Recovery of Function in the Avian Auditory System After Ototrauma

  • James C. Saunders
  • Richard J. Salvi
Part of the Springer Handbook of Auditory Research book series (SHAR, volume 33)


Hair Cell Tuning Curve Otoacoustic Emission Cochlear Nerve Tectorial Membrane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvarez-Buylla A, Ling CY, Yu WS (1994) Contribution of neurons born during embryonic, juvenile, and adult life to the brain of adult canaries: regional specificity and delayed birth of neurons in the song-control nuclei. J Comp Neurol 347:233–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Buylla A, Seri B, Doetsch F (2002) Identification of neural stem cells in the adult vertebrate brain. Brain Res Bull 57:751–758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askew CH, Bateman K, Saunders JC, Gratton MA (2006) Ultrastuctural analysis of the tegmentum vasculosum after intense sound. Abs Assoc Res Otolaryngol 29:14.Google Scholar
  4. Brix J, Manley GA (1994) Mechanical and electromechanical properties of the stereovillar bundles of isolated and cultured hair cells of the chicken. Hear Res 76:147–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown AM, McDowell B, Forge A (1989) Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 42:143–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brownell WE (1990) Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 11:82–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkard R, Salvi R, Chen L (1996) 2f1–f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level. Audiol Neurootol 1:197–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen L, Salvi RJ, Hashino E (1993) Recovery of CAP threshold and amplitude in chickens following kanamycin ototoxicity. Hear Res 69:15–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen L, Salvi R, Shero M (1994) Cochlear frequency-place map in adult chickens: intracellular biocytin labeling. Hear Res 81:130–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen L, Trautwein PG, Miller K, Salvi RJ (1995) Effects of kanamycin ototoxicity and hair cell regeneration on the DC endocochlear potential in adult chickens. Hear Res 89:28–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen L, Trautwein PG, Shero M, Salvi RJ (1996) Tuning, spontaneous activity and tonotopic map in chicken cochlear ganglion neurons following sound-induced hair cell loss and regeneration. Hear Res 98:152–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen L, Trautwein PG, Powers N, Salvi RJ (1997) Two-tone rate suppression boundaries of cochlear ganglion neurons in chickens following acoustic trauma. J Acoust Soc Am 102:2245–2254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen L, Sun W, Salvi RJ (2001) Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from the chicken ear. Hear Res 161:54–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen YE, Saunders JC (1993) The effects of sound overexposure on the spectral response patterns of nucleus magnocellularis in the neonatal chick. Exp Brain Res 95:202–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cotanche DA (1987a) Regeneration of hair cell stereociliary bundles in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res 30:181–196.Google Scholar
  16. Cotanche DA (1987b) Regeneration of the tectorial membrane in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res 30:197–206.Google Scholar
  17. Cotanche DA (1997) Hair cell regeneration in the avian cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 168:9–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cotanche DA (1999) Structural recovery from sound and aminoglycoside damage in the avian cochlea. Audiol Neurootol 4:271–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cotanche DA, Lee KH, Stone JS, Picard DA (1994) Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage. Anat Embryol 189:1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (1985) The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells. J Physiol 364:359–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Crumling MA, Saunders JC (2007) Tonotopic distribution of short-term adaptation properties in the cochlear nerve of normal and acoustically overexposed chicks. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:54–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dallos P, Fakler B (2002) Prestin, a new type of motor protein. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:104–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duckert LG, Rubel EW (1993) Morphological correlates of functional recovery in the chicken inner ear after gentamycin treatment. J Comp Neurol 331:75–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Durham D, Park DL, Girod DA (2000) Central nervous system plasticity during hair cell loss and regeneration. Hear Res 147:145–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ernfors P, Van De Water T, Loring J, Jaenisch R (1995) Complementary roles of BDNF and NT-3 in vestibular and auditory development. Neuron 14:1153–1164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer FP (1994) Quantitative analysis of the innervation of the chicken basilar papilla. Hear Res 61:167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer FP, Miltz C, Singer I, Manley GA (1992) Morphological gradients in the starling basilar papilla. J Morphol 213:225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forge A (1996) Sensory cell regeneration and functional recovery: a review. In Axelsson A, Borchgrevink H, Hamernik RP, Hellstrom P-A, Henderson D, Salvi RJ (eds) Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Thieme, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  29. Froymovich O, Rebala V, Salvi RJ, Rassael H (1995) Long-term effect of acoustic trauma on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chickens. J Acoust Soc Am 97:3021–3029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuchs PA, Nagai T, Evans MG (1988) Electrical tuning in hair cells isolated from the chick cochlea. J Neurosci 8:2460–2467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Furman AC, Avissar M, Saunders JC (2006) Phase locking in cochlear nerve units of the chick (Gallus domesticus) exposed to intense sound. Eur J Neurosci 24:2003–2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Girod DA, Tucci DL, Rubel EW (1991) Anatomical correlates of functional recovery in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Laryngoscope 101:1139–1149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray L, Rubel EW (1985) Development of absolute threshold in chickens. J Acoust Soc Am 77:1162–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gummer AW, Smolders JW, Klinke R (1987) Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Mössbauer technique. Hear Res 29:63–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hara J, Plymale DR, Shepard DL, Hara H, Garry RF, Yoshihara T, Zenner HP, Bolton M, Kalkeri R, Fermin CD (2002) Avian dark cells. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259:121–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. He DZ, Beisel KW, Chen L, Ding DL, Jia S, Fritzsch B, Salvi R (2003) Chick hair cells do not exhibit voltage-dependent somatic motility. J Physiol 546:511–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hennig AK, Cotanche DA (1998) Regeneration of cochlear efferent nerve terminals after gentamycin damage. J Neurosci 18:3282–3296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Henry WR, Mulroy MJ (1995) Afferent synaptic changes in auditory hair cells during noise-induced temporary threshold shift. Hear Res. 84, 81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hofstetter P, Ding D, Powers N, Salvi RJ (1997) Quantitative relationship of carboplatin dose to magnitude of inner and outer hair cell loss and the reduction in distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude in chinchillas. Hear Res 112:199–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Husmann KR, Morgan AS, Girod DA, Durham D (1998) Round window administration of gentamicin: a new method for the study of ototoxicity of cochlear hair cells. Hear Res 125:109–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ipakchi R, Kyin T, Saunders JC (2005) Loss and recovery of sound evoked otoacoustic emissions in young chick following acoustic trauma. Audiol Neurootol 10:209–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kachar B, Parakkal M, Kurc M, Zhao Y, Gillespie PG (2000) High-resolution structure of hair-cell tip links. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13336–13341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Köppl C, Wegscheider A, Gleich O, Manley GA (2000) A quantitative study of cochlear afferent axons in birds. Hear Res 139:123–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Köppl C, Forge A, Manley GA (2004) Low density of membrane particles in auditory hair cells of lizards and birds suggests an absence of somatic motility. J Comp Neurol 479:149–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lifshitz J, Furman AC, Altman KW, Saunders JC (2004) Spatial tuning curves along the chick basilar papilla in normal and sound-exposed ears. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:171–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lippe WR (1991) Reduction and recovery of neuronal size in the cochlear nucleus of the chicken following aminoglycoside intoxication. Hear Res 51:193–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manley GA (2000) Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11736–11743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manley GA (2001) Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in non mammals. J Neurophysiol 86:541–549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Manley GA, Schulze M, Oeckinghaus H (1987) Otoacoustic emissions in a song bird. Hear Res 26:257–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Manley GA, Gleich O, Kaiser A, Brix J (1989) Functional differentiation of sensory cells in the avian auditory periphery. J Comp Physiol A 164:289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Manley GA, Kirk DL, Köppl C, Yates GK (2001) In vivo evidence for a cochlear amplifier in the hair-cell bundle of lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2826–2831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Markin VS, Hudspeth AJ (1995) Gating-spring models of mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells of the internal ear. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 24:59–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McFadden EA, Saunders JC (1989) Recovery of auditory function following intense sound exposure in the neonatal chick. Hear Res 41:205–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Müller M, Smolders JW (1998) Hair cell regeneration after local application of gentamicin at the round window of the cochlea in the pigeon. Hear Res 120:25–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Müller M, Smolders JW (1999) Responses of auditory nerve fibers innervating regenerated hair cells after local application of gentamicin at the round window of the cochlea in the pigeon. Hear Res 131:153–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Müller M, Smolders JW, Ding-Pfennigdorff D, Klinke R (1996) Regeneration after tall hair cell damage following severe acoustic trauma in adult pigeons: correlation between cochlear morphology, compound action potential responses and single fiber properties in single animals. Hear Res 102:133–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Müller M, Smolders J, Ding-Pfennigdorff D, Klink R (1997) Discharge properties of pigeon single auditory nerve fibers after recovery from severe acoustic trauma. Int J Dev Neurosci 15:401–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Norton SJ, Rubel EW (1990) Active and passive ADP components in mammalian and avian ears. In Dallos P, Geisler CD, Matthews JW, Ruggero MA, Steele CR (eds) Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 219–226.Google Scholar
  59. Nuttall AL, Ren T (1995) Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 92:170–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ofsie MS, Cotanche DA (1996) Distribution of nerve fibers in the basilar papilla of normal and sound-damaged chick cochleae. J Comp Neurol 370:281–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ofsie MS, Hennig AK, Messana EP, Cotanche DA (1997) Sound damage and gentamicin treatment produce different patterns of damage to the efferent innervation of the chick cochlea. Hear Res 113:207–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Park DL, Girod DA, Durham D (1998) Evidence for loss and recovery of chick brainstem auditory neurons during gentamicin-induced cochlear damage and regeneration. Hear Res 126:84–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Park DL, Girod DA, Durham D (2002) Avian brainstem neurogenesis is stimulated during cochlear hair cell regeneration. Brain Res 949:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Plontke SK, Lifshitz J, Saunders J.C (1999) Distribution of rate-intensity function types in chick cochlear nerve after exposure to intense sound. Brain Res 842:262–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Poje CP, Sewell DA, Saunders JC (1995) The effects of exposure to intense sounds on the DC endocochlear potential in the chick. Hear Res 82:197–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1991) A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2027–2067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pujol R, Puel JL (1999) Excitotoxicity, synaptic repair, and functional recovery in the mammalian cochlea: a review of recent findings. Ann NY Acad Sci 884:249–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ramakrishna R, Kurian R, Saunders JC, Gratton MA (2004) Recovery of the tegmentum vasculosum in the noise exposed chick. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol 27:65.Google Scholar
  69. Reng D, Müller M, Smolders JW (2001) Functional recovery of hearing following ampa-induced reversible disruption of hair cell afferent synapses in the avian inner ear. Audiol Neurootol 6:66–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reyes S, Ding D, Sun W, Salvi R (2001) Effect of inner and outer hair cell lesions on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 158:139–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ricci AJ, Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (2000) Active hair bundle motion linked to fast transducer adaptation in auditory hair cells. J Neurosci 20:7131–7142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Rubel EW, Hyson RL, Durham D (1990) Afferent regulation of neurons in the brain stem auditory system. J Neurobiol 21:169–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ryals BM, Dooling RJ (1996) Changes in innervation and auditory sensitivity following acoustic trauma and hair cell regeneration in birds. In Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Fiorino F, Colletti V (eds) Auditory Plasticity and Regeneration: Basic Science and Clinical Implications. New York: Thieme, pp. 84–99.Google Scholar
  74. Ryals BM, Ten Eyck B, Westbrook EW (1989) Ganglion cell loss continues during hair cell regeneration. Hear Res 43:81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ryals BM, Stalford MD, Lambert PR, Westbrook EW (1995) Recovery of noise-induced changes in the dark cells of the quail tegmentum vasculosum. Hear Res 83:51–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ryugo DK, Parks TN (2003) Primary innervation of the avian and mammalian cochlear nucleus. Brain Res Bull 60:435–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Salt AN, Melichar I, Thalmann R (1987) Mechanisms of endocochlear potential generation by stria vascularis. Laryngoscope 97:984–991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Salvi RJ, Saunders SS, Hashino E, Chen L (1994) Discharge patterns of chicken cochlear ganglion neurons following kanamycin-induced hair cell loss and regeneration. J Comp Physiol A 174:351–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Saunders JC, Doan DE, Poje CP, Fisher, KA (1996a) Cochlear nerve activity after intense sound exposure in neonatal chicks. J Neurophysiol 76:770–787.Google Scholar
  80. Saunders JC, Doan DE, Cohen YE, Adler HJ, Poje CP (1996b) Recent observations on the recovery of structure and function in the sound damaged chick ear. In Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Fiorino F, Colletti V (eds) Auditory Plasticity and Regeneration: Basic Science and Clinical Implications. New York: Thieme, pp. 62–83.Google Scholar
  81. Saunders JC, Adler HJ, Cohen YE, Smullen S, Kazahaya K (1998) Morphometric changes in the chick nucleus magnocellularis following acoustic overstimulation. J Comp Neurol 390:412–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Saunders JC, Ventetuolo CE, Plontke SK, Weiss BA (2002) Coding of sound intensity in the chick cochlear nerve. J Neurophysiol 88:2887–2898.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shero M, Salvi RJ, Chen L, Hashino E (1998) Excitotoxic effect of kainic acid on chicken cochlear afferent neurons. Neurosci Lett 257:81–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith CA (1985) Inner ear. In King A, MacLeland J (eds) Form and Function in Birds. New York: Academic Press, pp. 273–310.Google Scholar
  85. Smolders JWT (1999) Functional recovery in the avian ear after hair cell regeneration. Audiol Neurootol 4:286–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smolders JWT, Ding-Pfenningdorff D, Klinke R (1995) A functional map of the pigeon basilar papilla: correlation of the properties of single auditory nerve fibers and their peripheral origin. Hear Res 92:151–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Spassova MA, Avissar M, Furman AC, Crumling MA, Saunders JC, Parsons TD (2004) Evidence that rapid vesicle replenishment of the synaptic ribbon mediates recovery from short-term adaptation at the hair cell afferent synapse. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:376–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Amiel C (1988) Production of inner ear fluids. Physiol Rev 68:1083–1128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Stone JS, Rubel EW (2000) Cellular studies of auditory hair cell regeneration in birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11714–11721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sun H, Salvi RJ, Ding, DL, Hashino DE, Shero M, Zheng, XY (2000) Excitotoxic effect of kainic acid on chicken otoacoustic emissions and cochlear potentials. J Acoust Soc Amer 107:36–2142.Google Scholar
  91. Sun H, Hashino E, Ding DL, Salvi RJ (2001) Reversible and irreversible damage to cochlear afferent neurons by kainic acid excitotoxicity. J Comp Neurol 430:172–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sun W, Chen L, Salvi RJ (2002) Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in chickens. Audiol Neurootol 7:206–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Trautwein P, Salvi RJ, Miller K, Shero M, Hashino E (1996) Incomplete recovery of chicken distortion product otoacoustic emissions following acoustic overstimulation. Audiol Neurootol 1:86–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Trautwein PG, Chen L, Salvi RJ (1997) Steady state EP is not responsible for hearing loss in adult chickens following acoustic trauma. Hear Res 110:266–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tucci DL, Rubel EW (1990) Physiologic status of regenerated hair cells in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 103:443–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. von Békésy G (1952) Gross localization of the place of origin of the cochlear microphonics. J Acoust Soc Am 24:399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. von Békésy G (1960) Experiments in Hearing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  98. Vossieck T, Schermuly L, Klinke R (1991) The influence of DC-polarization of the endocochlear potential on single fibre activity in the pigeon cochlear nerve. Hear Res 56:93–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang J, Powers NL, Hofstetter P, Trautwein P, Ding D, Salvi R (1997) Effects of selective inner hair cell loss on auditory nerve fiber threshold, tuning and spontaneous and driven discharge rate. Hear Res 107:67–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Warchol ME, Dallos P (1990) Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol A 166:721–734.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zheng J, Madison LD, Oliver D, Fakler B, Dallos P (2002) Prestin, the motor protein of outer hair cells. Audiol Neurootol 7:9–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Saunders
  • Richard J. Salvi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations