Advertisement

System, Agency, and Stakeholder Collaboration to Advance Mental Health Programs in Schools

  • Nancy A. Lever
  • Steve Adelsheim
  • Christine A. Prodente
  • Kristin V. Christodulu
  • Melissa G. Ambrose
  • John Schlitt
  • Mark D. Weist
Part of the Issues in Clinical Child Psychology book series (ICCP)

The U.S. Surgeon General's report on mental health underscores that prevention and treatment are both needed to help reduce social, emotional, and behavioral problems in children and adolescents (U.S. DePartment of Health and Human Services, 1999). The report also emphasizes that schools are a‘major‘ setting for identifying mental health concerns in youth. Schools are one of the most universal, natural settings and provide unparalleled access to youth (Weist, 1997). In fact, it is estimated that one-fourth of the U.S. population can be found in schools {Jamieson, Curry, & Martinez, 2001)

Considering the extensive mental health needs of today's youth, it is not surprising that any single agency or organization would have difficulty meeting the rising demand for services. There is growing acceptance that collaboration among school and community health, primary care, mental health, and education is crucial for effectively delivering services to youth and their families (Dryfoos, 1994- Flaherty et al., 1998). As reflected in other chapters in this book, expanded school mental health (esmh) programs are built around these school—community Partnerships (Weist, 1997). By blending the Partners' skills and resources, students and families are afforded a richer array of mental health services (Acosta, Tashman, Prodente, & Proescher, 2002). However, collaboration among people of different backgrounds and disciplines and between agencies and programs from throughout the community and state is by no means easy. In this chapter we provide background to and ideas and examples of effective school—community—state collaboration to advance mental health in schools

Throughout the chapter, we use the term stakeholder to refer to individuals, agencies, and groups who have some stake or investment in the development, implementation, and evaluation of a given endeavor. For expanded school mental health, key stakeholders include the following groups: youth, parents or guardians, teachers, administrators, school and community mental health and health staff, local and state government officials, staff from other child-serving agencies, community leaders, faith leaders, businesses, civic organizations, funders, and advocates (Kretzmann & McKnight,1993;Nabors et al., 1998; Waxman,Weist, & Benson, 1999)

There is some literature emphasizing the need to work with diverse stakeholders and multiple community and state organizations to develop or improve child and adolescent mental health programs (U.S. DePartment of Health and Human Services, 1999; Nabors, Weist, Holden, et al., 1999; Weist, 1997). However, examples of and explicit guidance for this work are lacking. Within this chapter, the definition of, barriers to, and components of successful collaboration at multiple levels will be explored. Specific use of these collaborative strategies in developing and improving expanded school mental health programs will then be addressed. The chapter concludes with two examples—one focusing on state-level collaboration to advance school mental health in New Mexico and a second focusing on the experiences of a program in Baltimore in its efforts to connect with diverse stakeholders to enhance resources and to improve quality

Keywords

Mental Health Adolescent Mental Health Mental Health Program Mental Health Concern School Mental Health 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Acosta, O. M., Tashman. N. A., Prodente, C., & Proescher, E, (2002). Implementing successful school mental health programs: Guideline and recommendations. In H. Ghuman, M. Weist,&R. Sarles (Eds.), Providing mental health services to youth where they are: School and other community-based approaches(pp. 57–74). New York; Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Acosta, O. M., Weist, M. D., Lopez, F. A., Shafer, M. E., & Pizarro, L. J. (in press), Assessing the mental health and academic needs of Latino youth, Behavior Modification Google Scholar
  3. Adelman, H. S., Taylor, L., Weist, M. D., Adelsheim, S,t Freeman, B., Kapp, L., Lahti, M., & Mawn, D, (1999). Mental health in schools: A federal initiative. Children Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice, 2, 99–119.Google Scholar
  4. Adelsheim, S. (2000). Addressing barriers to development and learning: School, family, community, and agency partnerships in New Mexico. Counseling and Human Development, 32, 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. Adelsheim, S., Carrillo, C, & Coletta, E. (2001). Developing school health in a rural state: The New Mexico school mental health initiative. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 10(1), 151–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Annie E. Casey Foundation (2001). Kids count data book, Baltimore, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Brandon, P. R., ' Wang, Z. (1994). Teacher involvement in school-conducted needs assessments. Evaluation Review, 18[4), 458–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner, C. (1991). Thinking collaboratively: Ten questions and answers to help policy makers improve children's services.Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium.Google Scholar
  9. Christenson, S. L., & Conoley, J. C. (1992). Home-school collaboration:Enhancing children's academic and social competence. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  10. Dryfoos, J. G. (1994). Full service schools. San Francisco: Jossey—Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Dryfoos, J. G., Brindis, C, & Kaplan, D. W. (1996). Research and evaluation in school-based health care. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 7(2), 207–220.Google Scholar
  12. Dwyer, K. P., & Bernstein, R. (1998). Mental health in the schools: ‘Linking islands of hope in a sea of despair.’ School Psychology Review, 27(2), 277–287.Google Scholar
  13. Flaherty, L., Garrison, E., Waxman, R., Uris, P., Keys, S., Glass-Siegel, M., & Weist, M. (1998). Optimizing the roles of school mental health professionals. Journal of School Health, 65(10), 420–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flaherty, L., & Weist, M. D. (1999). School-based mental health services: The Baltimore models. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1990). Collaboration as a predictor for success in school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner, S. (1989). Failure by fragmentation. California Tomorrow, Fall, 20–21.Google Scholar
  17. Golden, O. (1991). Collaboration as a means, not an end: Serving disadvantaged families and children. In L. B. Schorr, D. Both, et al. (Eds.), Effective services for young children: Report of a workshop(pp. 84–101). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Goldman, H., & Intriligator, B. A. (1990). Factors that enhance collaboration among education, health, and social service agencies. Paper presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  19. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparity problems. San Francisco: Jossey—Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Haynes, N. M., & Comer, J. P. (1996). Integrating schools, families, and communities through successful school reform: The school development program. School Psychology Review,.25(4), 501–506.Google Scholar
  21. Henderson, A. T., Marburger, C. L., & Ooms, T. (1986). Beyond the bake sale: An educator's guide to working with parents. Columbia, MD: The National Committee for Citizens in Education.Google Scholar
  22. Hendrickson, J. M., & Omer, D. (1995). School-based comprehensive services: An example of interagency collaboration. In P. Adams & K. Nelson (Eds.), Reinventing human services: Community-and family-centered practice(pp. 145–162). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Himmelman, A. T. (1993, July). Helping each other help others: Principles and practices of collaboration. ARCH Factsheet Number 25. Washington, DC: ARCH.Google Scholar
  24. Hodges, S., Nesman, T, & Hernandez, M. (1999). Promising practices: Building collaboration in systems of care. Systems of care: Promising practices in children's mental health, 1998 series, Volume VI. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
  25. Jamieson, A., Curry, A., & Martinez, G. (2001). School enrollment in the United States—Social and economic characteristics of students. Current population reports. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  26. Knoff, H. M. (1996). The interface of school, community, and health care reform: Organizational directions toward effective services for children and youth. School Psychology Review, 25(4), 446–464.Google Scholar
  27. Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets. Chicago: ACTA Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Lippitt, R., & Van Til, J. (1981). Can we achieve a collaborative community? Issues, imperatives, potentials. Journal of Voluntary Action Research,10(3–4), 7–17.Google Scholar
  29. Macbeth, G. (1993). Collaboration can be elusive: Virginia's experience in developing an interagency system of care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 20, 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Magrab, P. R., Young, T., & Waddell, A. (1985). Developing collaborative services for seriously emotion-ally disturbed children. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center.Google Scholar
  31. Melaville, A. I., & Blank, M. J. (1991). What it takes: Structuring interagency partnerships to connect children and families with comprehensive services. Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium.Google Scholar
  32. Nabors, L. A., & Reynolds, M. W. (2000). Program evaluation activities: Outcomes related to treatment for adolescents receiving school-based mental health services. Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 175–189.Google Scholar
  33. Nabors, L. A., Weist, M. D., Holden, E. W., & Tashman, N. A. (1999). Quality service provision in children's mental health care. Children's Services: Social Policy, Research and Practice, 2(2), 57–79.Google Scholar
  34. Nabors, L. A., Weist, M. D., &Tashman, N. A. (1999). Focus groups: A valuable tool for assessing male and female adolescent perceptions of school-based mental health services. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 4(1), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nabors, L. A., Weist, M. D., Tashman, N. A., &Myers, C. P. (1998). Quality assurance and school-based mental health services. Psychology in the Schools, 36(6), 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Assembly of National Voluntary Health and Social Welfare Organizations (1991). The community collaboration manual. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  37. National Network for Collaboration (1995). Collaboration framework—Addressing community capacity. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, USDA. Retrieved November 30, 2001, from http://www.cyfernet.org/nnco/framework.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy A. Lever
    • Steve Adelsheim
      • 1
    • Christine A. Prodente
      • 2
    • Kristin V. Christodulu
      • 3
    • Melissa G. Ambrose
      • John Schlitt
        • 4
      • Mark D. Weist
        1. 1.New Mexico DePartment of HealthSanta Fe
        2. 2.Partial Hospitalization ProgramMedical College of Ohio, Kobacker CenterToledo
        3. 3.State University of New YorkAlbany, Albany
        4. 4.National Assembly on School-Based Health CareWashington20001

        Personalised recommendations