Barriers Driven Methodology for Enterprise Interoperability

  • David Chen
  • Nicolas Daclin
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 243)


In order to perform enterprise interoperability projects in an organised and efficient way, this paper presents a methodology which aims at helping establishing interoperability in enterprises in a step-by-step manner. A novel barrier-driven approach is adopted. An interoperability framework is elaborated to structure interoperability issues and concerns. An interoperability measurement approach is drafted to characterise the degree of interoperability achieved. A structured approach is defined showing the main phases to follow to use the interoperability framework and interoperability measurement methods.


Enterprise Architecture Collaborative Network Chief Information Officer Capability Maturity Model Interoperability Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    ATHENA. Advanced Technologies for Heterogeneous Enterprise Networks and their Applications, FP6-2002-IST-1, Integrated Project Proposal, 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    INTEROP, Annex1-Description of work, Interoperability Research for Networked Enterprises Applications and Software. INTEROP NoE. Network of Excellence, n°508011, 2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEEE, A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries, standard computer dictionary, 1990Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    IDEAS, IDEAS Project Deliverables (WP1-WP7), Public reports, www.ideas-road, 2003Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ELF, European Interoperability Framework for PAN-European EGovernment services, IDA working document -Version 4.2 -January 2004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, D., Daclin, N., Framework for enterprise interoperability, IFAC EI2N 2006, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    INTEROP, Enterprise Interoperability-Framework and knowledge corpus-Advanced report, Deliverable DI.2, DI (Domain Interoperability), December 15, 2006Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C4ISR, Architecture Working Group (AWG), Levels of Information Systems Interoperability (LISI), 30 March 1998Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kasunic, M., Anderson, W., Measuring systems interoperability: challenges and opportunities, Software engineering measurement and analysis initiative, 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    NEHTA, Towards a Health Interop Framework, 2006, ( Scholar
  11. 11.
    CMM, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute: SEI Software Engineering Process Management Program, http)://, 2004Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    NASCIO (National Association of State Chief Information Officers). NASCIO Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model, Version 1.3, 2003Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IFEAD (Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments). Extended Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model (E2AMM), 2004Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ATHENA Integrated Project (507849). Framework for the Establishment and Management Methodology, Deliverable DA1.4, 2005Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bachman, J. Service-Oriented Architecture Maturity Model,, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daclin, N., Chen, D., Vallespir, B.: Enterprise interoperability measurement -Basic concepts, Enterprise Modeling and Ontologies for Interoperability, Luxemburg, 2006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ATHENA, Guidelines and Best Practices for Applying the ATHENA Interoperability Framework to Support SME Participation in Digital Ecosystems, Deliverable DA8.2, January, 2007Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clark, T., Jones, R., Organizational Interoperability Maturity Model for C2., Department of Defense, Canberra, Australia, 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Chen
    • 1
  • Nicolas Daclin
    • 1
  1. 1.IMS-LAPSUniversity Bordeaux 1Talence cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations