Advertisement

Principal and Teachers Relations: Trust at the Core of School Improvement

  • Pamela R. Hallam
  • Charles Hausman
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 21)

Educational leaders and teachers face constant internal and external pressure to reform their practice to ensure that every student meets high standards. In many countries, including the United States, the last two decades have been characterized by large-scale reforms of public education systems (Fullan, 2001; Seashore-Louis, Toole, & Hargreaves, 1999; Young & Levin, 1999). According to Cranston (2007), “these reforms are due to powerful political, social, and economic shifts in the environment in which schools are nested; advances in our understanding of learning, organization and management of schools; and shifts in the expected relations between schools and clients” (p. 1). Consequently, new conceptualizations for the profession of educational leaders and teachers need to be developed (Murphy, 2002).

In light of such fundamental shifts in the landscape of schooling, many researchers contend that the relationships between stakeholders are pivotal to the success or failure of school reform (Bryk & Schneider, 2002). Clearly, in this era of accountability and the pressures that accompany it, there is a premium placed on the interpersonal skills of school leaders. This chapter focuses on one key element that is central to productive relationships between principals and teachers. Specifically, this chapter explores how trust can facilitate school leaders, working in tandem with teachers, to use the current accountability mandates to focus their efforts in professional learning communities to improve organizational practices and student outcomes.

Keywords

School Reform School Improvement Educational Leader Relational Trust Professional Learning Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict and community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104, 421–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. (1973). On organizations of the future. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2001). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing service over self-interest. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  5. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (1996, August). Social trust: A moral resource for school improvement. Paper presented at the 1996 annual meeting of the American Sociological Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 81–105.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 9(Suppl.), S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cranston, J., (2007). Holding the reins of the professional learning community: Principals' perceptions of the normative imperative to develop schools as professional learning communities. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Manitoba. Accessed on March 22, 2007, at http://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/ bitstream/1993/2757/1/JeromeCranstonThesisFinal_v2.pdf
  10. Crow, G. M., Hausman, C. S., & Scribner, J. P. (2002). Reshaping the role of the school principal. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 189–210). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DuFour, R. (2001). The learning-centered principal. Educational Leadership, 59(9), 12–15.Google Scholar
  14. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work. Best practices for enhancing student learning. New York: National Educational Services.Google Scholar
  15. Elmore, R. F., (2001) Knowing the right thing to do: School improvement and performace-based accountability. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Accessed on January 21, 2008, at http://www.nga.org/cda/files/0803KNOWING.PDFGoogle Scholar
  16. Fairholm, G. W. (1994). Leadership and the culture of trust. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Forsyth, P. B., Barnes, L. B., & Adams, C. M. (2006). Trust-effectiveness: Patterns in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(2), 122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (2004). The adaptive school: Developing and facilitating collaborative groups. El Dorado Hills, CA: Four Hats Seminars.Google Scholar
  21. Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Govier, T. (1992). Distrust as a practical problem. Journal of Philosophy, 23(1), 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoy, W. K., & Kupersmith, W. J. (1985). The meaning and measure of faculty trust. Educational and Psychological Research, 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
  27. Hoy, W. K., & Kupersmith, W. J. (1984). Principal authenticity and faculty trust. Planning and Changing (pp. 81–88).Google Scholar
  28. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Witkoskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1), 38–45.Google Scholar
  30. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9(3), 184–208.Google Scholar
  31. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools. In W. K. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 181–207). Greenwich, CT: Information.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, L. W. (1974). Achieving effective human relations and morale. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  33. Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. (1997). Properties of trust: An analytical view. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(1), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kochanek, J. R. (2005). Building trust for better schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kouzes, J. M. & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Leithwood, L., Seashore-Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www. centerforcsri.org/files/SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewicki, R. J., & Sheppard, B. (Ed.). (1998). Research in negotiations (5th ed.). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  38. Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Louis, K. S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning and trust. Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://pdfs.scarecroweducation.comGoogle Scholar
  40. Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8(15), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattessich, P. W. & Monsey, B. R. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom: The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 245–275.Google Scholar
  42. McGowan, T. M. (1990). Collaboration: Building common agendas. In H. S. Schwartz (Ed.), Collaboration: Building common agendas, clearinghouse on teacher education (pp. 41–46). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  43. McGregor, D. (1967). The professional manager. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Mizell, H. (2003). NCLB: Conspiracy, compliance, or creativity? Remarks made to the spring conference of the Maryland Council of Staff Developers on April 25, 2003. Columbia, MD. Retrieved September 8, 2006, from http://www.middleweb.com/HMnclb.html
  45. Morrissey, M. S. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Austin, TX. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.sedl.org/ pubs/change45/plc-ongoing.pdf#search = %22professional%20learning%20community
  46. Murphy, J. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 65–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Murphy, J., & Louis, K. (1994). Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  48. Nanus, B. (1989). The leader's edge: The seven keys to leadership in a turbulent world. Chicago: Contemporary Books.Google Scholar
  49. Newbury House Dictionary. (2003). Monroe Allen Publishers, Inc. Accessed January 21, 2008, from http://nhd.heinle.com/Definition.aspx?word = fulcrum
  50. Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  51. Seashore-Louis, K. S., Toole, J., & Hargreaves, A. (1999). Rethinking school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 251–276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Shea, G. F. (1984). Trust in the balance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Smylie, M., & Hart, A. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 421–443). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  54. Sonneberg, F. (1994). Trust me … trust me not. Journal of Business Strategy, 15(1), 14–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  56. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., et al. (2006). Setting professional learning communities in an international context. National College for School Leadership. Nottingham: NGB. Accessed on December 19, 2006, at http://networkedlearning.ncsl.org.uk/knowl-edge-base/programme-leaflets/professional-learning-communities/professional-learning-communi-ties-06-booklet3.pdf
  57. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.Google Scholar
  58. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tyler, T. Kramer, R. M. (1996). Whither trust? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Whitener, W. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wikipedia Encyclopedia (2008). Accessed on January 10, 2008 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Account-ability
  62. Young J., & Levin, B. (1999, January). The origins of educational reform: A comparative perspective. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 12 Google Scholar
  63. Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zand, D. E. (1997). The leadership triad: Knowledge, trust, and power. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zucker, L. G. (1986). The production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure 1840–1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 55–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela R. Hallam
    • 1
  • Charles Hausman
    • 2
  1. 1.Educational Leadership and Foundations 306 MCKBBrigham Young UniversityProvo84602
  2. 2.Educational Leadership StudiesUniversity of KentuckyLexington

Personalised recommendations