Breast MRI pp 209-220 | Cite as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety and Patient Considerations


Safety is crucial at every MRI site.1–5 Most hospitals and outpatient facilities have established safety procedures for MRI; breast MRI is just one of many MR examinations falling under such procedures. MR safety issues may be less familiar to breast imaging centers that have added dedicated breast MRI to their imaging procedures. In either case, the safety of patients, site workers, and visitors entering the MRI suite is a major concern.


Static Magnetic Field Specific Absorption Rate Radiofrequency Fields Ferromagnetic Object Site Personnel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology, 2004;232:635–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shellock FG. Magnetic Resonance Procedures. Health Effects and Safety. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, ACR Guidance Document for Safe MR Practices: 2007. Am. J. of Roentgenology 2007; 188: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radiology Websites: MRI Safety Websites:, last accessed 2/1/07.
  5. 5.
    Shellock FG. is an invaluable website for MRI safety, last accessed 2/1/07.
  6. 6.
    Shellock FG. Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety and Implants: 2007 Edition. Biomedical Research Publishing Group, Los Angeles, CA, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices, July 14, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schenck JF. Health effects and safety of static magnetic fields. In: Shellock FG, ed. Magnetic resonance procedures: health effects and safety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001; pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schenck JF. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12; 2–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schenck JF, Dumoulin CL, Redington RW, Kressel HY, Elliott RT, McDougall IL. Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. Medical Physics 1992; 19: 1089–1098.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shellock FG. Bioeffects of gradient magnetic fields. Available at, last accessed 2/1/07.
  12. 12.
    Abart J, Eberhardt K, Fischer H, et al. Peripheral nerve stimulation by time-varying magnetic fields. J Comput Assis Tomogr 1997; 21: 532–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Schaefer DJ. Physiologic effects of intense MRI gradient fields. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 1999; 9: 363–377.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA. Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 20–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    FDA (USDHHS), Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, Office of Device Evaluation, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose, Throat and Radiological Devices, Computed Image Device Branch, 1997 (
  16. 16.
    Brummett RE, Talbot JM, Charuhas P. Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 169: 539–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shellock FG, Kanal E. Policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1991; 1: 97–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kanal E, Gillen J, Evans JA, et al. Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers. Radiology 1993; 187: 395–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Personalised recommendations