Origins and Evolution of Cotranslational Transport to the ER

  • Thomas U. Schwartz
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 607)


All living organisms possess the ability to translocate proteins across biological membranes. This is a fundamental necessity since proteins function in different locations yet are synthesized in one compartment only, the cytosol. Even though different transport systems exist, the pathway that is dominandy used to translocate secretory and membrane proteins is known as the cotranslational transport pathway. It evolved only once and is in its core conserved throughout all kingdoms of life. The process is characterized by a well understood sequence of events: first, an N-terminal signal sequence of a nascent polypeptide is recognized on the ribosome by the signal recognition particle (SRP), then the SRP-ribosome complex is targeted to the membrane via the SRP receptor. Next, the nascent chain is transferred from SRP to the protein conducting channel, through which it is cotranslationally threaded. All the essential components of the system have been identified. Recent structural and biochemical studies have unveiled some of the intricate regulatory circuitry of the process. These studies also shed light on the accessory components unique to eukaryotes, pointing to early events in eukaryotic evolution.


Signal Recognition Particle Eukaryotic Membrane Nascent Chain Curr Opin Struct Biol Signal Recognition Particle Receptor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    von Heijne G. Signal sequences. The limits of variation. J Mol Biol 1985; 184:99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matlin KS. The strange case of the signal recognition particle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:538–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doudna JA, Batey RT. Structural insights into the signal recognition particle. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73:539–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Egea PF, Stroud RM, Walter P. Targeting proteins to membranes: Structure of the signal recognition particle. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15:213–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halic M, Beckmann R. The signal recognition particle and its interactions during protein targeting. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15:116–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keenan RJ, Freymann DM, Stroud RM et al. The signal recognition particle. Annu Rev Biochem 2001; 70:755–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pool MR. Signal recognition particles in chloroplasts, bacteria, yeast and mammals (review). Mol Membr Biol 2005; 22:3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walter P, Blobel G. Signal recognition particle contains a 7S RNA essential for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 1982; 299:691–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leipe DD, Wolf YI, Koonin EV et al. Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases. J Mol Biol 2002; 317:41–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halic M, Becker T, Pool MR et al. Structure of the signal recognition particle interacting with the elongation-arrested ribosome. Nature 2004; 427:808–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Nues RW, Brown JD. Saccharomyces SRP RNA secondary structures: A conserved S-domain and extended Alu-domain. RNA 2004; 10:75–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zwieb C, Eichler J. Getting on target: The archaeal signal recognition particle. Archaea 2002; 1:27–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Powers T, Walter P. Cotranslational protein targeting catalyzed by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle and its receptor. Embo J 1997; 16:4880–4886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilmore R, Walter P, Blobel G. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. II. Isolation and characterization of the signal recognition particle receptor. J Cell Biol 1982; 95:470–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Leeuw E, Poland D, Mol O et al. Membrane association of FtsY, the E. coli SRP receptor. FEBS Lett 1997; 416:225–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bibi E, Herskovits AA, Bochkareva ES et al. Putative integral membrane SRP receptors. Trends Biochem Sci 2001; 26:15–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zelazny A, Seluanov A, Cooper A et al. The NG domain of the prokaryotic signal recognition particle receptor, FtsY, is fully functional when fused to an unrelated integral membrane polypeptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:6025–6029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young JC, Ursini J, Legate KR et al. An amino-terminal domain containing hydrophobic and hydrophilic sequences binds the signal recognition particle receptor alpha subunit to the beta subunit on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:15650–15657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwartz T, Blobel G. Structural basis for the function of the beta subunit of the eukaryotic signal recognition particle receptor. Cell 2003; 112:793–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simon SM, Blobel G. A protein-conducting channel in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 1991; 65:371–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hartmann E, Sommer T, Prehn S et al. Evolutionary conservation of components of the protein translocation complex. Nature 1994; 367:654–657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van den Berg B, Clemons Jr WM, Collinson I et al. X-ray structure of a protein-conducting channel. Nature 2004; 427:36–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beckmann R, Spahn CM, Eswar N et al. Architecture of the protein-conducting channel associated with the translating 80S ribosome. Cell 2001; 107:361–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Collinson I, Breyton C, Duong F et al. Projection structure and oligomeric properties of a bacterial core protein translocase. Embo J 2001; 20:2462–2471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Menetret JF, Hegde RS, Heinrich SU et al. Architecture of the ribosome-channel complex derived from native membranes. J Mol Biol 2005; 348:445–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morgan DG, Menetret JF, Neuhof A et al. Structure of the mammalian ribosome-channel complex at 17A resolution. J Mol Biol 2002; 324:871–886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vetter IR, Wittinghofer A. The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions. Science 2001; 294:1299–1304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Romisch K, Webb J, Lingelbach K et al. The 54-kD protein of signal recognition particle contains a methionine-rich RNA binding domain. J Cell Biol 1990; 111:1793–1802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zopf D, Bernstein HD, Johnson AE et al. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kd protein subunit of the signal recognition particle contains an RNA binding site and can be crosslinked to a signal sequence. Embo J 1990; 9:4511–4517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bacher G, Lutcke H, Jungnickel B et al. Regulation by the ribosome of the GTPase of the signal-recognition particle during protein targeting. Nature 1996; 381:248–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Powers T, Walter P. Reciprocal stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by two directly interacting GTPases. Science 1995; 269:1422–1424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Egea PF, Shan SO, Napetschnig J et al. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 2004; 427:215–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Focia PJ, Shepotinovskaya IV, Scidler JA et al. Heterodimeric GTPase core of the SRP targeting complex. Science 2004; 303:373–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Herskovits AA, Shimoni E, Minsky A et al. Accumulation of endoplasmic membranes and novel membrane-bound ribosome-signal recognition particle receptor complexes in Escherichia coli. J Cell Biol 2002; 159:403–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Legate KR, Andrews DW. The beta-subunit of the signal recognition particle receptor is a novel GTP-binding protein without intrinsic GTPase activity. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:27712–27720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Song W, Raden D, Mandon EC et al. Role of Sec61 alpha in the regulated transfer of the ribosome-nascent chain complex from the signal recognition particle to the translocation channel. Cell 2000; 100:333–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stephenson K. Sec-dependent protein translocation across biological membranes: Evolutionary conservation of an essential protein transport pathway (review). Mol Membr Biol 2005; 22:17–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gorlich D, Rapoport TA. Protein translocation into proteoliposomes reconstituted from purified components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell 1993; 75:615–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bolhuis A. The archaeal Sec-dependent protein translocation pathway. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004; 359:919–927.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nakamura K, Yahagi S, Yamazaki T et al. Bacillus subtilis histone-like protein, HBsu, is an integral component of a SRP-like particle that can bind the Alu domain of small cytoplasmic RNA. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:13569–13576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Caetano-Anolles G, Caetano-Anolles D. Universal sharing patterns in proteomes and evolution of protein fold architecture and life. J Mol Evol 2005; 60:484–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chothia C, Gough J, Vogel C et al. Evolution of the protein repertoire. Science 2003; 300:1701–1703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sprang SR. G protein mechanisms: Insights from structural analysis. Annu Rev Biochem 1997; 66:639–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jekely G. Small GTPases and the evolution of the eukaryotic cell. Bioessays 2003; 25:1129–1138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nie Z, Hirsch DS, Randazzo PA. Arf and its many interactors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003; 15:396–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pasqualato S, Renault L, Cherfils J. Arf, Arl, Arp and Sar proteins: A family of GTP-binding proteins with a structural device for ‘front-back’ communication. EMBO Rep 2002; 3:1035–1041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee MC, Orci L, Hamamoto S et al. Sarlp N-terminal helix initiates membrane curvature and completes the fission of a COPII vesicle. Cell 2005; 122:605–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations