Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of TreeQ and LVQ Classifiers for Music Information Retrieval

  • Matina Charami
  • Rami Halloush
  • Sofia Tsekeridou
Part of the IFIP The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 247)

Abstract

Classification algorithms are gaining more and more importance in many fields such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Retrieval, Data Mining and Machine Vision. Many classification algorithms have emerged, belonging to different families, among which the tree-based and the clustering-based ones. Such extensive availability of classifiers makes the selection of the optimal one per case a rather complex task. In this paper, we aim to address this issue by conducting extensive experiments in a music information retrieval application, specifically with respect to music genre queries, in order to compare the performance of two state-of-the-art classifiers belonging to the formerly mentioned two classes of classification algorithms, namely, TreeQ and LVQ, respectively, using a variety of music features for such a task. The deployed performance metrics are extensive: accuracy, precision, recall, Fmeasure, confidence. Conclusions on the best performance of either classifier to support music genre queries are finally drawn.

Keywords

Learn Vector Quantization Audio Data Music Genre Linear Predictive Code Music Information Retrieval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Jonathan T. Foote, TreeQ Manual V0.8, September, 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Kohonen, H. Hynninen, J. Kangas, H. Laaksonen, and K. Torkkola. LVQ-PAK: The learning vector quantization program package, Technical Report A30, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland, 1996Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonathan T. Foote, Content-based retrieval of music and audio, Multimedia Storage and Archiving Systems II, Proceedings of SPIE, 1997Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jonathan T. Foote, An overview of audio information retrieval, Multimedia Syst., Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 1999Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Music retrieval demo using open-source software package TreeQ by Jonathan T. Foote, http://www.rotorbrain.com/foote/musicr/doc16.html Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forecasting with artificial neural networks, http://www.neural-forecasting.com Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Helsinki University of Technology — Neural Networks Research Centre, http://www.cis.hut.fi/research/som_lvq_pak.shtml Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The HTK Toolkit, http://htk.eng.cam.ac.uk/ Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steve Young et al, The HTK Book (1995–1999 Microsoft Corporation, 2001–2006 Cambridge University Engineering Department)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matina Charami
    • 1
  • Rami Halloush
    • 1
  • Sofia Tsekeridou
    • 1
  1. 1.Athens Information Technology (AIT)Peania, AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations