Advertisement

Teacher Preparation Programs

  • Kathryn M. Borman
  • Elaine Mueninghoff
  • Bridget A. Cotner
  • Phyllis Bach Frederick
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 21)

The landscape of teacher preparation must address the enormous pressures that face today's teachers. In the United States currently, teachers are under intense scrutiny while addressing the changing needs of students who are both increasingly diverse and polarized with respect to their socioeconomic status. Moreover, teachers face stringent requirements for accountability under the rubric of No Child Left Behind (US Department of Education, 2007). Furthermore, teacher preparation leader Darling-Hammond suggests the call for a national policy to facilitate schools in addressing the intellectual needs of the twenty-first century (Darling-Hammond, 2007). Students need access to quality education and teachers to prepare them for their futures. Research indicates that a knowledgeable teacher is better equipped to facilitate student learning then teachers who have not been academically prepared (Olson, 2000). To address these complexities, colleges of education are attempting to adapt their traditional models of teacher education. In addition, new alternative routes to certification of teachers are being implemented throughout the nation (Bradley, 2007). These reform efforts have had varying degrees of success.

Keywords

Teacher Education Prospective Teacher Teacher Education Program Teacher Preparation Teacher Candidate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anhorn, R. (2008, Spring). The profession that eats its young. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 74(3), 15–26.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, K., Kagan, D., Klemp, R., Roderick, S., & Takenaga, T. (1997). Toward a growth model of teacher professionalism. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.Teachersnetwork.org/TNPI/Research
  3. Berry, B., Darling-Hammond, L., Hirsch, E., Robinson, S., & Wise, A. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the “Highly Qualified” teacher: The promise and the possibilities. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.teachingqualityGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake, S. (2008, April). A nation at risk and the blind men. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(8), 601–602.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, P. (2007, January 29). The alternate route. Community College Weekly.Google Scholar
  6. Carnegie Corporation of New York (2007). Teachers for a new era — Prospectus. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.carnegie.org/cgi-bin/printpage/printit.pl
  7. Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the twenty-first century. New York: Forum.Google Scholar
  8. Charner, I. (2004, April). New directions in teacher induction: Emerging strategies from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego.Google Scholar
  9. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: The framework for professional teaching practice (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA : Association for Surpervision and Curriucular Development.Google Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998, February). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.Google Scholar
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007, May 21). Evaluating No Child Left Behind. The Nation, 11–16.Google Scholar
  12. Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002, September–October). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dean, C., Lauer, P., & Urquhart, V. (2005, December). Outstanding teacher education programs: What do they have that the others don't? Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4) 284–286.Google Scholar
  14. ECS Education Policy Issue Site: Teaching Quality. (2007). Teacher preparation/education. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.ecs.org/html/issue.asp?issueid±129&subIssueID=63
  15. Educational Testing Service. (2001). The praxis exam: State by state requirements. Princeton, NJ: Author.Google Scholar
  16. Fraser, J. W. (1992). Preparing teachers for democratic schools: The Holmes and Carnegie reports five Years later—A critical reflection. Teacher College Record, 94(1), 7–40.Google Scholar
  17. Galley, M. (2003). Many teachers missing “highly qualified” mark. Education Week, 22(43), 30–32.Google Scholar
  18. Georgia Teacher Alternative Preparation Program. (2001). Retrieved November 2007 from http://www. gapsc.com/GATAPP/home.asp
  19. Hart, P. D. Research Associates Inc. & Winston Group. (2006). Keeping our edge: Americans speak on education and competitiveness. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  20. Kysilka, M. (2003). No Child Left Behind: What does it really mean? Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 5(2), 99–104.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, A.C. (2007). Washington scene. Education Digest, 72(8), 72–75.Google Scholar
  22. National Center for Education Information. (2005). Alternative routes to teacher certification: An overview. Washington, DC. Retrieved April 2008 from http://www.ncei.com
  23. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education.Google Scholar
  24. Olson, L. (2000). Finding and keeping competent teachers. Education Week, 19(18), 12–18.Google Scholar
  25. Patterson, C., & Purkey, W. (1993). The preparation of humanistic teachers for next century schools. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 31(4), 147–155.Google Scholar
  26. Ponticell, J. A. (2007). Teachers. In K. M. Borman, S. E. Cahill, & B. A. Cotner (Eds.), The Praeger handbook of American high schools. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Promising Practices: New Ways to Improve Teacher Quality. (1998). Improving teacher preparation. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/PromPractice/chapter3.html
  28. Reauthorization of Higher Education Act. (1998). Retrieved May 2008 from http://www.ed.gpv/offices/ OPE/PPI/Reauthor/tch1016.html
  29. Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.Google Scholar
  30. Sadker, D. M., Sadker, M. P., & Zittleman, K. R. (2008). Teachers, schools, and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Seed, A. H. (2008). Redirecting the teaching profession in the wake of a nation at risk and NCLB. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(8), 586–589.Google Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. S. (1998). Theory, practice and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Teacher education does not exist. Stanford Educator, (Fall), 7.Google Scholar
  34. Shulman, L. S. (2006). More than competition. Chronicle of Education Higher, 53(2), 104.Google Scholar
  35. Shulman, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, E. (2008). Raising standards in American schools? Problems with improving teacher quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 610–622.Google Scholar
  37. Thattai, D. (2001). A history of public education in the United States. Retrieved April 2008 from http:// www.servinfree.net
  38. The Carnegie Report (1980). Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education, Three Thousand Futures: The Next 20 Years in Higher Education. New York: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. The Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes group. East Lansing, MI: Author.Google Scholar
  40. US Department of Education. (2004). Innovations in education. Alternative routes to teacher certification. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/tchrqual/recruit/altroutes/report_pg12.html
  41. US Department of Education. (2007). No Child Left Behind: A guide for policymakers. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/nclb

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn M. Borman
    • 1
  • Elaine Mueninghoff
    • 2
  • Bridget A. Cotner
    • 1
  • Phyllis Bach Frederick
    • 2
  1. 1.Alliance for Applied Research in Education and Anthropology, Department of AnthropologyUniversity of South FloridaTampa
  2. 2.University of Cincinnati, Department of Education, Clermont CollegeUniversity of CincinnatiBatavia

Personalised recommendations