Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 21))

Education has traditionally institutionalized the dominant social and economic role of men in society, and the early history of teaching in schools and universities in the English speaking world is largely one of preparing ‘gentlemen’ for positions of leadership. However, there is now a concern in many education systems that boys are not succeeding in school as much as they should. This has led to a concerted focus in education policy and debate on boys' achievement in school, with numerous research studies and government inquiries seeking to understand this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barker, B. (1997). Girls' world or anxious times: What's really happening at school in the gender war? Educational Review, 49, 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, B., Tymms, P., & Merrell, C. (2008). Role models, school improvement and the ‘gender gap’ — Do men bring out the best in boys and women the best in girls? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2007). Undertanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1996). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender strategies for schools. Teachers' College Record, 98(2), 206–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, P. (2004). Boys and schooling in the early years. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 528–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2007). Gender and education: The evidence on pupils in England. Nottingham, UK: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deslandes, R., & Cloutier, R. (2002). Adolescents' perception of parental involvement in schooling. School Psychology International, 23(2), 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, D., & Vogt Yuan, A. (2005). Sex differences in school performance during high school: Puzzling patterns and possible explanations. The Sociological Quaterly, 46, 299–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. (2000). Boys, girls and achievement: Addressing the classroom issues. London: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. (2006). Heroes or zeroes? The construction of the boys' achievement debate within neo-liberal policy discourse. Journal of Education Policy, 21, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., & Skelton, C. (2005). Reassessing gender and achievement: Questioning contemporary key debates. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frater, G. (2000). Securing boys' literacy: A survey of effective practice in primary schools. London: Basic Skills Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50(2), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R., & Gilbert, P. (1998). Masculinity goes to school. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. (2003). Reaching out to fathers: An examination of staff efforts that lead to greater father involvement in early childhood programming. College Station, TX: Early Childhood Research and Practice Center, The Texas A and M University System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Monte, P., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender and math. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurian, M. (2001). Boys and girls learn differently! San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S., Wallace, G., & Rudduck, J. (1993). “It's not just that I haven't learnt much. It's just that I don't understand what I'm doing”: Metacognition and secondary school students. Research Papers in Edu cation: Policy and Practice, 10, 254–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R. (2004). Young people and mentoring: Towards a national strategy — A report prepared for Big Brothers Big Sisters Australia. Sydney: Dusseldorp Skills Forum and The Smith Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C., Sipe, C., & McClanahan, J. (with Arbreton, A., & Pepper, S.). (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship development in community-based and school-based programs. Philadelphia: Public Private Partnerships.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Training. (2002). Boys' education: Getting it right. Canberra, Commonwealth Government of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (2002). ‘Laddishness’ as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (2003). Motives for ‘laddishness’ at school: Fear of ‘feminine.’ British Educational Research Journal, 29, 583–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, D., Jurich, S., & Estes, S. (2001). Raising minority academic achievement: A compendium of edu cation programs and practices. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekielek, S., Moore, K., & Hair, E. (2002). Mentoring programs and youth development: A synthesis. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (2000). “What about the boys?” What the current debates tell us, and don't tell us, about boys in school. Wellesley Centers for Women Research Report, 21(2), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesko, N. (Ed.). (2000). Masculinities at school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, G., & Muijs, D. (2006). Challenging underachievement in boys. Educational Research, 48(3): 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2003). Where to in gender policy in education after recuperative masculinity politics? Inter national Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Mills, M., & Bahr, M. (2002). Addressing the educational needs of boys. Can berra: Australian Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malacova, E. (2007). Effect of single-sex education on progress in GCSE. Oxford Review of Education, 33(2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., & Meyenn, B. (Eds.). (2001). What about the boys? Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., & Meyenn, B. (2002), War, guns and cool, tough things: Interrogating single-sex classes as a strategy for engaging boys in English, Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J., & Beltman, S. (2002). Role models for young people: What makes an effective role model program? Hobart: National Youth Affairs Research Scheme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. (2003). Shaping the boys' agenda: The backlash blockbusters. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munns, G., Arthur, L., Downes, T., Gregson, R., Power, A., Sawyer, W., et al. (2006). Motivation and engagement of eoys: Evidence-based teaching practices. Canberra: Australian Government Depart ment of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Education Review Office. (2000). Promoting boys' achievement. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from Education Evaluation Report, Education Review Office, Government of New Zealand Web site: http://www.ero.govt.nz/ero/publishing.nsf/Content/5304557C4C73DA95CC25704A00132E6B?

  • Ofsted. (2000). Improving city schools. London: Office for Standards in Education, UK Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2003a). Boys' achievement in secondary schools. London: Office for Standards in Education, UK Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2003b). Yes he can. Schools where boys write well. London: Office for Standards in Education, United Kingdom Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paechter, C. (2007). Being boys, being girls: Learning masculinities and femininities. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, K., & Hendry, L. (1996). Young people and mentoring: Towards a typology? Journal of Adoles cence, 19(3), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quebec Ministry of Education. (2004). Boys' academic achievement: Putting the findings into perspec tive. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from Government of Quebec Web site: http://www.meq.gouv. qc.ca/stat/recherche/Reussite_garcons_ang.pdf

  • Slade, M., & Trent, F. (2000). What the boys are saying: An examination of the views of boys about declin ing rates of achievement and retention. International Education Journal, 1(3), 201–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (2003). Failing boys and moral panics: Perspectives on the underachievement debate. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(3), 282–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, L., Katz, H., Chaszewski, L., & Wojcik, C. (2007). Good-bye, Mr. Chips: Male teacher shortages and boys' reading achievement. Sex Roles, 56(9), 651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielhofer, T., O'Donnell, L., Benton, T., & Schagen, I. (2002). The impact of school size and single-sex education on performance (LEA Report 33). Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhnandan, L., Lee, B., & Kelleher, S. (2000). An investigation into gender differences in achievement: Phase 2 — School and classroom strategies. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J. (2004). Boy trouble: Rhetorical framing of boys' underachievement. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(2), 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73, 471–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. (2006, Fall). “Brain-based” learning: More fiction than fact. Retrieved January 20, 2008, from American Educator Web site: http://www.aft.org/pubsreports/american_educator/issues/ fall2006/cogsci.htm

  • Woodward, L.J., Fergusson, D.M., & Horwood, L.J. (1999), Effects of single-sex and coeducational second ary schooling on children's academic achievement Australian Journal of Education 43(2), 142–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (2002). Single-sex teaching in a co-educational comprehensive school in England: An evaluation based upon students' performance and classroom interactions. British Educa tional Research Journal, 28, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (2007). Closing the gender gap? Issues of gender equity in English secondary schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(2), 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, M., Warrington, M., & Williams, J. (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality and rhetoric? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, M., Warrington, M., Gray, J., Rudduck, J., McLellan, R., Bearne, E. et al. (2005). Raising boys' achievement (Research Report No. 636). Nottingham, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilbert, R. (2009). Teaching and the Boy Problem. In: Saha, L.J., Dworkin, A.G. (eds) International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 21. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73317-3_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics