Screening at the Workplace and Female Employees

  • Elena Riza
  • Athena Linos


Cervical Cancer Cancer Screening Positive Predictive Value Screening Program Breast Cancer Screening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen JD, Stoddard AM, Mays J, Sorensen G (2001) Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman study. Am J Public Health, 91, 584–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Cancer Society (2007) Radiation exposure and cancer. In: /docroot/PED/content/PER_1_eX_Radiation_Exposure_and_Cancer.asp.Google Scholar
  3. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (1994) Code of ethical conduct. J Occup Med, 29, 28Google Scholar
  4. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine: Genetic Screening in the workplace, Scholar
  5. American Medical Association (1991) Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Use of genetic testing by employers- JAMA, 226, 1827–30Google Scholar
  6. Andreason A (1995) Marketing social change: Changing behaviour to promote health, social development and the environment. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Arbyn M, Van Oyen H, Lynge E, Mickshe M (2001) European Consensus on cancer screening should be applied urgently by health ministers. BMJ, 323, 396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashmore JP, Krewski D, Ziellinski JM, Jiang H, Semenciw R, Band PR (1998) First analysis and Occupational radiation exposure based on the National Dose Registry of Canada. Am J Epidemiol 148, 564–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura S (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. British Medical Association (2005) Population screening and genetic resting, http://www.bma.orgGoogle Scholar
  11. Broeders M, Codd M, Nyström L, Ascunce N, Riza E (2000) Epidemiological guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening. In: European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Luxembourg 3rd edition (ISBN 92-894-1145-7)Google Scholar
  12. Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA (1997) American Cancer Society Guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin, 112, 594–642Google Scholar
  13. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM (year?) Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in U.S. women. Am J Public Health 1003, 83, 53–60.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell M, Tessaro I, DeVellis B, Benedict S, Kelsey K, Belton L, Sanhuesa A (2002) Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: Health Works for Women. Prev Med, 34, 313–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canadian Cancer Society (2004), ( Scholar
  16. Cancer Research UK (2007), Scholar
  17. Commission of the European Communities (2003) Proposal for a council recommendation on cancer screening, Brussels 5.5.2003 COM 2003/0093 (CNS), Scholar
  18. Day NE, Williams DRR, Khaw KT (1989) Breast cancer screening programs: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer 59,954–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dos Santos Silva I (1999) Cancer epidemiology: Principles and methods. IARC Press, Lyon, France, pp. 355Google Scholar
  20. European Commission-Public Health Overview of Health Policy - The state of women’s health in the European Union, Scholar
  21. Ferlay I, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P (2007). Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Annual Oncology 18, 581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lerman C, McGovern Gorchov P (1992) Factors influencing acceptance of mammography: implications for enhancing worksite cancer control. Am J Health Promot, 7(1), 28–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gochfeld M (1992) Medical surveillance and screening at the workplace: complementary preventive strategies. Environ Res 59, 67–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grazzini G, Cecchini S, Bartoli D, Ciatto S (1989) Pap smear screening at the workplace. Am J Public Health, 79(11), 1570–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Halperin WE, Ratcliffe J, Frazier TM, Wilson L, Becker SP, Schulte PA. Medical screening in the workplace (1986) J Occup Med, 28,547–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hart AR, Glover N, Howick-Baker J, Mayberry JF (2003) An industry based approach to colorectal cancer screening in an asymptomatic population. Postgrad Med, 79, 646–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes RB, Yin SN, Dosemeci M, et al. (1996) Mortality among benzene-exposed workers in China. Environ Health Persp 104, 1349–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holmquist ND (2000) Revisiting the effect of the Pap test in cervical cancer. Am J Public Health, 90, 620–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hutchinson GB (1960) Evaluation of preventive services. J Chron Dis, 11, 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. International Agency for Research on Cancer (1987) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, Supplement 7. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC monographs Vols 1 to 42. IARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
  31. International Labour Organisation (1997) Protection of workers’ personal data. An ILO code of practice. Geneva, Switzerland. International agency for Research on Cancer. Press Release No 174, 7 February 2007. New European cancer figures. World cancer agency says major efforts needed towards prevention in Europe, http://www.iarc.fc/ENG/Press_Releases/pr174a.htmlGoogle Scholar
  32. International Labour Organisation (1998) Technical and Ethical Guidelines for Workers’ Health Surveillance. Occupational Safety and Health Series No 72, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Kogevinas M, Maria Anto J, Sunyer J, Tobias A, Kromhaut H, Burney P (1999) Survey Study Group, European Community Respiratory Health. Occupational asthma in Europe and other industrialized areas: a population-based study. Lancet 353, 1750–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Given B, Given CC (1994) Promotion of breast cancer screening in a worksite population. Health Care Women Int, 15, 31–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Feuvre N (1996) Women, Work and Employment in Europe: Features of Women’s Employment in Europe-Universite de Toulouse-Le Mirail-France; ( science/xantippa/wee/wee22.html)Google Scholar
  36. Mayer JA, Jones JA, Eckhart LE, Haliday J, Bartholomew S, Slymen DJ, Hovell MF (1993) Evaluation of a worksite mammography program. Am J Prev-Med, 9(4), 244–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Meissner HI, Smith RA, Rimer BK, Wilson KM, Rakowski W, Vernon SW, Briss PA. Promoting cancer screening: learning from experience. Cancer Supplement 22 July 2004 (http://www/ Scholar
  38. National Institutes of Health - National Cancer Institute (2007), Scholar
  39. National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature (1993) Genetic Testing and Genetic Screening. Georgetown University, Scholar
  40. Navasumrit P, Chanvaivit S, Intarasunanont P, Arayasiri M, Lauhareungpanya N, Parnlob V, Settachan D, Ruchirawat M (2005) Environmental and occupational exposure to benzene in Thailand. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 153–154, 75–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Official Journal of the European Union. (year?) Cancer Plan 1987–1989. C50, 26, 2Google Scholar
  42. OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2007) Medical surveillance guidelines for benzene. Standard Number 1910.1028 App CGoogle Scholar
  43. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Schouten J (2001) European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening (3rd ed) Brussels European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  44. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1982) Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory Res Pract, 19, 276–288Google Scholar
  45. Rimer BK, Meissner H, Breen N, Legler J, Coyne CA (2001) Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In Schneiderman N, Speers MA, Silva JM, Tomes H, Gentry JH (Eds.), Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health (pp. 177–201). Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Riza E, Linos A (2001) Introduction to screening In European Commission-DG for Education and Culture “Screening for data managers” (pp. 7–8) Educational manual from Leonardo da Vinci Program Vocational Training and Educational Tool Development for data managers in Screening Programmes (TRENDS). Project number DG XXII EL/98/2/05191/PI/II.1.1.a/ FPC (1999–2001)Google Scholar
  47. Rosenstock I, Kirscht J (1974) The Health Belief Model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr,2, 470–473Google Scholar
  48. Schrammel P, Griffiths RI, Griffiths CB (1998) A workplace breast cancer screening program. Costs and components. AAOHN J 46(11), 523–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Snyder C, Schrmmel PN, Griffiths CB, Griffiths RI (1998) Prostate cancer screening in the workplace. Employer costs. AAOHN J, 46(8), 379–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW Day NE, Gad A, Grontoft O (1992) Update on the Swedish two-country program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 30,187–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Thrornton J, Chamberlain J (1989) Cervical screening in the workplace. J-Public-Health, 11(4), 290–98Google Scholar
  52. Tilley BC, Vernon SW, Myers R, Glanz K, Lu M, Hirst K, Kristal AR (1999) The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program. Prev Med, 28(3), 276–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1989, 2003). Making health communication programs work, NCI, NIHGoogle Scholar
  54. Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC, Li S (2001) Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biom Prev, 10, 35–43Google Scholar
  55. World Economic Forum (2006) New Toolkit protecting from tuberculosis. http://www.weforum.orgGoogle Scholar
  56. World Health Organization (2004) Gender, Health and Work. Geneva: Department of Gender, Women and Health (GWH), Scholar
  57. World Health Organisation (2007) Initiative for Vaccine Research. Human Papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer, Scholar
  58. World Health Organization (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease. InWilson JMG, Junger G (eds) Public Health papers 34. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Riza
  • Athena Linos

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations