Advertisement

Complications of Facelifting Procedures

  • Greg S. Morganroth
  • Hayes B. Gladstone
  • Isaac M. Neuhaus

Abstract

Surgical facelifting procedures remain popular despite the recent introduction of laser, light source, and radiofrequency devices as facial rejuvenation alternatives. In recent years, facelift surgery has remained one of the most popular cosmetic procedures in the United States.1 Its popularity persists because of the reproducible surgical rejuvenation with many years duration and minimal risk in experienced hands. Recent innovations with shorter scars, supra-SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) dissection, the addition of liposuction as a concomitant procedure, and less undermining provide comparable surgical outcomes to traditional techniques with less risk and downtime.2, 3, 4 While other specialties have contributed novel ideas,5 cutaneous surgeons have been innovators of a number of less aggressive lifting procedures that can be performed under local anesthesia and consequently eliminate the complications associated with general anesthesia and minimize the complications associated with deep plane or composite lifts.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Ongoing innovations in less aggressive techniques will allow facelifting procedures to continue to rise in popularity as patients seek facial rejuvenation with less risk, scarring, and downtime.

Keywords

Parotid Gland Hypertrophic Scar Facial Rejuvenation Great Auricular Nerve Tumescent Anesthesia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rohrich RJ. The increasing popularity of cosmetic surgery procedures: a look at statistics in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1363–1365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker DC. Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar face lift) with lateral SMASectomy: evolution and application. Aesthetic Surg 2001;2:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Massiha H. Short-scar face lift with extended SMAS plastysma dissection and lifting and limited skin undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:663–669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tonnard PL, Verpaele A, Monstrey S, et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2074–2086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Webster RC, Smith RC, Papsidero MJ, et al. Comparison of SMAS plication with SMAS imbrication in facelifting. Laryngoscope 1982;92:901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coleman WP 3rd, Hanke CW, Orentreich N, Kurtin SB, Brody H, Bennett R. A history of dermatologic surgery in the United States. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:5–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Warmuth IP, Bader R, Scarborough D, Bisaccia E. Dermatologic surgery into the next millennium: part I. Cutis 1999;64:245–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hancox JG, Venkat AP, Coldiron B, Feldman SR, Williford PM. The safety of office-based surgery: review of recent literature from several disciplines. Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1379–1382.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chrisman BB, Field LM. Facelift surgery update: suction assisted rhytidectomy and other improvements. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1984;10:544–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Asken S. Cervicofacial rhytidectomy. In: Coleman WP, Hanke CW, Alt TH, Asken S, eds. Cosmetic surgery of the skin. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997:428–452.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fulton JE, Saylan Z, Helton P, et al. The S-lift facelift featuring the U-suture and O-suture combined with skin resurfacing. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:18–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brandy DA. A method of augmenting the cheek area through SMAS, sub SMAS and subcutaneous tissue recruitment during facelift surgery. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:265–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bisaccia E, Khan AJ, Scarborough DA. Anterior face-lift for correction of middle face aging utilizing a minimally invasive technique. Dermatol Surg 2004;30:769–776.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alster TS, Doshi SN, Hopping SB. Combination surgical lifting with ablative laser skin resurfacing of facial skin: a retrospective analysis. Dermatol Surg 2004;30:1191–1195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cook JL, Perone JB. A prospective evaluation of the incidence of complications associated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:143–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kargi E, Babuccu O, Hosnuter M, Babuccu B, Altinyazar C. Complications of minor cutaneous surgery in patients under anticoagulant treatment. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002;26:483–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borud LJ, Matarasso A, Spaccavento CM, Hanzlik RM. Factor XI deficiency: implications for management of patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1907–1913.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Akoz T, Akan M, Yildirim S. If you continue to smoke, we may have a problem: smoking’s effects on plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002;26:477–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krueger JK, Rohrich RJ. Clearing the smoke: the scientific rationale for tobacco abstention with plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1063–1073; discussion, 1074–1077.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Larrabee WF, Makielski KH, ed. Surgical anatomy of the face. New York: Raven Press; 1993:41–48.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Castro CC. Preauricular and sideburns operating procedures for a natural look in facelifts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1991;15:149–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klein JA. Tumescent technique chronicles. Local anesthesia, liposuction and beyond. Dermatol Surg 1995;21:449–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones BM, Grover R. Reducing complications in cervicofacial rhytidectomy by tumescent infiltration: a comparative trial evaluating 678 consecutive face lifts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:398–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seify H, Jones G, Bostwick J, Hester TR. Endoscopicassisted face lift: review of 200 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:234–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. The prevention of haematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg 2001;54:481–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kamer FM, Song AU. Hematoma formation in deep plane rhytidectomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:240–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sullivan CA, Masin J, Maniglia AJ, Stepnick DW. Complications of rhytidectomy in an otolaryngology training program. Laryngoscope 1999;109:198–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perkins SW, Williams JD, Macdonald K, Robinson EB. Prevention of seromas and hematomas after face-lift surgery with the use of postoperative vacuum drains. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:743–745.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pina DP. Aesthetic and safety considerations in composite rhytidectomy: a review of 145 patients over a 3-year period. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:670–678; discussion, 679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jones BM. Facelifting: an initial eight year experience. Br J Plast Surg 1995;48:203–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rees TD, Barone CM, Valauri FA, Ginsberg GD, Nolan WB 3rd. Hematomas requiring surgical evacuation following face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:1185–1190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marchac D, Sandor G. Face lifts and sprayed fibrin glue: an outcome analysis of 200 patients. Br J Plast Surg 1994;47:306–309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lawson W, Naidu RK. The male facelift. An analysis of 115 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:535–539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alt T. Facelift surgery. In: Ratz JL, ed. Dermatologic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1998:245–311.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaye BL, Kurse JC. General anesthesia for rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;60:747–751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Izquierdo R, Parry SW, Boydell CL, Almand J. The great auricular nerve revisited: pertinent anatomy for SMAS-platysma rhytidectomy. Ann Plast Surg 1991;27:44–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McKinney P, Gottlieb J. The relationship of the great auricular nerve to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system. Ann Plast Surg 1985;14:310–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McKinney P, Katrana DJ. Prevention of injury to the great auricular nerve during rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:675–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    de Chalain T, Nahai F. Amputation neuromas of the great auricular nerve after rhytidectomy. Ann Plast Surg 1995;35:297–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Daane SP, Owsley JQ. Incidence of cervical branch injury with “marginal mandibular nerve pseudo-paralysis” in patients undergoing face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:2414–2418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kamer FM, Damiani J, Churukian M. 512 rhytidectomies. A retrospective study. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:368–370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Baker DC. Complications of cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 1983;10:543–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zani R, Fadul R Jr, Da Rocha MA, Santos RA, Alves MC, Ferreira LM. Facial nerve in rhytidoplasty: anatomic study of its trajectory in the overlying skin and the most common sites of injury. Ann Plast Surg 2003;51:236–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    MacGregor MW, Greenberg RL. Rhytidectomy. In: Goldwyn RM, ed. The unfavorable result in plastic surgery. Boston: Little Brown; 1972:335–349.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sarala PK. Accessory nerve palsy: an uncommon etiology. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1982;63:445–446.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Piza-Katzer H, Balogh B, Muzika-Herczeg E, Gardetto A. Secondary end to end repair of extensive facial nerve defects: surgical technique and postoperative functional results. Head Neck 2004;9:770–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jones BM, Grover R. Avoiding hematoma in cervicofacial rhytidectomy: a personal 8-year quest. Reviewing 910 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:381–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Perkins SW, Williams JD, Macdonald K, Robinson EB. Prevention of seromas and hematomas after facelift surgery with the use of postoperative vaccum drains. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:743–745.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    LeRoy JL Jr, Rees TD, Nolan WB 3rd. Infections requiring hospital readmission following face lift surgery: incidence, treatment, and sequelae. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:533–536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Akers JO, Mascaro JR, Baker SM. Mycobacterium abscessus infection after facelift surgery: a case report. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:572–574; discussion, 574–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pennekamp A, Pfyffer GE, Wuest J, George CA, Ruef C. Mycobacterium smegmatis infection in a healthy woman following a facelift: case report and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 1997;39:80–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Knuttel R, Torabian SZ, Fung M. Hair loss after rhytidectomy. Dermatol Surg 2004;30:1041–1042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kridel RW, Liu ES. Techniques for creating inconspicuous face-lift scars: avoiding visible incisions and loss of temporal hair. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:325–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Brennan HG, Toft KM, Dunham BO, Goode RL, Koch RJ. Prevention and correction of temporal hair loss in rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:2219–2225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Eremia S, Umar SH, Li CY. Prevention of temporal alopecia following rhytidectomy: the prophylactic use of minoxidil. A study of 60 patients. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:66–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nordstrom RE, Greco M, Vitagliano T. Correction of sideburn defects after facelift operations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000;24:429–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Parkes ML, Kamer FM, Bassilios MI. Treatment of alopecia in temporal region following rhytidectomy procedures. Laryngoscope 1977;87:1011–1014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Marks JG Jr, Rainey MA. Cutaneous reactions to surgical preparations and dressings. Contact Dermatitis 1984;10:1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sood A, Taylor JS. Bacitracin: allergen of the year. Am J Contact Dermat 2003;14:3–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Morris SD, Rycroft RJ, White IR, Wakelin SH, McFadden JP. Comparative frequency of patch test reactions to topical antibiotics. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:1047–1051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Iijima S, Kuramochi M. Investigation of irritant skin reaction by 10% povidone-iodine solution after surgery. Dermatology 2002;204(Suppl 1):103–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Goon AT, White IR, Rycroft RJ, McFadden JP. Allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine. Dermatitis 2004;15:45–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Murray JC. Keloids and hypertrophic scars. Clin Dermatol 1994;12:27–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Grimes PE, Hunt SG. Considerations for cosmetic surgery in the black population. Clin Plast Surg 1993;20:27–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Roques C. Massage applied to scars. Wound Repair Regen 2002;10:126–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gold MH, Foster TD, Adair MA, Burlison K, Lewis T. Prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids by the prophylactic use of topical silicone gel sheets following a surgical procedure in an office setting. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:641–644.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    English RS, Shenefelt PD. Keloids and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Surg 1999;25:631–638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Berman B, Villa A. Imiquimod 5% cream for keloid management. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:1050–1051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick RE. Treatment response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars: comparison among intralesional corticosteroid, 5-fluorouracil, and 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser treatments. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1149–1155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pickett BP, Burgess LP, Livermore GH, Tzikas TL, Vossoughi J. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:565–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Knize DM. Periauricular facelift incisions and the auricular anchor. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1508–1520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Brink RR. Auricular displacement with rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:408–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Brink RR. Auricular displacement with rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:743–752.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Mowlavi A, Meldrum DG, Wilhelmi BJ, et al. The “pixie” ear deformity following face lift surgery revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1165–1171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Eisenberg E, Yaari A, Har-Shai Y. Chronic, burning facial pain following cosmetic facial surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:76–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Borah G, Rankin M, Wey P. Psychological complications in 281 plastic surgery practices. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1241–1246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg S. Morganroth
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hayes B. Gladstone
    • 3
  • Isaac M. Neuhaus
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Dermatology and OtolaryngologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Department of Clinical DermatologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations