1993). Gifted adolescents and intimacy in close same-sex relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neihart, M., Reis, S.M., Robinson, N.M., & Moon, S.M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, J. (1891). The insanity of genius. London: Ward & Downey.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, M.W., & Gill, H.S. (1998). On the relevance of research findings in cognitive neuroscience to educational practice. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P. M., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A.H. (1988). Reflections on three decades of education of the gifted. Gifted Education International, 5(2), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S.I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piechowski, M.M. (2003). Emotional and spiritual giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 403–416). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyryt, M.C., & Mendaglio, S. (1994). The multidimensional self-concept: A comparison of gifted and average-ability adolescents. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 17, 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, D.P., & Goodman, M. (1994). American culture and the gifted. In P.O. Ross (Ed.), National excellence: A case for developing American’s talent. An anthology of readings (pp. 109–121). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S.M., & Lovett, S. B. (1994). Examining the “F” in gifted; academically gifted adolescents’ physiological and affective responses to scholastic failure. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,17, 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 117–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., Shore, B.M., & Enersen, D.L. (2007). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N.M. (2003). Introduction. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K.B. (1986). Do the gifted think and learn differently? A review of recent research and its implications for instruction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, B.M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R.C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, B.M., Koller, M., & Dover, A. (1994). More from the water jars: A reanalysis of problem-solving performance among gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, D., & McCoach, D.B. (2005). Motivating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L.K. (2003). Gifted children with learning disabilities. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 533–543). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (2003). A broad view of intelligence: The theory of successful intelligence. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J., & Davidson, J.E. (1985). Cognitive development in the gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 37–74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T. (2005, March). Seven pioneering adult literacy educators in the history of teaching reading with adults in the United States. Paper presented at a meeting of Adult Literacy Research Working Group, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiatek, M.A. (1995). An empirical investigation of the social coping strategies used by gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 154–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A.J. (1958). History of interest in the gifted. In N.B. Henry (Ed.), Education for the gifted. The fifty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 21–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A.J. (1979). Pre-Sputnik to post-Watergate concern about the gifted. In A.H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development. The seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 5–27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A.J. (1993). History of giftedness and “gifted education” in world perspective. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks, & A.H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 3–27). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A.J. (2000). A history of giftedness in school and society. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks, R.J. Sternberg, & R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 23–53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L.M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Mental and physical characteristics of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L.M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theman, V., & Witty, P.A. (1943). Case studies and genetic records of two gifted Negroes. Journal of Psychology, 15, 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Garderen, D., & Montague, M. (2003). Visual-spatial representation: Mathematical problem solving and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 18, 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Kulieke, M. (1994). A study of self-concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students. Roeper Review, 16, 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialle, W. (1994). “nal” science? The work of Lewis Terman revisited. Roeper Review, 17, 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W.L., & Renzulli, J.S. (1987). A forty year follow-up study of students who attended Leta Hollingworth’s school for gifted students. Roeper Review, 10, 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S.C. (1993). WISC-R profiles of children with superior intellectual ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P.A. (1930). A study of one hundred gifted children. University of Kansas Bulletin of Education, 2(8), 3–44. Bureau of School Service and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P.A. (1958). Who are the gifted? In N.B. Henry (Ed.), Education of the gifted. The 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 41–63). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P.A., & Jenkins, M.D. (1934). The educational achievement of a group of gifted Negro children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 585–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P.A., & Jenkins, M.D. (1935). The case of ‘B’—a gifted Negro girl. Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P.A., & Lehman, H.C. (1927). Drive: A neglected trait in the study of the gifted. Psychological Review, 35, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P.A., & Lehman, H.C. (1928). An interpretation of the heredity background of two groups of mental deviates. American Journal of Sociology, 34(2), 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, A., Clinkenbeard, P.R. (2008). History of Giftedness: Perspectives from the Past Presage Modern Scholarship. In: Pfeiffer, S.I. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics