Supporting Mobile Virtual Team’s Coordination with SOA-Based Active Entities

  • Ruben Dario Franco
  • Andrés Neyem
  • Sergio Ochoa
  • Rosa Navarro
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 243)


The use of IT solutions to support preparedness, response and recovery process has been envisioned as a possible way to improve the support for collaboration among the actors participating in mobile teams operating under constrained scenarios. Software applications supporting mobility have typically been conceived as functional extensions of centralized enterprise systems hosted on corporate servers. However, in this work, we focus on those mobile scenarios which go one step further in terms of interoperability requirements. This proposal aims to support the design, deployment and execution of ad-hoc collaborative business processes (workflows) in mobile networks, operating under constrained conditions and taking advantage of the Active Entity (AE) concept.


Business Process Composite Service Collaborative Network Mobile Unit Active Entity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Columbia/Wharton Roundtable. “Risk Management Strategies in an Uncertain World,” IBM Palisades Executive Conference Center. April, 2002. (, last visit: Jan-2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U. Dayal, M. Hsu and R. Ladin, “Business Process Coordination: State of the Art, Trends, and Open Issues”, Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh International Conference on Very Large Data Base, Rome, Italy, Sep. 11–14, 2001, pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Godschalk, D. “Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities”, Natural Hazards Review. ASCE. August 2003. pp. 136–146.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Hackmann, R. Sen, M. Haitjema, G.-C. Roman and C Gill, MobiWork: Mobile Workflow for Manets, Technical Report WUCSE-06-18, Washington University, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Jing, K. Huff, B. Hurwitz, H. Sinha, B. Robinson and M. Feblowitz, “WHAM: Supporting Mobile Workforce and Applications in Workflow Environment”, Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering, San Diego, California, USA, Feb. 27–28, 2000, pp. 31–38.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Khalaf and F. Leymann, “E Role-based Decomposition of Business Processes using BPEL”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services, Chicago, USA, Sep. 18–22, 2006, pp. 770–780.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mileti, D. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in United States. Joseph Henry Press. Washington D.C. 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Governors Association (NGA). “Volume Two: Homeland Security -A Governor’s Guide To Emergency Management”. NGA Center for Best Practices. 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nigg, J. “Emergency Response Following the 1994 Northridge Earthquake: Intergovernmental Coordination Issues,” Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Research Council: Board on Natural Disasters. “Reducing Disaster Losses Through Better Information”. National Academic Press. Washington, D.C. 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Neyem, S.F. Ochoa and J.A. Pino, “Supporting Mobile Collaboration with Service-Oriented Mobile Units”, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Groupware, Medina del Campo, Spain, Sep. 17–21, 2006, LNCS 4154, pp. 228–245.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quarantelli, E. “Major Criteria for Judging Disaster Planning and Managing and their Applicability in Developing Societies,” Background paper for the Int. Seminar on the Quality of Life and Environmental Risk. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct., 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stewart, T. and Bostrom, A. “Extreme Event Decision Making Workshop Report,” Center for Policy Research. Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy. University of Albany, and Decision Risk and Management Science Program NSF. June, 2002. (, last visit: Jan-2003).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Sen, R. Handorean, G-C. Roman and C. Gill, “Service Oriented Computing Imperatives in Ad Hoc Wireless Settings”, Service-Oriented Software System Engineering: Challenges and Practices, Stojanovic and Dahanayake (Eds.), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, USA, 2005, 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. Stojmenovic and J. Wu, “Ad-hoe Networks”, IEEE Computer, 2004, 37(2), 9–74.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Tschudin, H. Lundgren, and E. Nordström, “Embedding Manets in the Real World”, Proceedings of the Eighth IFIP International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications, Venice, Italy, Sep. 23–25, 2003, LNCS 2775, pp. 578–589.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Yang, “Web service componentization”, Communications of the ACM, 2003,46(10), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruben Dario Franco
    • 1
  • Andrés Neyem
    • 2
  • Sergio Ochoa
    • 2
  • Rosa Navarro
    • 1
  1. 1.CIGIP Research CentrePolytechnical University of ValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of ChileChile

Personalised recommendations