The Evaluation of Coordination Policies in Logistics Services Markets

  • Vito Albino
  • Rosa Maria Dangelico
  • Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 243)


Nowadays, due to the increasing complexity and expansion of supply chains, logistics is becoming a more strategic activity for firms in terms of both time and cost performance. In this paper, the coordination in a logistics services market based on vehicle consolidation policy is considered. In particular, three coordination policies characterized by different levels of collaboration among the actors of a supply stage are identified. Then, a model is developed for evaluating the transportation, coordination, and service lateness costs affecting each coordination policy. Finally, different coordination policies and collaborative relationships among the actors operating in the supply stage of an Italian brickworks company are discussed as a case study.


Supply Chain Transportation Cost Logistics Service Collaborative Network Coordination Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Albino V, Kuthz S, Messeni Petruzzelli A. Analysing logistics flows in industrial clusters using an enterprise input output model. Intermediate Input-Output Meetings on Sustainability, Trade & Productivity, July 26–28th 2006, Sendai, Japan.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cetinkaya S, Lee CY. Stock replenishment and shipment scheduling for vendor-managed inventory systems. Management Science 2000; 46: 217–232.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colombo MG, Mariotti S,. Organizing vertical markets: the Italtel case. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 1998; 4: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conway DG, Gorman MF. An application of interdependent lot size and consolidation point choice. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2006; 44: 65–72.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dapiran P, Lieb R, Milien R, Sohal A. Third party logistics services usage by large Australian firms. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 1996; 26: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dror M, Langevin A. A generalized travelling salesmen problem approach to the directed clustered rural postman proble. Transportation Science 1997; 31: 187–192.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall RW. Consolidation strategy: inventory, vehicles and terminals. Journal of Business Logistics 1987;8:57–73.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hall RW. Dependence between shipment size and mode in freight transportation. Transportation Science 1995; 19: 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hertz S, Alfredsson M. Strategic development of third party logistics provider. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003; 30: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hesse M, Rodrigue JP. The Transport Geography of Logistics and Freight Distribution. Journal of Transport Geography 2004; 12: 171 -184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lai KH, Cheng, TCE. A Study of the Freight Forwarding Industry in Hong Kong International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 2004; 7: 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lapierre SD, Ruiz AB, Soriano P. Designing distribution networks: formulation and solution heuristic. Transportation Science 2004; 38: 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laporte G, Norbert Y, Taillefer S. Solving a family of multi-depot vehicle routing and locationrouting problems. Transportation Science 1988; 22: 161–172.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    le Blanc HM, Cruijssen F, Fleuren HA, de Koster MBM. Factory gate pricing: an analysis of Dutch retail distribution. European Journal of Operational Research 2006; 174: 1950–1967.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lieb, RC, Bentz, BA. The Use of Third-Party Logistics Services by Large American Manufacturers: The 2003 Survey. Transportation Journal 2004; 43: 24–33.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malone TW. Bringing the market inside. Harvard Business Review 2004; 82: 106–114.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Malone TW. Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Science 1987; 33: 1317–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marschak J, Radner R. Economic Theory of Teams. New Heaven: Yale University Press 1972.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newboume MJ, Barrett C. Freight consolidation and the shippers, Part 1–5. Transportation Distribution Management 1972; 12: 2–6.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu L, Beamon BM. Supply chain coordination and cooperation mechanism: an attribute-based approach. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 2006; winter: 4–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vito Albino
    • 1
  • Rosa Maria Dangelico
    • 1
  • Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli
    • 1
  1. 1.DIMeGPolitecnico di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations