Advertisement

Physician and Defendant: Living and Coping with a Double Life

  • Sara Charles

After a bad outcome and, later, as named defendants in civil litigation, physicians, unbeknownst to others, often begin to feel as though they are living a double life. They are concerned about their affected patient and continue to devote themselves to their work with patients as though nothing has happened, but, at another level, they are preoccupied with their own concerns about survival, protecting themselves against anxiety and hurt, and devoting their time to defending their good name.

How can they manage their seemingly conflicted, but all too human, concerns, carry out their work, respond to the demands of the legal process, and emerge from the experience stronger and more self-assured professionals? To master this serious life stressor and maintain their integrity and equilibrium, physicians need to explore what the event means to them personally, recognize the emotions it generates, understand the reasons for these emotions so that they can distinguish what they can and cannot control, correct any distortions related to the event, and make changes that help them emerge as a confident and healthier person.

Keywords

Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Medical Malpractice Tort System Civil Litigation Malpractice Suit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Medical Association. Medical Liability Reform—Now! July 19, 2006. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/go/mlrnow. Accessed September 26, 2007.
  2. 2.
    Miller D. Liability for Medical Malpractice: Issues and Evidence. A Joint Economic Committee Study. Jim Saxton, Vice Chairman. United States Congress, May 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilbert SM. Wrongful death: a memoir. New York. W.W. Norton, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hilfiker D. Healing the Wounds: A Physician Looks at his Work. New York: Pantheon Books; 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C harles SC, Kennedy EC. Defendant: A Psychiatrist on Trial for Medical Malpractice. New York: Vintage Books; 1986.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerard J. Callers besiege CBS over Andy Rooney. New York Times, February 10, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984:22-25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C harles SC, Frisch PF. Adverse Events, Stress and Litigation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:58, 94.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horowitz MJ. Treatment of Stress Response Syndromes. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charles SC, Frisch PF. Adverse Events, Stress and Litigation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:20, 216.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabbard GO. The role of compulsiveness in the normal physician. JAMA 1985;254:2926-2929.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berlinger N. After Harm: Medical Error and the Ethics of Forgiveness. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005:89.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kenardy JA, Carr VJ. Debriefing post disaster: Follow-up after a major earthquake. In: Raphael B, Wilson JP, eds. Psychological Debriefing: Theory, Practice and Evidence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2000:174-181.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anonymous surgeon. Physicians and Medical Malpractice Litigation. Report to the Council of Medical Specialty Societies. Chicago: Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Charles
    • 1
  1. 1.PsychiatryUniversity of Illinois School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations