Advertisement

Teaching and Nonverbal Behavior in the Classroom

  • Elisha Babad
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 21)

What do teachers need to know about nonverbal (NV) behavior and how can they make use of this knowledge in their classrooms? These are the questions guiding this chapter. Central topics and issues in the psychology of nonverbal communication are presented first, followed by a discussion of NV behavior in teacher—student interac tion in the classroom. The latter presentation is divided in two parts — one discussing students' NV behavior (with teachers as detectors), the other focusing on teachers' NV behavior (with students as detectors). The discussion of teachers' NV behavior further distinguishes between “positive” and “negative” phenomena in terms of their effects on students.

Keywords

Nonverbal Behavior Nonverbal Communication Thin Slice Classroom Management Classroom Climate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambady, N., Bernieri F., & Richeson, J. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from this slices of the behavioral stream. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babad, E. (1992). Teacher expectancies and nonverbal behavior. In R. S. Feldman (Ed.), Applications of nonverbal theories and research (pp. 167–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Babad, E. (1993). Teachers' differential behavior. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babad, E. (1995). The “teacher's pet” phenomenon, teachers' differential behavior, and students' morale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babad, E. (1998). Preferential affect: The crux of the teacher expectancy issue. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 7. Expectations in the classroom (pp. 183–214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Babad, E. (2005a). Nonverbal behavior in education. In J. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal, & K. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 283–311). Oxford: Oxford Uni versity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Babad, E. (2005b). Guessing teachers' differential treatment of high- and low-achievers from thin slices of their public lecturing behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Babad, E. (2005c). The psychological price of media bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Babad, E. (2007). Teachers' nonverbal behavior and its effects on students. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 201–261). Holland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Teachers' brief nonverbal behaviors can predict certain aspects of students' evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 553–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2004). Prediction of students' evaluations from brief instances of professors' nonverbal behavior in defined instructional situations. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Babad, E., Bernieri, F., & Rosenthal, R. (1989a). Nonverbal communication and leakage in the behavior of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Babad, E., Bernieri, F., & Rosenthal, R. (1989b). When less information is more informative: Diagnosing teacher expectancies from brief samples of behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 281–195.Google Scholar
  15. Brophy, J. (1985). Teacher-student interaction. In J. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 303–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. DePaulo, B. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DePaulo, B. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DePaulo, B., & Friedman, H. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 3–40). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. DePaulo, B., Lindsay, J., Malone, B., Muhlenbruck, L., & Cooper, H. (2003). Clues to deception. Psycho logical Bulletin, 129, 74–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekman, P. (1985/2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Ekman, P. (1989). Why kids lie? New York: Charles Scribners.Google Scholar
  22. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1969a). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usages and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.Google Scholar
  23. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1969b). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry 32, 88–106.Google Scholar
  24. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1978). Facial Action Coding System: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
  25. Frank, M. (2005). Research methods in detecting deception research. In J. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal, & K. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 341–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, M, & Rosenthal, R. (2005). No more teachers' dirty looks: Effects of teacher nonverbal behavior on student outcomes. In R. E. Riggio & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Applications of nonverbal communica tion (pp. 157–192). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. McCroskey, P., & Richmond, J. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. Richmond & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control and concern (pp. 101–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Murray, H. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. (1979). Sex differences in eavesdropping of nonverbal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  32. Weinstein, R. (2002). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Witt, P., Wheeless, L., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood, A. (1999). The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student motivation, selective attention, and text memory (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts Interna tional, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 59 (9-A), 3355.Google Scholar
  35. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B., & Rosenthal, R. (1986). Humans as deceivers and lie detectors. In P. Blanck, R. Buck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Nonverbal communication in the clinical context (pp. 13–35). Univer sity Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisha Babad
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationHebrew University of JerusalemMt. ScopusIsrael

Personalised recommendations