Why do we interpret stimuli arriving at our retina as straight lines, squares, circles, and any kind of other familiar shape? This question may look incongruous: What is more natural than recognizing a “straight line” in a straight line image, a “blue cube” in a blue cube image? When we believe we see a straight line, the actual stimulus on our retina does not have much to do with the mathematical representation of a continuous, infinitely thin, and straight stroke. All images, as rough data, are a pointillist datum made of more or less dark or colored dots corresponding to local retina cell stimuli. This total lack of structure is equally true for digital images made of pixels, namely square colored dots of a fixed size.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Introduction. In: From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol 34. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74378-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74378-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72635-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74378-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)