Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 21))

The teaching of science in schools in most countries changed markedly during the last four decades of the twentieth century. The first 60 years of that century gave rise to many remarkable advances in science, not only with respect to basic scientific principles, but also in the applications of science to technology for military purposes and the growth and development of living organisms. This led to major changes in an understanding of scientific processes, the rejection of positivism and greater recognition of the contribution of science to economic and technological development. Consequently, in the late 1950s it was widely recognized that the teaching of science in schools must also change. The major changes that occurred were: (a) the teaching of biology in schools with an ecological focus to replace the teaching of botany, zoology and physiology largely to girls, (b) the teaching of science related to the earth, the solar system, the universe and the environment, (c) the teaching of an integrated science during the early years of secondary schooling, rather than the teaching of only physics and chemistry as the basic sciences, (d) the teaching of elementary science during the primary school years, replacing the study of nature, and (e) a greater emphasis on inquiry and investigation in the learning of science. Unfortunately, the applications of science both in everyday life, in technology and in conservation of the environment were often overlooked in the new courses that were introduced. However, after 20 years of intense activity world-wide, the movement for change in the teaching of science lost momentum in many countries of the Western world. This was at a time when the developing countries were searching for leadership and for advances in the teaching of science to support their economic and technological development that involved the uses and applications of scientific knowledge and the processes involved in scientific inquiry.

At the beginning of the twenty-first century the teaching of science can be said to be in a state of crisis. This situation has arisen from a growing shortage of science teachers in the physical sciences and mathematics, that has resulted both from the retirement of teachers who were educated during the peak years of reform in science teaching and who were attracted to the teaching profession, as well as from the higher financial rewards that were available in the fields of technology and commerce which had become oriented to science-based development. Furthermore, today the teaching and learning of science is too often seen as a field that involves only what takes place in a classroom and is thus divorced from a world that is changing rapidly as a consequence of continuing growth and development in the fields of science and technology. The authors adopt the view that it is both incomplete and inadequate to consider the learning of science as involving only those practices associated with the teaching of science in classrooms and laboratories. The media, the internet, peer group activities, investigation centres, field displays and museums all have a central role in the teaching and learning of science by children and by adults throughout their lives, because the fields of science are advancing at a rapid rate. The learning of science in schools is critical for all that follows outside the classroom and at later stages of life and that is related to scientific and technological development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikin, W. M. (1942). Adventures in American education: Vol. 1. Story of the eight year study. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, H. E. (1903). The teaching of scientific method. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equality: Cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. In Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Hastings, T. J., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortoft, H. (1996). The wholeness of nature. New York: Lindisfarne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. (1952). The history of western education. London: Adam and Charles Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 499–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Campeone, J. C., Metz, K. E., & Ash, D. B. (1997). The development of science learning abilities in children. In K. Härnqvist & A. Burgen (Eds.), Growing up with Science. London: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., & De Boer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357–387). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, L. C., & Keeves, J. P. (1973). Science education in nineteen countries: An empirical study. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, W. F. (1980). The history of education in the twentieth century world. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, S. J., & Boultwood, M. E. A. (1964). A short history of educational ideas. London: University Tutorial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design-Based Research Collection. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, H. T. (1978). Growth spurts during brain development: Implications for educational theory and practice. In J. S. Chall & A. F. Masky (Eds.), Education and the brain. NSSE 27th Yearbook, Part 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton, NJ.: Van Nostrand.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M. (1963). The learning requirements for enquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M. (1965). Psychological issues in Science a Process Approach. In The psychological basis of science — A process approach (AAAS Miscellaneous Publications, pp. 63–68). Washington, DC: Commission on Science Education, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. A. (2004). On reflection. Studies in Comparative and International Education No. 11. Adelaide, Australia: Shannon Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1988). Hierarchical models in the structure of cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1994). Models of Intelligence. In T. Husén, T. N. Postlethwaite, B. R. Clark, & G. Neave (Eds.), Education: The complete encyclopedia (CD-ROM). Oxford: Pergamon (Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Post metaphysical thinking. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(3), 1184–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Wössman, L. (2007). Education quality and economic growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. M. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (1985). History of science education. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 4453–4456). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R. D. (1969). Introductory physics: A model approach. New York: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R. D., & Thier, H. D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J. P., Njora, H., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2003). Monitoring the impact of globalization on education and human development. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 1331–1346). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S Bloom, J. T. Hastings, & G. F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning (pp. 559–642). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E., & Cooley, W. W. (1963). Test of understanding science. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E., & Cooley, W. W. (1964). The history of science cases. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N. (1943). On problems connected with item selection and test construction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 61, 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokan, J., Hollingsworth, H., & Hackling, M. (2006). Teaching science in Australia. Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N., & Keeves, J. P. (1999). Advances in educational research and assessment. Oxford: Per-gamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, W. S., DeVoss, J. C., & Kelly, F. J. (1924). Educational tests and measurements. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netz, R., & Noel, W. (2007). The Archimedes codex. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal-Leone, J. (1976). A view of cognition from a formalistic perspective. In K. F. Rugel & J. A. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world (Vol. 1, pp. 89–110). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (2000). Constructivism in education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child's construction of quantities. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1976). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • PISA (Programme for International Scientific Assessment). (2003). Scientific literacy. Paris: OECD (CERI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of belief. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute of Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosier, M. J., & Keeves, J. P. (Eds.). (1991). The IEA study of science I: Science education and curricula in twenty-three countries. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, F. J., Holton, G., & Watson, F. G. (1970). The project physics course: Text. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer, M., & Adey, P. (1981). Towards a science of science teaching. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer, M., & Adey, P. (2002). Learning intelligence: Cognitive acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 Years. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shymansky, J. A., Hedges, L. V., & Woodworth, G. (1990). A reassessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curricula of the 60s on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1964). The two cultures. A second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearritt, D. (Ed.). (1982). The improvement of measurement in education and psychology. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied psychometrics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1994). Evaluation: A Tylerian perspective. In T. Husén, T. N. Postlethwaite, B. R. Clark, & G. Neave (Eds.), Education: The complete encyclopedia (CD-ROM). Oxford: Pergamon (Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praagh, G. (Ed.). (1973). H. E. Armstrong and science education. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1997). On the development of the understanding of abstract ideas. In K. Härnqvist & A. Burgen (Eds.), Growing up with science (pp. 41–58). London: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westaway, F. W. (1929). Science teaching. London: Blackie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S., & Kissane, B. (1995). Outcome-based education: A review of the literature. Perth, Australia: Education Department of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keeves, J.P., Darmawan, I.G.N. (2009). Teaching Science. In: Saha, L.J., Dworkin, A.G. (eds) International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 21. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73317-3_65

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics