Advertisement

Refractive Corneal Surgery

  • James J. Salz
  • Anne M. Menke

Few ophthalmic subspecialties generate as much public enthusiasm and criticism as refractive eye surgery: Tiger Woods’ professional success after his refractive surgery may lend a certain glamour to LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis), but websites devoted to “LASIK disasters” abound. In this chapter, a refractive surgeon with extensive research and clinical experience and a health care risk manager assess how refractive surgery has fared in the courtroom.

To provide the reader with an overview of the topic of medical malpractice and refractive surgery, we present overall ophthalmic claims experience and compare the incidence of refractive surgery claims to that of other types of eye cases (e.g., cataract surgery). Then each of the three most common refractive surgery procedures—radial keratotomy (RK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and LASIK—are analyzed from a risk management and professional liability perspective, followed by a discussion of recent cases with multimillion dollar awards that have garnered national attention. The chapter concludes with a review of pertinent literature and a discussion of how to minimize the risks of a claim.

Keywords

Pupil Size Refractive Surgery Photorefractive Keratectomy Optical Zone Refractive Corneal Surgery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ISRS/AAO Survey.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abbott, RL, Ou RR, Bird M. Medical malpractice predictors for ophthalmologists performing LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 2003;11:2137-2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Post v. University Physicians, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larson v. Weis, M.D. and N. Refractive Surgery Ctr., 21 Nat. J.V.R.A. 4:C6 (Minn. Dist. 2006).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maggie Haberman. He wins $7.25M In Botched Eye Surgery Suit. New York Daily News (July 31, 2005).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    $3 million awarded for botched LASIK eye surgery. Lawyers USA, August 14, 2006, citing Gropack v. TLC Laser Eye Centers; June 28, 2006; Nassau County Supreme Court, Mineola, N.Y.; Judge Roy Mahon.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith SE. Deciphering medical malpractice predictors. Cataract Refract Surg Today 2004;4(2):45-53.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donnenfeld ED. Surgical volume and patient care. Cataract Refract Surg Today 2004;4(2):54-56.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffman J. Study turns up the “volume.” Ophthalmol Manage 2004;Apr:146-148.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stulting RD, Carr JD, Thompson KP, et al. Complications of LASIK for the correction of myopia. Ophthalmology 1999;106:13-20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menke AM. Advertising medical services. Available at: http://www.omic.com/resources/ risk_man/forms/medical_office/AdvMedServices.rtf.
  12. 12.
    Menke AM. Review of advertisement for medical services. Available at: http://www.omic. com/resources/risk_man/forms/medical_office/AdvReviewForm.rtf.
  13. 13.
    Schallhorn SC, Kaupp SE, Tanzer DJ, et al. Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1606-1614.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pop M, Payette Y, Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 2004;111:3-10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chalita MR, Chavalia S, Xu M, et al. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology 2004;447-453.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maguen E, Schlanger J, Wong J, Salz J. Relationship between total aberrations (RMS) and pupil size in ametropic eyes with the LADAR wave system [abstr]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44E.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Randazzo A, Nizzola F, Rossetti L, et al. Pharmacologic management of night vision distur-bances after refractive surgery, results of a randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:1764-1772.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McDonald JE II, El Moatassem Kotb AM, Decker BB. Effect of brimonidine tartrate ophthal-mic solution.02% on pupil size in normal eyes under different luminance conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:560-564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Malecaze F, Coullet J, Calvas P, et al. Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia. Ophthalmology 2006;113:742-746.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Consent for comanagement after eye surgery. Available at: http://www.omic.com/resources/ risk_man/forms/patient/ComanagementConsent.rtf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. Salz
    • 1
  • Anne M. Menke
    • 2
  1. 1.OphthalmologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance CompanySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations