Teaching at Tertiary Level

  • Linda Hort
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 21)

Teaching at higher education level is about the discipline.

I mean this in two senses. It is about the academic discipline, the field of study which underpins the content that creates the basis for the teaching. Picking up on this meaning, recently, teaching within universities has been described by some higher education writers as ‘research-led’ (Jenkins et al., 2003). The importance of such a description of their teaching for those who teach in higher education is that students are being taught about being ‘historians’ or ‘biologists’. Academic disciplines have been described as ‘territories’ guarded by ‘tribes’ (Becher & Trowler, 2001). More recent work on academic ‘practice’ has identified practices and ‘arrangements’ which are characteristic of particular disciplinary points of view (Beckett & Hagar, 2002). What this describes for teaching at tertiary level is a certain set of academic cultures with a specific set of customs and practices. This results in a set of norms, or a set of particular approaches to ‘ways of knowing’ in different disciplinary settings (see, e.g., Lea & Street, 1998). These disciplinary differences impact the teacher and the learner in ways that are not found in teaching at other levels.


High Education Tertiary Teaching Academic Discipline Academic Staff Tertiary Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlind, G. (2003). Growing and developing as an academic. Australia: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., Arthur, R., & Stokes T. (1997). Qualifications of Australian academics. Evaluations and Investigation Program, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D., Johnson, R., & Saha L. (2002). Changes in academic work: Implications for universities of the changing age distribution and work roles of academic staff. Australian Government Department of Science, Education and Training, higher_education/publications_resources/higher_education_publications_AtoZ.htm?wbc_ purpose=basic%23%23%23?wbc_purpose=basic%23%23%23
  4. Anderson, D., & Saha L. (forthcoming). Academics on the ropes: The demise of a profession.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. Britain: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barrie, S., Clegg, K., Coe, T., Harper, M., & Kiley, M. (2006). Illuminating pathways to leadership. In L. Elvidge (Ed.), Exploring good leadership and management practice in higher education: Issues of engagement (pp. 93–110). Cambridge: Jill Rogers.Google Scholar
  7. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning: Practice in postmodernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Beiber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). “Conceptualising the academic life: Graduate students' perspectives.” The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1009–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boud, D. (1988). Developing student autonomy in learning. New York: Nicholls Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  11. Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  12. Brew, A. (2001). Thenature of research. London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, A., et al. (2003). Reshaping teaching in higher education: Linking teaching and research. London & Sterling,VA: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  14. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marsh, H., & Hattie, J. (2002, September/October). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Hort
    • 1
  1. 1.CEDAMThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations