Advertisement

The Tech-Enabled Neighborhood: Findings from an experience in Tecámac, Mexico

  • Victor M. Gonzalez
  • Kenneth Kraemer
  • Luis A. Castro
  • Alladi Venkatesh
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 241)

Abstract

Following worldwide tendencies, the patterns of usage of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Mexico are being influenced by increasing affordability. In this work we present the results of a study on the use and adoption of ICTs to support daily life in residential communities conducted in Tecamac, Mexico. There, neighbors were provided with computers and broadband internet access as part of the facilities. The study consists of analysis of interviews conducted in situ with members of the community. We mainly discuss incidents and situations beyond and around the use of technology such as the services neighbors need when moving in. This study provides some insights for the design and deployment of technology in real communities on a large scale.

Keywords

Mexico City Online Shopping Housing Development Front Door Residential Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. [1]
    AMIPCI, “Hábitos de los Usuarios de Internet en México 2005.” Oct, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    INEGI, “Encuesta Nacional sobre Disponibilidad y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información en los Hogares.” 2005.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Foth and M. Brereton, “Enabling local interaction and personalized networking in residential communities through action research and participatory design,” in OZCHI 2004: Supporting community interaction, P. Hyland and L. Vrazilic, Eds. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong, 2004, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    MexicoUnido.org, “Mexico Unido por la Democracia,” in http://www.mexicounido.org/, 2006.
  5. [5]
    S. Low, “Behind the Gates,” New York and London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Foth, “Analyzing the Factors Influencing the Successful Design and Uptake of Interactive Systems to Support Social Networks in Urban Neighborhoods,” International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, vol. 2, pp. 65–82, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. M. Carroll and M. B. Rosson, “A Trajectory for Community Networks,” The Information Society, vol. 19, pp. 381–393, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Gurstein, “Community informatics, community networks and strategies for flexible networking,” Community informatics: Shaping computermediated social relations, pp. 263–283, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Corbin and A. Strauss, “Basics of Qualitative Research,” Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Intille, K. Larson, and C. Kukla, “House_n: The MIT Home of the Future Project,” MIT Dept. of Architecture. http://architecture.mit.edu/house_n, 2000.
  11. [11]
    X. Bian, G. D. Abowd, and J. M. Rehg, “Using Sound Source Localization to Monitor and Infer Activities in the Home,” Georgia Institute of Technology Report Number: GIT-GVU-04-20, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor M. Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Kenneth Kraemer
    • 2
  • Luis A. Castro
    • 1
  • Alladi Venkatesh
    • 2
  1. 1.Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of ManchesterUK
  2. 2.Paul Merage School of BusinessUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations