Policing, Terrorism, and Beyond

  • Thomas E. Feucht
  • David Weisburd
  • Simon Perry
  • Lois Felson Mock
  • Idit Hakimi


In the US, Israel, and other democratic states, the police have been called to expand beyond their order-maintenance work to participate more and more deeply in the still-forming processes that are our societies’ adaptive responses to terrorism. As the US and Israel work to achieve and maintain order and safety in an age of terrorism, these efforts must be understood in relation to the ongoing work dealing with other persistent challenges to public safety. Engaging the police in fighting terrorism raises some unresolved dilemmas for society. The chapters in this volume have begun the complex work of uncovering how this transformative engagement of the police is already making subtle but likely irrevocable changes in the nature and strategies of policing and the character of the bonds between police and community. This chapter summarizes the key findings of the volume, examines the broader context confronting the police in an age of terrorism and beyond, and identifies areas for future research.


Police Officer Local Police Terrorist Organization Minority Community Police Agency 


  1. Bayley, D., and C. Nixon (forthcoming). The changing environment for policing, 1985–2008. New Perspective in Policing Harvard Kennedy School and the National Institute for Justice Executive Session on Policing.Google Scholar
  2. Brodeur, J.-P. 1983. High and low policing: Remarks about the policing of political activities. Social Problems 30(5):507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodeur, J.-P. 2007. High and low policing in post-9/11 times. Policing 1(1):25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies, H. J., and G. R. Murphy. 2004. Protecting Your Community from Terrorism: Strategies for Local Law Enforcement, Vol. 2: Working With Diverse Communities. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum. http://www.policeforum.org/upload/wp2_925579737_322006144428.pdf (accessed November 6, 2008).
  5. Eck, J. E. (1994). Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  6. Fact Sheet: Foreign Terrorist Organizations. 2008. Washington, DC: State Department, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/08/103392.htm(accessed April 8, 2008).
  7. Fussey, P. 2007. Observing potentiality in the global city: Surveillance and counterterrorism in London. International Criminal Justice Review 17(3):171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gascon, G., and T. Foglesong (forthcoming). Are police departments pricing themselves out of (the) business? New Perspective in Policing Harvard Kennedy School and the National Institute for Justice Executive Session on Policing.Google Scholar
  9. Henderson, N. J., C. W. Ortiz, N. F. Sugie, and J. Miller. 2008. Policing in Arab-American Communities after September 11. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/221706.pdf(accessed November 6, 2008).
  10. Hoffman, B. 2008. The myth of grass-roots terrorism: Why Osama bin Laden still matters. Foreign Affairs, May/June. http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20080501fareviewessay87310/bruce-hoffman/the-myth-of-grass-roots-terrorism.html (accessed November 6, 2008).
  11. Hollywood, J., K. Strom, and M. Pope. 2008. Developing and Testing a Method for Using 911 Calls for Identifying Potential Pre-Planning Terrorist Surveillance Activities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/222911.pdf (accessed November 6, 2008).
  12. Ignatius, D. 2008. The Fading Jihadists. Washington Post, February 28.Google Scholar
  13. Jonathan, T. (forthcoming). The relationship between police involvement in counter-terrorism and public attitudes toward the police among majority communities in Israel: 1998–2007Google Scholar
  14. Local Law Enforcement’s Role in Preventing and Responding to Terrorism, Discussion Draft. 2001. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum. http://www.policeforum.org/upload/terrorismfinal%5B1%5D_715866088_12302005135139.pdf (accessed November 6, 2008).
  15. Lum, C. 2005. Tip Line Technologies: Intelligence Gathering and Analysis Systems: Phase I Final Report and Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/211677.pdf (accessed November 6, 2008).
  16. MI5 tracking ‘30 UK terror plots’. 2006. BBC News, November 10. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6134516.stm (accessed November 6, 2008).
  17. Newport, F. 2008. Confidence in institutions. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1597/Confidence-Institutions.aspx(accessed November 6, 2008).
  18. Neyroud, P., and E. Disley. 2008. Technology and policing: Implications for fairness and legitimacy. Policing 2(2):226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parsons, T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Rheault, M. 2007. Many world citizens trust neighbors more than police. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/102346/Many-World-Citizens-Trust-Neighbors-More-Than-Police.aspx (accessed November 6, 2008).
  21. Roman, J. K., S. Reid, J. Reid, A. Chalfin, W. Adams, and C. Knight. 2008. The DNA Field Experiment: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of DNA in the Investigation of High-Volume Crimes. Washington DC: US Department of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/222318.pdf (accessed November 6, 2008).
  22. Segell, G. M. 2006. Terrorism on London public transport. Defense & Security Analysis 22(1):45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sherman, L. W. 2002. Trust and confidence in criminal justice, National Institute of Justice Journal 248:22–31.Google Scholar
  24. Sherman, L. W., and D. Weisburd. 1995. General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly 12(4):625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skogan, W. G., L. Steiner, J. DuBois, E. J. Gudell, and A. Fagan. 2002. Community Policing and “The New Immigrants”: Latinos in Chicago. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/189908.pdf (accessed November 6, 2008).
  26. Terror suspects were ‘tipped off’. 2007. CNN News, September 10. http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/09/10/germany.terror/index.html (accessed November 6, 2008).
  27. To Protect and Defend: Challenges to Public Safety and Homeland Security Facing the Next US President. US: The International Association of Chiefs of Police. http://www.theiacp.org/documents/protectdefend.pdf (accessed August 28, 2008).
  28. Weisburd, D., and A. A. Braga. 2003. Hot spots policing. In Crime Prevention: New Approaches, eds. H. Kury and O. Fuchs, Mainz, Germany: Weisner Ring.Google Scholar
  29. Weisburd, D., and J. Eck. 2004. What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593:42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weisburd, D., T. Jonathan, and S. Perry. (forthcoming) The Israeli model for policing terrorism: Goals, strategies, and open questions. Criminal Justice and Behavior.Google Scholar
  31. Welsh, B. C., and D. P. Farrington. 2003a. Effects of closed-circuit television on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587:110–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Welsh, B. C., and D. P. Farrington. 2003b. Effects of Closed Circuit Television Surveillance on Crime: Protocol for a Systematic Review. Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/campbell_library/index.php (accessed December 8, 2008).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas E. Feucht
    • 1
  • David Weisburd
    • 1
  • Simon Perry
    • 1
  • Lois Felson Mock
    • 1
  • Idit Hakimi
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of JusticeWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations