Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Information Science and Statistics ((ISS))

  • 3153 Accesses

It is difficult or even impossible to construct models covering all aspects of (complex) problem domains of interest. A model is therefore most often an approximation of a problem domain that is designed to be applied according to the assumptions as determined by the background condition or context of the model. If a model is used under circumstances not consistent with the background condition, the results will in general be unreliable. The evidence need not be inconsistent with the model in order for the results to be unreliable. It may be that evidence is simply in conflict with the model. This implies that the model in relation to the evidence may be weak and therefore the results may be unreliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Conflict Analysis. In: Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams. Information Science and Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74101-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics