Correction of Time-Domain Data in Special Cases Where the Inverse Transfer Functions are Analytic Time Domain Operators

  • Carl E. Baum

In processing of electromagnetic scattering data associated with an incident broadband pulse, there is the problem of removing the filtering of this data by the radar antenna(s), the characteristics of the incident pulse, and other electronic equipment (such as directional couplers). One approach to this problem is to construct, transfer functions (frequency domain) corresponding to these various factors. Then by use of numerical Fourier transforms one transforms the radar data, divides by the transfer functions and numerically inverse Fourier transforms to obtain the delta-function response of the target

One of the advantages of looking at the delta-function response is the separation of the target response from that of other scatterers (clutter) by looking only at a time window corresponding to the time of return of the target signal. Such time separation is corrupted by the temporal convolution corresponding to the transfer functions mentioned above. There is also the inevitable problem of noise in the data as well. This can affect the accuracy of the deconvolution required by making the above transfer functions correspond as closely as practical to single delta functions in time (i.e., minimum dispersion)

An alternate approach, applicable in some cases, is to use analytic deconvolution directly in the time domain. This applies to the cases where the inverse of the transfer functions mentioned above can be written analytically in the time domain, and where the form that the deconvolution takes is relatively simple, This paper explores a few such cases.


Transfer Function Directional Coupler Inverse Fourier Transform Analytic Deconvolution Radar Antenna 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C. E. Baum,“Coupled Transmission Lines as a Time-Domain Directional Coupler”, Sensor and Simulation Note 451, October 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. E. Baum and E. G. Farr, “Impulse Radiating Antennas”, pp. 139-147, in H. L. Bertoni et al (eds.), Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics, Plenum Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. E. Baum, E. G. Farr, and D. V. Giri, “Review of Impulse-Radiating Antennas”, ch. 16, pp. 403-439, in W. R. Stone (ed.), Review of Radio Science 1996-1999, Oxford U. Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. V. Giri and C. E. Baum, “Reflector IRA Design and Boresight Temporal Waveforms”, Sensor and Simulation Note 365, February 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. G. Farr and C. E. Baum, “A Simple Model of Small-Angle TEM Horns”, Sensor and Simulation Note 340, May 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl E. Baum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations