Advertisement

Disease, Outcomes, and Money

  • Robert M. Kaplan
Chapter

I can still remember the call. At age 77, Sally, a close friend of the family, had a positive mammogram. I was a professor at the medical school, and her family wanted to know the names of the best breast surgeon and the most distinguished medical oncologist. We all want the best medical interventionists when faced with a potentially fatal illness. After a biopsy, Sally learned that she had a condition called ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS. The doctors told Sally that this was a mild form of breast cancer, but the family was unwilling to take chances. She got surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Today, Sally is alive and doing well.

After treatment, family members became advocates for early detection in older women. They believed that Sally’s life had been saved because her doctor was “aggressive.” He ordered a mammogram and followed up the positive result with a biopsy, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. How can anyone argue with his judgment?

The problem is that Sally...

Keywords

Preventive Medicine Capita Spending Primary Care Doctor United States Preventive Service Task United States Preventive Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hassett MJ, O'Malley AJ, Pakes JR, Newhouse JP, Earle CC. Frequency and cost of chemotherapy-related serious adverse effects in a population sample of women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. Aug 16 2006;98(16):1108–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shapiro S, Coleman EA, Broeders M, et al. Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Epidemiol. Oct 1998;27(5):735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Welch HG. Should I Be Tested for Cancer? Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilmer T, Kronick R. It's the premiums, stupid: projections of the uninsured through 2013. Health Aff (Millwood). Apr 5 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Relman AS. Shattuck Lecture–the health care industry: where is it taking us? N Engl J Med. Sep 19 1991;325(12):854–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilmer T, Kronick R, Rice T. Children welcome, adults need not apply: changes in public program enrollment across states and over time. Med Care Res Rev. Feb 2005;62(1):56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kronick R, Gilmer T. Insuring low-income adults: does public coverage crowd out private? Health Aff (Millwood). Jan–Feb 2002;21(1):225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Curtis R. Getting real about the uninsured problem. Front Health Serv Manage. Summer 2005;21(4):39–44; discussion 45–38.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leape LL, Berwick DM. Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? JAMA. May 18 2005;293(19):2384–2390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richardson WC, Berwick DM, Bisgard JC, et al. The Institute of Medicine Report on Medical Errors: misunderstanding can do harm. Quality of Health Care in America Committee. MedGenMed. Sep 19 2000;2(3):E42.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woolf SH. United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on breast cancer screening. Cancer. Apr 1 1992;69(7 Suppl):1913–1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berg AO, Allan J, Woolf S. The mammography dilemma. Ann Intern Med. May 6 2003;138(9):770–771; author reply 771.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. Sep 3 2002;137(5 Part 1):347–360.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eddy DM. Breast cancer screening in women younger than 50 years of age: what's next? Ann Intern Med. Dec 1 1997;127(11):1035–1036.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reinhardt UE, Hussey PS, Anderson GF. U.S. health care spending in an international context. Health Aff (Millwood). May–Jun 2004;23(3):10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Starfield B. Is US health really the best in the world? J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284(4):483–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baicker K, Chandra A, Skinner JS. Geographic variation in health care and the problem of measuring racial disparities. Perspect Biol Med. Winter 2005;48(1 Suppl):S42–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Kaplan
    • 1
  1. 1.UCLA School of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations