Advertisement

Trust Building in Collaborative Networked Organizations Supported by Communities of Practice

  • Leandro Loss
  • Claudio Henrique Schons
  • Rosane Maria Neves
  • Iliane Luft Delavy
  • Iny Salete Chudzikiewicz
  • Ana Maria Cordeiro Vogt
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 243)

Abstract

In view of the competitive scenario in which organizations are currently inserted, it is necessary for them to adopt a philosophy of continuous learning, aiming at improving their products and processes, besides encouraging an environment that allows knowledge exchange and innovation. On the one hand CNOs aim at increasing competitiveness through the flow of knowledge aggregated to products and processes in a formal environment. On the other hand, CoPs rise up as a mechanism that permeates new structures of communication, encouraging institutional learning and knowledge sharing, combining common values to their members in informal environments. The aim of this article is to propose the use of CoPs within CNOs to promote trust among members, aiding and encouraging the practices of knowledge sharing.

Keywords

Knowledge Management Knowledge Sharing Network Member Virtual Organization Trust Building 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown, L.S.; Duguid, P., 1991. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, nºl. pp. 40–57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camarinha-Matos, L. M. e Afsarmanesh, H.; 2006. Collaborative networks: Value creation in a knowledge society. Em Wang, K., Kovács, G. L., Wozny, M. J., e Fang, M, editors, PROLAMAT, volume 207 of IFIP, páginas 26–40. Springer.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coakes, E.; Clarke, S. 2006. The Concept of Communities of Practice. IN: Coakes, E.; Clarke, S. Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davenport, T.; Prusak, L. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jonassen, D.; 1996. O uso das novas tecnologias na educação a distância e a aprendizagem construtivista. INEP. ano 16, n.70.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones, G. R.; George, M.;1998. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 531–546.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karvonen, I.; Jansson, K.; Salkari, I., Ollus, M.; 2004. Challenges in the Management of Virtual Organizations. In: Balanced Automation Systems and Services BASYS’04. Vienna Austria. Proceedings. Austria Ed. Springer, p. 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kimble, C.; Li, F.; Barlow, A. 2000. Effective Virtual Teams Through Communities Of Practice. Research Paper Nº 2000/9. Management Science.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laaksonen, T.; Kulmala, H. I.; 2006. Coordinating Supplier Relations: The Role of Interorganizational Trust and Interdependence. In: PROVE-06, Eds. Camarinha-Matos, L.; Afsarmanesh, H.; Ollus, M.; Boston: Springer, pp. 191–198.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis, J.D., & Weiger, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces. Vol.63, n.4, 967–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Msanjila, S. S.; Afsarmanesh, H. 2006. Assessment and Creation of Trust in VBEs. In: PROVE-06, Eds. Camarinha-Matos, L.; Afsarmanesh, H.; Ollus, M.; pp. 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raja, J. Z.; Huq, A., Rosenberg, D. 2006. The Role of Trust in Virtual and Co-Located Communities of Practice. IN: Coakes, E; Clarke, S. Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management. Idea Group Inc. ISBN 1–59140–558-0.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sako, M.; 1992 Prices, Quality and Trust. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scarbrough, H.; Swan, J. 2002. Knowledge Communities and Innovation. IN: Huysman, M. Baalen, P. Communities of Practice. The European Institute for the Media. ISBN 9053527540.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, H. A.; Mckeen, J. D., 2003. Creating and Facilitating Communities of Practice. IN: Holsapple, C.W. Handbook on Knowledge Management. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stewart, T. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations. Currency.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Soares, A. L., de Sousa, J. P., e Barbedo, F., 2003. Modeling the structure of collaborative networks: Some contributions. Em Camarinha-Matos, L. M. e Afsarmanesh, H., editors, PRO-VE’03, volume 262 of IFIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 23–30. Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Urze, P. 2006. Industrial Network Trust Bond: A Sociological Perspective. In: PROVE-06, Eds. Camarinha-Matos, L.; Afsarmanesh, H., Ollus, M.; Boston: Springer, pp. 199–210.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vallejos, R. V.; Wolf, P.; 2006. Virtual Collaboration in the Brazilian Mould and Die Industrie. In: Kazi, A.S., and Wolf, P. (eds) Real-Life Knowledge Management: Lessons from the Field, KnowledgeBoard, ISBN: 952–5004–72–4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Terra, J. C., Gestão do conhecimento: o grande desafio empresarial, Negócio Editora, Segunda ediçâo, 200l.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Turner, Chris. O que são Comunidades de Prática?, IN:SENGE, P. et al. A Dança das Mudanças. Rio de Janeiro:Campus, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wenger, E., SNYDER, W. M. (2006). Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. In: Harbard Business Review on Organizational Learning.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolf, Patricia; Kazi, Abdul Samad (2006). Communities of Practice -A Case Study from the Automotive Industry. IN: Wolf, Patricia; Kazi, Abdul Samad (eds). Real-Life Knowledge Management: Lessons from the Field. KnowledgeBoard, ISBN: 952–5004–72–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leandro Loss
    • 1
  • Claudio Henrique Schons
    • 2
  • Rosane Maria Neves
    • 3
  • Iliane Luft Delavy
    • 3
  • Iny Salete Chudzikiewicz
    • 4
  • Ana Maria Cordeiro Vogt
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Automation and Systems, GSIGMA - Intelligent Manufacturing Systems GroupFederal University of Santa CatarinaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Information ScienceFederal University of Santa CatarinaBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Knowledge Management EngineeringFederal University of Santa CatarinaBrazil
  4. 4.Uniandrade UniversityBrazil

Personalised recommendations