Advertisement

Complications of Dermabrasion and Chemical Peeling Procedures

  • Chris Harmon
  • Betty Davis

Abstract

Complications can occur with resurfacing procedures even with proper technique and appropriate patient selection. Physicians performing these techniques have an obligation to know the risks and benefits of the procedure as well as how to treat any side effect or complications that may arise. It is also important that patients receiving these procedures understand the risks and are willing to accept a complication if one does occur.

Keywords

Allergic Contact Dermatitis Toxic Shock Syndrome Acne Scar Delayed Wind Healing Wire Brush 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Katz BE, MacFarlane DE. Atypical facial scarring after isotretinoin therapy in a patient with previous dermabrasion. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:852–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rubenstein R, Roenigk HH Jr, Stegman SJ, Hanke CW. Atypical keloids after dermabrasion in patients taking isotretinoin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;15:280–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moy RL, Moy LS, Bennett RB, et al. Systemic isotretinoin: effects on dermal wound healing in a rabbit ear model in vivo. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990;16:1142–1146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hevia O, Nemeth AJ, Taylor JR. Tretinoin accelerates healing after trichloroacetic acid chemical peel. Arch Dermatol 1991;127:678–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harmon CB. How does skin respond to abrasive resurfacing. In: Colemen W, Lawrence N, eds. Skin resurfacing. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998:89–96.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collawn SS. Occlusion following laser resurfacing promotes reepithelialization and wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:2180–2189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pinski JB. Dressings for dermabrasion: occlusive dressings and wound healing. Cutis 1986;37:471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mandy SH. Tretinoin in the preoperative and postoperative management of dermabrasion. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;15:878–879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brody HJ. Variations and comparisons in medium depth chemical peeling. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989;25:953–936.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brody HJ. Chemical peeling and resurfacing. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997:109–110.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Monheit GD. The Jessner’s + TCA peel: a medium depth chemical peel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989;15:945–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coleman WP, Futrell JM. The glycolic and trichloroacetic acid peel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994;20:76–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rubin M. Manual of chemical peels. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1995:120–121.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monheit, GD. Medium-depth chemical peels. Dermatol Clin 2001;19:413–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brody, HJ. Complications of chemical resurfacing. Dermatol Clin 2001;19:427–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swinehart JM. Test spots in dermabrasion and chemical peeling. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990;16:557–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ship AG, Weiss PR. Pigmentation after dermabrasion: an avoidable complication. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:528–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harmon CB. Dermabrasion. Dermatol Clin 2001;19:439–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harmon CB. Dermabrasion. eMedicine. Available at: www. emedicine.com/derm/topic744.htm. Accessed August 16, 2007.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raulin C, Greve B, Warncke Sh, Gundogan C. Excimer laser. Treatment of iatrogenic hypopigmentation following skin resurfacing. Hautarzt 2004;55:746–748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friedman PM, Geronemus RG. Use of the 308-nm excimer laser for postresurfacing leukoderma. Arch Dermatol 2001;137:824–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brackup AB. Combined cervicofacial rhytidectomy and laser skin resurfacing. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;18:24–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park GC, Wiseman JB, Hayes DK. The evaluation of rhytidectomy flap healing after CO2 laser resurfacing in a pig model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:590–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cruz NI, Korchin L. Inhibition of human keloid fibroblast growth by isotretinoin and triamcinolone acetonide in vitro. Ann Plast Surg 1994;33:401–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hein R, Mensing H, Muller PK, Braun-Falco O, Krieg T. Effect of vitamin A and its derivatives on collagen production and chemtactic response of fibroblasts. Br J Dermatol 1984;111:37–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Okan G, Nouri K, Trent JS, Barbarulo AM, Rendon M. Delayed wound healing after laser resurfacing. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:93–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Quaedvlieg PJ, Ostertag JU, Krekels GA, Neumann HA. Delayed wound healing after three different treatments for widespread actinic keratosis on the atrophic bald scalp. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:1052–1056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Svedman C, Agner T, Esmann J. Delayed healing after CO2 laser resurfacing. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2003;5:183–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Milner SM. Acetic acid to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa in superficial wounds and burns [letter]. Lancet 1992;340:61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dmytryshyn JR. Chemical face peel complicated by toxic shock syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;109:170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    LoVerme WE, Drapkin MS, Courtiss GH, et al. Toxic shock syndrome after chemical face peel. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:115–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Botta SA, Straith RE, Goodvin HH. Cardiac arrhythmias in phenol face peeling: a suggested protocol for prevention. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1988;12:115–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Truppman F, Ellenberry J. The major electrocardiographic changes during chemical face peeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;63:44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beeson WH. The importance of cardiac monitoring in superficial and deep chemical peeling. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1987;13:949–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Litton C, Trinidad G. Complications of chemical face peeling as evaluated by a questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67:738–744.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klein DR, Little JH. Laryngeal edema as a complication of chemical peel. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;71:419–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Harmon
    • 1
  • Betty Davis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Arizona Medical ClinicSun City WestUSA

Personalised recommendations