Advertisement

Conceptualizing Virtual Collaborative Work

Towards an Empirical Framework
  • Michael A. D’Eredita
  • Michael S. Nilan
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 236)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to define the phenomena associated with virtual collaborative work from both a cognitive and social cognitive perspective. The authors put forth an approach that assumes all people are natural sense-makers, sense-givers and organizers. The authors posit that the collaborative work we observe within both informal (ad hoc teams or communities) and formal (organizational) environments derives from fundamental, ubiquitous cognitive and social behavior intimately tied to context-specific problems or situations. The paper begins by challenging the need to re-define terms like “virtual” and “team” in a manner which works to subtly shift the focus of study from “proximal vs. distributed” to the more fruitful “fundamental behavior vs. technological constraints.” The paper then presents a framework for virtual collaborative work and discusses its implications on issues related to teams, leadership, creativity, and the design and use of information technology.

Keywords

Virtual Environment Collaborative Work Virtual Team Technological Constraint Simulator Sickness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Pausch, T. Crea and M. Conway, A Literature Survey for Virtual Environments: Military Flight Simulator Visual Systems and Simulator Sickness, Presence 3(1), 344–363 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Wenger, Communities of Practice (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. D. DeSanctis and P.R. Monge, Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations, Organization Science 693–703 (1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Lipnack and J. Stamps, Virtual Teams (John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Maznevski and K.M. Chuoba, Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness, Organization Science 473–492 (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Drucker, A Century of Social Transformation — Emergence of a Knowledge Society, in: The Essential Drucker, edited by P. Drucker (Harper Collins, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.J.G. Gersick, Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development, Academy of Management Journal 31(1), 9–41 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Jarvenpaa and D.E. Leidner, Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Organization Science 10(6), 791–815 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.R. Hackman, The Design of Work Teams, in: Handbook of Organizational Behavior, edited by J. W. Lorsch (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1987), pp. 315–342.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Nonaka, A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science 5(1), 14–37 (1994).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Senge, Fifth Discipline: Theory and Practice of the Learning Organization (Douleday, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Tuckman, Developmental Sequence in Small Groups, Psychological Bulletin 63, 384–399 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.J. Zaccaro, A.L. Rittman, and M. Marks, Team Leadership, The Leadership Quarterly 451–483 (2001).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.S. Kim, A Theoretical Explanation of Collective Life: Coorienting and Communicating, in: Communication: A Different Kind of Horse Race — Essays Honoring Richard F. Carter, edited by B. Dervin, S.H. Chaffee and L. Foreman-Wernet (Hampton Press, Inc., Cresskill, NJ, 2003) pp. 117–134.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Horsky and P. Nelson, Evaluation of Salesforce Size and Productivity through Efficient Frontier Benchmarking, Marketing Science 14(4), 301–320 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.E. Weick and K.H. Roberts, Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks, Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 357–381 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M.A. D’Eredita and C. Chau, Coaching from Afar: How Ubiquitous Information Technology Was Used to Develop a Successful Semi-virtual Team, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 3(2), (2005).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W.R. Scott, Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (5th Ed) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Dervin, An Overview of Sense-making Rresearch: Concepts, Methods and Results, paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX, May, (1983).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. E. Weick, Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks, California, 1993).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.A. D’Eredita and C. Barreto, How Does Tacit Knowledge Proliferate? An episode-based Perspective, Organization Studies 27, 1821–1841 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.S. Brown and P. Duguid, The Social Life of Information (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2000).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. ØSterlund, Learning Across Contexts: An Ethnographic Study of Salespeople’s Learning at Work, Skriftserie for Psykologisk Institut. 21:1, Aarhus University Press (1996).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.F. Carter, Discontinuity and Communication, paper presented at the East-West Institute on Communication Theory from Eastern and Western Perspective, Honolulu, HI, (1980).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.S. Taylor, Value-added Processes in Information Systems (Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1986).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M.S. Nilan, Cognistive Space: Using Virtual Reality for Large Information Resource Management Problems, Journal of Communication 42(4), 115–135 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D.A. Gioia and K. Chittipeddi, Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation, Strategic Management Journal 12:433–338 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. Dervin, B., Communication Gaps and Inequities: Moving Toward a Reconceptualization, in: Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin, edited by B. Dervin and L. Foreman-Wernet (Hampton Press, Inc., Cresskil, NJ. 2003), pp 17–46.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M.S. Nilan and M.A. D’Eredita, Organizations as Virtual Communities: A Sense-making Approach for Uniting Knowledge Consumers and Knowledge Workers, International Journal of Web Based Communities 1(3), 262–271 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Kaplan, The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science (Chandler, San Francisco, 1964).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P.L. Berger and T. Luckman, The Social Construction of Reality (Doubleday, Garden City, NJ, 1966).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Jakobson, Essais de Linguistique Generate: Volume 1, Foundations du Language (Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1963).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. Yoon and M.S. Nilan, Toward a Reconceptualization of Information Seeking Research: Focus on the Exchange of Meaning, Information Processing & Management 35, 871–890 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    T.W. Malone and K. Crowston, The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination, ACM Computing 3.201 Surveys, 87–119, (1994).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K.E. Weike and K.M. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2001).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M.S. Nilan and A. Mundkur, Structuring Virtuality: A User-based Example for e-Commerce, Proceedings of the International Federation for Information Processing, Working Group 8.2 on Information Systems and Organizations and 9.5 on Virtuality and Society (Portland, Or, July 2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. D’Eredita
    • 1
  • Michael S. Nilan
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Information StudiesSyracuse UniversitySyracuse
  2. 2.School of Information StudiesSyracuse UniversitySyracuse

Personalised recommendations