Advertisement

Gifted Identification Beyond the IQ Test: Rating Scales and Other Assessment Procedures

  • Steven I. Pfeiffer
  • Samara Blei

This chapter describes rating scales and other tests and procedures used in gifted identification aside from traditional intelligence tests (see Newman, this volume, for discussion of IQ tests). The chapter highlights how a psychologist’s conception of giftedness should guide the particular tests and procedures that one selects in conducting a gifted evaluation. The chapter very briefly describes a variety of alternative tests and procedures used in gifted identification, including nominations, nonverbal measures, portfolio assessment, dynamic assessment, and auditions. A more detailed discussion on gifted rating scales is provided. The Gifted Rating Scales is described in detail to illustrate how rating scales offer flexibility that complements and extends information from the intelligence test. The chapter proposes a gifted assessment model that intentionally links gifted identification and talent development by endorsing ongoing evaluation of a gifted student’s performance.

Keywords

Intellectual Ability Teacher Nomination Academic Ability Gifted Student Parent Education Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Athanasiou, M. S. (2000). Current nonverbal assessment instruments: A comparison of psychometric integrity and test fairness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, L. (1991). Three standard errors of measurement and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 3, 136–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barona, A., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1992). Effects of test administration procedures and acculturation level on achievement test scores. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blei, S., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2007). Peer ratings of giftedness: What the research suggests? Unpublished monograph, Gifted Research Center, Florida State University.Google Scholar
  5. Borghese, P., & Cronau, R. C. (2005). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test with limited English proficient Mexican-American elementary students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnson, S. K. (1997). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-3rd Edition. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, S. W., Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, C. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callahan, C. M. (2005). Identifying gifted students from underrepresented populations. Theory Into Practice, 44, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure “change”—or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham, C. M., Callahan, C. M., Plucker, J. A., Roberson, C., & Rapkin, A. (1998). Identifying Hispanic students of outstanding talent: Psychometric integrity of a peer nomination form. Exceptional Children, 64, 197–210.Google Scholar
  13. Ericcson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 10, S70–S81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fives, C. J., & Flanagan, R. (2002). Review of the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. School Psychology International, 23, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S., & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc theory: A contemporary approach to interpretation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Ford, D. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilliam, J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and talented evaluation scales. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  19. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hooper, V. S., & Bell, S. M. (2006). Concurrent validity of the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test and the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen, A. (1974). How biased are culture-loaded tests? Genetic Psychology Monographs, 90, 185–244.Google Scholar
  23. Jensen, A. (2004). The mental chronometry of giftedness. In D. Boothe & J. L. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education (pp. 157–166). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  24. Johnsen, S. K. (1996). What are alternative assessments? Gifted Child Today, 19, 12–13.Google Scholar
  25. Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Assessment beyond definitions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 136–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1997). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test -2nd Edition. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  27. Kessel, J. B., & Zimmerman, M. (1993). Reporting errors in studies of the diagnostic performance of self-administered questionnaires: Extent of the problems, recommendations for standardized presentation of results, and implications for the peer review process. Psychological Assessment, 5, 395–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, S.-Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). Comparison between talent search students qualifying via scores on standardized tests and via parent nomination. Roeper Review, 28, 157–166.Google Scholar
  29. Lord, F. M. (1956). The measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Margulies, A. S., & Floyd, R. G. (2004). Test review: The Gifted Rating Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCallum, R. S., Bracken, B. A., & Wasserman, J. D. (2001). Essentials of nonverbal assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (1998). The Gifted Evaluation Scale — Technical Manual (2nd ed.). Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.Google Scholar
  34. Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.Google Scholar
  36. Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2005). Increasing minority children’s participation in gifted classes using the NNAT: A response to Lohman. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naglieri, J. A., & Ronning, M. E. (2000). Comparing white, African-American, Hispanic, and Asian children on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Psychological Assessment, 12, 328–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newton, R. R., & Rudestam, K. E. (1999). Your statistical consultant: Answers to your data analysis questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2001). Professional psychology and the gifted: Emerging practice opportunities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 1, 31–50.Google Scholar
  42. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.Google Scholar
  44. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2007). The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender and race, and diagnostic efficiency. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pfeiffer, S. I., Kumtepe, A., & Rosado, J. (2006). Gifted identification: Measuring change in a student’s profile of abilities using the Gifted Rating Scales. The School Psychologist, 60, 106–111.Google Scholar
  46. Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., & Jarosewich, T. (2007). The GRS-Preschool/Kindergarten Form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race. Roeper Review, 29, 206–211.Google Scholar
  47. Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., & Kumtepe, A. (in review). The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: A validation study based on age, gender, and race. Roeper Review.Google Scholar
  48. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.Google Scholar
  49. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students: Revised edition. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
  50. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2003). Reynolds Intellectual Screening Test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  51. Robins, P. M., Schoff, K. M., Glutting, J. J., & Abelkop, A. S. (2003). Discriminative validity of the Behavior Assessment System for Children-Parent Rating Scales in children with recurrent abdominal pain and matched controls. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  53. Ross, P. O. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  54. Ryser, G. R., & McConnell, K. (2004). Scales for Identifying Gifted Students: Ages 5 through 18. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Author.Google Scholar
  56. Schack, G. D., & Starko, A. J. (1990). Identification of gifted students: An analysis of criteria preferred by pre-service teachers, classroom teachers, and teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 346–363.Google Scholar
  57. Smutny, J. F. (Ed.). (1998). The young gifted child: Potential and promise, an anthology. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sparrow, S. S., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Newman, T. M. (2005). Assessment of children who are gifted with the WISC-IV. In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV: Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 282–299). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Stephens, K. R., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219–238.Google Scholar
  60. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success [Special Issue]. American Psychologist, (52) 10, 1030–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Diagnosing tests: Using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 209–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 45–59). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  63. U.S. Bureau of Census. (2000). Current population survey, October 2000: School Enrollment Supplement File [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Census (Producer/Distributor).Google Scholar
  64. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2002). Assessment of gifted student learning in the language arts. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 67–72.Google Scholar
  65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. & Trans.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 92–104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Ward, S. A. (2005). Review of the Gifted Rating Scales. In B. A. Spies & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The Sixteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 404–407). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
  67. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.Google Scholar
  68. Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Psychologist, 52, 1070–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zigler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven I. Pfeiffer
    • Samara Blei

      There are no affiliations available

      Personalised recommendations