Tracking Global Terrorism Trends, 1970–2004



Terrorism is a form of crime. Yet compared to most types of crime, terrorism poses unique data collection challenges. As a result, even basic descriptive questions about terrorism have been difficult or impossible to answer: What are the long-term trends in terrorist attacks? Is the number of fatalities associated with terrorist attacks increasing over time? What types of attacks are most common? What types of weapons do terrorists use most frequently? How long do terrorist groups last? In this chapter, we analyze data from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) to provide a descriptive account of more than 82,000 domestic and international terrorist attacks that occurred between 1970 and 2004. We provide detailed information on global and country-level terrorism trends, regional characteristics of terrorism, and characteristics of the major groups that have employed terrorist methods. We also examine how terrorism rates compare to more common forms of crime. We conclude with a discussion about important research questions for the future.


Terrorist Attack Terrorist Group Homicide Rate Democratic Country Global Terrorism Database 



Support for this work was provided by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), grant number 2002-DT-CX-0001 and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through the National Center for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), grant number N00140510629. We would like to thank Erin Miller, Susan Fahey and Brandon Behlendorf for assistance with data analysis. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NIJ or DHS.


  1. M.F. Aebi, M. Killias, and C. Tavares. 2003. Comparing Crime Rates: The International Crime (Victim) Survey, the European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics, and INTERPOL Statistics. In: H. Kury (ed). International Comparison of Crime and Victimization. pp. 22–37 International Comparison of Crime and Victimization. Ontario: de Sitter.Google Scholar
  2. D. Archer and R. Gartner. 1984. Violence and Crime in Cross-National Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. R.H. Bates, D.L. Epstein, J.A. Goldstone, T.R. Gurr, B. Harff, C.H. Kahl, M.A. Levy, M. Lustik, M.G. Marshall, T.M. Parris, J. Ulfelder, and M.R. Woodward. 2006. Political Instability Task Force Report: Phase IV Findings. Mclean, VA: SAIC.Google Scholar
  4. D.H. Bayley and D. Weisburd. 2008. The Role of Police in Counter-terrorism. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  5. W.S. Carus. 2006. Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction, National Defense University.Google Scholar
  6. P. Chalk. 1998. The response to terrorism as a threat to liberal democracy. Australian Journal of Politics and History 44:373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. R.D. Crelinsten. 1998. The discourse and practice of counter-terrorism in liberal democracies. Australian Journal of Politics and History 44:389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Crenshaw. 1981. The causes of terrorism. Comparative Politics 13:379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Defense. 2007. Joint Publication 1–02, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, 12 April 2001 (as amended through 12 July, 2007).Google Scholar
  10. Dugan, Laura, Gary LaFree, Kim Cragin, and Anna Kasupski. 2008. Building and Analyzing an Open Source Comprehensive Data Base on Global Terrorist Events. A Final Report to the National Institute of Justice for Grant # 2005-IJ-CX-0002.Google Scholar
  11. L. Dugan, G. LaFree, and A. Piquero. 2005. Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings. Criminology 43:1031–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D.S. Elliott, D. Huizinga, and S. Menard. 1989. Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Abuse, and Mental Health Problems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. W. Enders and T. Sandler. 2006. The Political Economy of Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. D.C. Esty, J. Goldstone, T.R. Gurr, P.T. Surko, and A.N. Unger. 1995. Working Papers: State Failure Task Force Report. McLean, Virginia: Science Applications International Corporation.Google Scholar
  15. W. Eubank and L. Weinberg. 1994. Does democracy encourage terrorism? Terrorism and Political Violence 6:417–435.Google Scholar
  16. W. Eubank and L. Weinberg. 1998. Terrorism and democracy: what recent events disclose. Terrorism and Political Violence 10:108–118.Google Scholar
  17. J. Eyerman. 1998. Terrorism and democratic states: soft targets or accessible systems. International Interactions 24:151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. B. Ganor. 2005. The Counter-Terrorism Puzzle: A Guide for Decision Makers. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  19. T.R. Gurr. 1974. Persistence and change in political systems, 1800–1971. American Political Science Review 68:1482–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. T.R. Gurr, K. Jaggers, and W. Moore. 1990. The transformation of the western state: the growth of democracy, autocracy, and state power since 1800. Studies in Comparative International Development 25:73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. M.S. Hamm. 2007. Terrorism as Crime. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. B. Hoffman. 1998. Recent Trends and Future Prospects of Terrorism in the United States. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
  23. K. Jaggers and T.R. Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy’s third wave with the polity data. Journal of Peace Research 32:469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. B.M. Jenkins. 1975. International Terrorism: A New Model of Conflict. In: D. Carlton and C. Schaerf (eds). International Terrorism and World Security. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  25. B.M. Jenkins. 1985. International Terrorism: The Other World War. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, R–3302-AF.Google Scholar
  26. B.M. Jenkins. 2007. The New Age of Terrorism. National Security Research Division, RAND. (accessed November 5, 2008).Google Scholar
  27. J. Junger-Tas, G-J. Terlouw, and W.K. Malcolm (eds). 1994. Delinquent Behavior among Young People in the Western World: First Results of the International Self-Report Delinquency Study, Studies on Crime and Justice. Amsterdam: Kugler.Google Scholar
  28. C.B. Kalish. 1988. International Crime Rates: Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  29. A. Krueger D. Laitin. 2004 Misunderstanding terrorism. Foreign Affairs 83:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. G. LaFree. 1999. Homicide: Cross-National Perspectives. In: M.D. Smith and M.A. Zahn (eds). Studying and Preventing Homicide: Issues and Challenges. pp. 115–139, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. G. LaFree and L. Dugan. 2002. The Impact of Economic, Political, and Social Variables on the Incidence of World Terrorism, 1970 to 1997. Grant proposal to the National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  32. G. LaFree and L. Dugan. 2005. Building and Analyzing a Comprehensive Open Source Database on Global Terrorism Events, 1968 to 2005. Grant proposal to the National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  33. G. LaFree and L. Dugan. 2007. Introducing the global terrorism data base. Terrorism and Political Violence 19:181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. G. LaFree and A. Tseloni. 2006. Democratization and crime: a multilevel analysis of homicide trends in 43 nations, 1950 to 2000. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605:26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. G. LaFree, L. Dugan, and D. Franke. 2005. The interplay between terrorism, nonstate actors, and weapons of mass destruction: an exploration of the Pinkerton database. International Studies Review Forum 7:155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. G. LaFree, L. Dugan, and S. Fahey. 2007. Global Terrorism and Failed States. In: J.J. Hewitt, J. Wilkenfeld, and T.R. Gurr. Peace and Conflict. pp. 39–54, Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  37. Q. Li. 2005. Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? Journal of Conflict Resolution 49:278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. J. Lynch. 1995. Crime in International Perspective. In: J.Q. Wilson and J. Petersilia (eds). Crime. pp. 11–37, San Francisco: ICS.Google Scholar
  39. A. Merari. 1991. Academic research and government policy on terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 3:88–102.Google Scholar
  40. S.F. Messner and R. Rosenfeld. 1997. Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: a cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Social Forces 75:1393–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. J.L. Neapolitan. 1997. Cross-National Crime: A Research Review and Sourcebook. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  42. R.M. O’Brien. 1996. Police productivity and crime rates: 1973–1992. Criminology 34:183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Z. Phillips. 2007. A feel for numbers. Government Executive 1:51–60.Google Scholar
  44. T. Sandler. 1995. On the relationship between democracy and terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 7:1–9.Google Scholar
  45. B.L. Smith and G.P. Orvis. 1993. America’s response to terrorism: an empirical analysis of federal intervention strategies during the 1980s. Justice Quarterly 10:661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. US State Department. 2003. Patterns of Global Terrorism. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  47. J. Van Dijk, P. Mayhew, and M. Killias. 1989. Experiences of Crime across the World: Key Findings of the 1989 International Crime Survey. The Hague, The Netherlands: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  48. J. Wilkenfeld. 2007. Unstable States and International Crises. In: J. Hewitt, J. Wilkenfeld, and T.R. Gurr (eds). Peace and Conflict 2008. pp. 67–78, Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  49. J. Young. 2007. State Capacity and Political Violence. University of Maryland, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), and Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of MarylandMDUSA

Personalised recommendations