Resonance Behavior of a Dielectric Target in a Half-Space Using the CNR (Complex Natural Resonance) Method

  • S. K. Padhi
  • N. V. Shuley

Due to the advent of short-pulse technology (UWB), there has been a considerable amount of interest shown in the application of the transient or impulse response of a radar target. A typical application for such a system is the use of an UWB illuminating pulse in ground penetrating radar (GPR). However, the detection and identification of buried and subsurface objects still remains a difficult problem, as there is no single sensor or diagnostic tool which can provide sufficient information about the object. The singularity expansion method (SEM) has been used for a long time in the detection and recognition of targets in free space. Whilst this method is usually used to represent the scattered signal from the object in terms of a sum of complex exponentials, it also contains the impulse response of the system which can be obtained via a deconvolution process if the incident signal is known. A similar methodology is very popular in GPR systems in the tracking and identification of buried landmines. Although the resonance behavior of the target occurs in the late time portion of the transient signal, both early and late time portions of the signature are useful for extracting the features of the target. We primarily focus on the late time response of the target as it contains target specific information

The primary objective of this research work is to detect and identify a dielectric target buried below a homogeneous half-space from the backscattered time domain signature. It is well known that the transient scattering of electromagnetic waves from a conducting or dielectric target contains information about the resonance behavior of the target itself as quantified by the complex poles or complex natural resonances (CNR) of the target. The CNRs are theoretically aspect independent, depending only on the shape and electrical properties of the target such as permittivity and conductivity. For a target embedded below an interface, the transient response of target itself can be recovered from the system response using a deconvolution technique. Many deconvolution techniques are described and applied in radar signal processing and image processing fields both in the time domain and frequency domain. However, the time domain approach is found to be superior compared to current frequency domain approaches. Similarly, there are many techniques for extracting the CNRs and, in this context; we use the matrix pencil method to extract the poles from the late time impulse response of target.


Impulse Response Ground Penetrate Radar Finite Difference Time Domain Matrix Pencil Resonance Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5 References

  1. 1.
    E.J. Rothwell, and W. Sun, “Time Domain Deconvolution of Transient Radar Data”, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag, 38 (4), 470-475 (1990).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.E. Baum, “On the Convergence and Numerical Sensitivity of the SEM Pole Series in Early Time Scattering Response”, Electromagnetics, (1), 209-228 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.W. Pearson & R. Roberson, “The Extraction of the Singularity Expansion Description of a Scatterer from Sampled Transient Surface Current Response”, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, 28 (2), 182-190 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.S. Cho and J.T. Cordaro, “Calculation of the SEM Parameters from the Transient Response of a Thin Wire”, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 28 (6), 921-924 (1980)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.C. Chen and L.J. Peters, “Buried Unexploded Ordnance Identification via Complex Natural Resonances’, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 45 (11), 1645-1654 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.K. Sarkar and O. Pereira, “Using the Matrix Pencil Method To Estimate the Parameters of a sum of Complex Exponentials”, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 37 (1), 48-55 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.K. Padhi, N.V. Shuley, H.S. Lui and S. Crozier, “Time domain characterization of dielectric target in a half-space using complex natural resonance method”, Proceeding of EMC Zurich-2006, 109-112, (2006).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Marin, “Natural-mode representation of transient scattering from rotationally symmetric bodies”, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag, 22 (2), 266-274 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F.I. Tseng and T.K. Sarkar, “Experimental Determination of Resonant Frequencies by Transient Scattering from Conducting Spheres & Cylinders”, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, 32 (9), 914-918 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.I Tseng and T.K. Sarkar, “Deconvolution of the Impulse Response of a conducting Sphere by the Conjugate Gradient Method”, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag, 35 (1), 105-110 (1987).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Padhi
    • 1
  • N. V. Shuley
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ITEEUniversity of QueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations