Agent-Based Architecture for Virtual Enterprises to Support Agility

  • Heli Helaakoski
  • Päivi Iskanius
  • Irina Peltomaa
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 243)


Global competition forces enterprises to concentrate on their core competencies while transforming themselves to participate in emerging inter-enterprise formations following the virtual enterprise (VE) paradigm. VE is a form that offers high flexibility, agility and resilience for enterprises to survive and prosper in the globalized economy. This paper introduces the real world VE that uses agent-based software to support agility. This research is conducted as a case study in the business network, which consist of several small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) and one focal company operating in the steel manufacturing industry in Northern Finland. The new VE, called Steel Net is aiming towards global markets with the support of effective information sharing.


Agent Technology Business Network Virtual Organization Collaborative Network Virtual Enterprise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Browne J, Zhang J. Extended and virtual enterprises -similarities and differences. International Journal of Agile Management Systems 1999; 1(1): 30–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camarinha-Matos LM. Infrastructures for virtual organizations -where we are. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation -ETFA `03, 16–19 Sept. 2003, 2: 405–14.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao Q, Dowlatshahi S. The impact of alignment between virtual enterprise and information technology on business performance in an agile manufacturing environment. Journal of Operations Management 2005; 23: 531–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel EM, White A. The future of inter-organisational system linkages: findings of an international Delphi study. European Journal of Information Systems 2005; 14(2): 188–203.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davics J, Fensel D, van Harmclcn F. Towards the Semantic Web, Ontology Driven Knowledge Management. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng SC, Helaakoski H, Haapasalo H, Kipinä, J. Software agents-enabled systems coalition for integrated manufacturing processes and supply chain management. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management 2007; 11(2): 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Genesereth MR, Ketchpel SP. Software agents. Communications of the ACM 1994; 37(7): 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldman SL, Nagel RN, Preiss K. Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jagdev HS, Thoben K-D. Anatomy of enterprise collaborations. International Journal of Production Planning and Control 2001; 12(5): 437–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jennings NR, Corera JM, Laresgoiti I. Developing Industrial Multi-Agent Systems. In Proceedings of ICMAS’95, San Francisco, 1995, The AAAIpressmie MIT press, 423–30.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jennings NR, Wooldridge M. Applications of Intelligent Agents. In Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications, and Markets, NR Jennings and M Wooldridge, eds. 1998, Springer, 1998, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennings NR, Faratin P, Norman TJ, O’Brien P, Odgers B. Autonomous Agents for Business Process Management. International Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 2000; 14(2): 145–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Helaakoski H, Iskanius P, Peltomaa I, Kipinä J, Ojala K. Agent technology for supporting real-time supply chain management. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management 2006; 1(4): 360–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lau HCW, Chin KS, Pun KF, Ning A. Decision supporting functionality in a virtual enterprise network. Expert Systems with Applications 2000; 19(4): 261–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norman TJ, Preece A, Chalmers S, Jennings NR, Luck M, Dang VD, Nguyen TD, Deora V, Shao J, Gray A, Fiddian N. CONOISE: Agent-based formation of virtual organizations. In Proceedings of 23rd SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of AI, Cambridge, UK, 2003, 353-66.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Papazoglou M. Agent-oriented technology in support of e-business. Communications of the ACM 2001; 44(4): 71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shen W, Norrie DH. Agent-based systems for intelligent manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. International Journal of Knowledge and Information Systems 1999; 1(2): 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shen W, Kremer R, Ulieru M, Norrie D. A collaborative agent-based infrastructure for Internetenabled collaborative enterprises. International Journal of Production Research 2003; 41(8): 1621–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strader TJ, Lin F-R, Shaw MJ. Information infrastructure for electronic virtual organization management. Decision Support Systems 1998; 23: 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tatsiopoulus IP, Ponis ST, Hadzilias EA, Panayiotou NA. Realization of the virtual enterprise paradigm in the clothing industry through e-business technology. Production and Operations Management 2002; 11(4): 516–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu N, Su P. Selection of partners in virtual enterprise paradigm. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2005; 21 (2): 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heli Helaakoski
    • 1
  • Päivi Iskanius
    • 2
  • Irina Peltomaa
    • 1
  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Centre of FinlandRaaheFinland
  2. 2.Faculty of Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations