Ontology Engineering in Virtual Breeding Environments

  • Dora Simões
  • Hugo Ferreira
  • António Lucas Soares
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 243)


This paper proposes a new method for managing the use of ontologies in the context of a Virtual Breeding Environment. This research work focus is on the dissolution phase of a Virtual Enterprise or Collaborative Network, where ontology segmentation techniques are user to enrich the VBE’s ontology library. Firstly, an overview of the process of ontology composition and decomposition is given and the ontology library system adopted described. Then, the ontologies’ ranking and classification method is described, explaining a set of metrics inspired in social network approaches. Finally, the results of preliminary tests are discussed.


Domain Ontology Partial Match Collaborative Network Virtual Enterprise Ontology Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Afsarmanesh, H.L. M. Camarinha-Matos (2005). A framework for management of virtual organization breeding environments. Collaborative Networks and their Breeding Environments, (PRO-VE’05), Valencia, Spain, Springer.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alani, H.C. Brewster (2005). Ontology Ranking based on the Analysis of Concept Structures. Third International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-Cap), Banff, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alani, H.C. Brewster (2006). Metrics for Ranking Ontologies. WWW2006, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alani, H., C. Brewster, et al. (2006). Ranking Ontologies with Aktiverank. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bacquet, J., P. Fatelnig, et al. (2004). An outlook of future research needs on networked organizations. Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks (PROVE’04), Toulouse, France, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buitelaar, P., T. Eigner, et al. (2004). OntoSclect: A Dynamic Ontology Library with Support for Ontology Selection. International Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding, Y.D. Fensel (2001). “Ontology Library Systems: The key to successful Ontology Re-use.” 93–112.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korpilahti, T. (2004). Arquitecture for distributed development of an ontology library. Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Helsinki, Helsinki University of Technology. Master of Science in Technology: 60.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maedche, A., B. Motik, et al. (2003). An Infrastructure for Searching, Reusing and Evolving Distributed Ontologies. WWW2003, Budapest, Hungary, ACM.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noy, N. F.M. A. Musen (2004). “Ontology versioning in an ontology management framework.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4): 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noy, N. F., D. Rubin, et al. (2004). “Making Biomedical Ontologies and Ontology Libraries Work.” EEE Intelligent Systems 19(6): 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Porter, C. E. (2004). “A Typology of Virtual Communities: A Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for Future Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC) l0((l), Article 3).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dora Simões
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hugo Ferreira
    • 1
  • António Lucas Soares
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.INESC PortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering Univ. PortoPortugal
  3. 3.ISCA Univ. AveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations