This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Radio Frequency Ablation is delivered by inserting a closed umbrella-like instrument under fluoroscopy that is opened once placed to deliver radiofrequency energy to the tumor mass heating the tissue to a temperature that will result in cell necrosis.
Lara PN, Jr, Higdon R, Lim N et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment, J Clin Oncol, 2001; 19(6) (March):1728–1733.
Comis RL, Aldige CR, Stovall EL. et al. A Quantitative Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Cancer Clinical Trials, 2000, Coalition of National Cancer Cooperative Groups.
Foster C. The Ethics of Medical Research on Humans, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Institutional Review Boards/Research Ethics Boards are the US/Canadian based committees charged with reviewing all clinical trials before being offered to patients.
Zlotnik SR. Reviewing the reviewers: the vague accountability of research ethics committees, Critical Care 2002; 6:121–122.
Amdur, Robert J, Bankert, Elizabeth A. Institutional Review Board: Management and Function, Jones & Bartlett, 2002.
Angelos, P, Murphy, T, Sampson, H et al. Informed consent, capitation, and conflicts of interest in clinical trials: Views form the field, Surgery 2006;140(5):740–748.
Eckenwiler L. Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects, Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2001; 11(1):37–69, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eckstein, S. (ed.), Manual for Research Ethics Committees, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
11.Glannon, W. Phase I oncology trials: why the therapeutic misconception will not go away, J Med Ethics 2006;32:252–255; doi:10.1136/jme.2005.015685.
Agrawal M, Grady C, Fairclough D, et al. Patients’ decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research, J Clin Oncol Sept 20, 2006; 24 (27):4479–4484.
Corbett F, Oldham J, Lilford R. Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants, J Med Ethics 1996; 22:227–231.
Macklin R. The ethical problems with sham surgery in clinical research, N Engl J Med 1999; 341:992–996.
Final Report of the National Placebo Initiative (NPI) http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/25139.html, accessed Nov 2006.
http://www.aahrpp.org, accessed January 2007.
http://www.lcc.gc.ca/en/themes/gr/hrish/macdonald/macdonald_main. asp, accessed November 2006.
Hearnshaw, H. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study, BMJ 2004; 328:140–141, doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7432.140.
Emmanuel, Ezekiel J., Wendler, David, Grady, Christine, What makes clinical research ethical?, JAMA, May 24/31, 2000-Vol 283, No 20 2701–2711.
http://www.ich.org/, http://www.nserc.ca/programs/ethics/english/, http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca, accessed December 2006.
Weijer, C, Shapiro, S., Fuks, A., Glass, KC., Scrutkowska, M., Monitoring clinical research: an obligation unfulfilled, CMAJ, 1995; 152:1973–1980.
Civil Code of Quebec, Book I (1991, c.64) Title Two, Chapter I, Section I; 21.
Greenwood B, Hausdorff WP. After a trial is over: the ethical issues,Science and Development Network, www.scidev.net, 24 November 2003.
Lemmens, T. In the name of national security: lessons from the final report on the human radiation experiments. Eur J Health Law, 1999; 6:7–23.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report(Washington, DC: DHEW Publications OS 78–0012,1978).
Final Report of the National Placebo Initiative (NPI) http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/25139.html, accessed November 2006.
http://www.ocrn.on.ca/ethics_AboutOCREB.htm, accessed January 2007.
http://www.ncicirb.org/, accessed January 2007.
Globe and Mail Canadian National Newspaper –http://www.theglobe andmail.com, accessed Nov 2006.
http://www.gnn.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=246831&NewsAreaID=2, accessed January 2007.
Pearson, SD, Miller FG, Emmanuel EJ, Medicare’s requirement fir research participation as a condition of coverage, JAMA, 2006; 298(8):988–991.
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation. The Human Radiation Experiments (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
Editorial, How consumers can and should improve clinical trials, Lancet, 2002; 357:1721.
Greenwood B, Hausdorff WP, After a trial is over: the ethical issues, Science and Development Network, www.scidev.net, 24 November 2003.
Credit for this clinical trials ribbon campaign idea rightfully goes to Donald E. Short, LLB and member of the Princess Margaret Hospital Research Ethics Board.
DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors ,JAMA 2004; 292:1363–1364.
Drazen JM, Zarin DA, Salvation by Registration, NEJM 356;2 www.nejm.org, January 11, 2007.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/,accessed January 2007.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2001), 5thEdn, Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sampson, H. (2008). Research Ethics and the Ethics of Research: Should We Offer Clinical Trial Participation or Clinical Research Partnership to Oncology Patients in the New Millennium?. In: Angelos, P. (eds) Ethical Issues in Cancer Patient Care Second Edition. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 140. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73639-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73639-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73638-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-73639-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)