The Practice of e-Science and e-Social Science

Method, Theory, and Matter
  • Susan V. Scott
  • Will Venters
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 236)


Grid technologies are widely regarded as important innovations for drawing together distributed knowledge workers into virtual communities. After reviewing the developments in e-science, we examine the emergence of e-social science and the potential impact on scientific discovery. Grids are currently in a key developmental phase during which the field of information systems can bring significant insight. We consider what is new about the Grid phenomena and discuss the issues raised by this particular approach to the virtualization of research practices. Our analysis is organized into three subsections that focus on: developments in e-social science research methods; the theoretical issues involved in pursuing an e-social science agenda; as well as the status and nature of the research materials that it gives rise to in information systems.


Research Practice Virtual Organization Grid Technology Information System Research Document Type Definition 


  1. 1.
    M.B. Watson-Manheim, K. Crowston, and M. Chudoba, Discontinuities and Continuities: A New Way to Understand Virtual Work, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.L. Star and K. Ruhleder, Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces, Information Systems Research 7(1), 111–134 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    M.H. Olson and S.A. Bly, The Portland Experience: A Report on a Distributed Research Group, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34(2), 211–228 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    T.A. Finholt, Collaboratories as a New Form of Scientific Organization, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12(1), (2003).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Roberta Lamb and Elizabeth Davidson, The New Computing Archipelago: Intranet Islands of Practice, Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, in: Proceedings of International Federation of Information Processing, Working Group 8.2, edited by R. Baskerville, J. Stage, and J.I. DeGross, Aalborg, Denmark, (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    T. Hey and A. Trefethen, The UK e-Science Core Programme and the Grid, Future Generation Computer Systems 18, 1017–1031, (2002).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    P.A. David, Towards a Cyberinfrastructure for Enhances Scientific Collaboration: Providing Its’ soft’ Foundations may be the Hardest Part (Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    M. Merz, Embedding Digital Infrastructure in Epistemic Culture, in: New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science, edited by C. Hine (Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2006) pp 99–119.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    I. Foster and C. Kesselman, The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    K. Knorr-Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    J. Hlistova, How is the Particle Physics Community Shaping the Grid in the UK? (MSc Dissertation, Department of Information Systems. London School of Economics, London, 2004).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    S. Woolgar, P. Wouters, and P. Schroeder (Eds.) Promise and Practice in Data Sharing, NIVI-KNAW, Amsterdam, (2003).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    D. Rogulin, F. Estrella, T. Hauer, et al., A Grid Information Infrastructure for Medical Image Analysis, presented as DiDaMIC Workshop, (2004).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    I. Foster, C. Kesselman, and S. Tuecke, The Anatomy of the Grid, International Journal of Supercomputer Applications (2001).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    S. Woolgar and C. Coopmans, Virtual Witnessing in a Virtual Age: A Prospectus for Social Studies of e-Science, in: New Infrastructure for Knowledge Production, edited by C. Hine, (Information Science Publishing, Hershey, 2006), pp 1–25.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    I. Chompalov, J. Genuth, and W. Shrum, The Organization of Scientific Collaborations, Research Policy 31, 749–767 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    W. Venters and T. Cornford, Introducing Pegasus: An Ethnographic Research Project Studying the Use of Grid Technologies by the UK Particle Physics Community, Second International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester, UK, (2006).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    J. Fry and M. Thelwall, Using Domain Analysis and Organisational Theory to Understand e-Science Sustainability, National e-Social Science Conference, Manchester, (2006); Scholar
  19. 18.
    S. Woolgar, Social Shaping Perspectives on e-Science and e-Social Science: the Case for Research Support, a consultative study for the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). (2003); Scholar
  20. 19.
    M. Chalmers, Replayer: Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Ubicomp Evaluation Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on e-Social Science Manchester, 29–30 June, (2006).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    J. Maitland and M. Chalmers, Collaborative e-Health Systems, working paper, University of Glasgow, UK (March 1, 2007); Scholar
  22. 21.
    B. Brown, Using Wikis in Collaborative Ethnography, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester, 29–30 June, (2006).Google Scholar
  23. 3.
    B.H. Kwasnik and K. Crowston, Introduction to the Special Issue: Genres of Digital Documents, Information Technology & People 18(2), 76–88 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 4.
    H.C. Barrett, Create Your Own Electronic Portfolio: Using Off-the-Shelf Software to Showcase Your Own or Student Work, Learning and Leading with Technology 27(7), 14–21, (2000).Google Scholar
  25. 5.
    W.J. Orlikowski and J.J. Baroudi, Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions, Information Systems Research 2(1), 1–28, (1991).Google Scholar
  26. 6.
    H.K. Klein and M.D. Myers, A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MS Quarterly 23(1), 67–94, (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 7.
    T.A. Schwandt, Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry, in: Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Sage, London, 1994) pp. 118–137.Google Scholar
  28. 8.
    B. Kaplan, D.P. Truex, D. Wastell, A.T. Wood-Harper and J.I. DeGross, Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2004).Google Scholar
  29. 9.
    A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, M.A. Fuller and C. Schneider, Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems, Management Information Systems Quarterly 30(1), 1–13, (2006).Google Scholar
  30. 10.
    A. Reckwitz, Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory 5(2), 243–263, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 11.
    W. Orlikowski, Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing, Organization Science 11(4), 404–428, (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 12.
    T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1970).Google Scholar
  33. 13.
    E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1998).Google Scholar
  34. 14.
    S. Kelly and M. Jones, Toward a Distinctive ‘Praxiological’ Perspective on ICT-enabled Organizational Innovation, working paper presented at the Organization Studies Workshop on the Practice Turn, Greece, (2006).Google Scholar
  35. 15.
    G. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences (MIT Press, Boston, MA, 1999).Google Scholar
  36. 16.
    R.L. Ackoff, The Future of Operational Research is Past, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(2), 93–104, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 17.
    G. Morgan, Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1983).Google Scholar
  38. 18.
    G. Burrell and G. Morgan, Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis (Heinemann, London, 1979).Google Scholar
  39. 19.
    J. Grudin, Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organization of Organizational Interfaces, Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, Portland, Oregon, 85–93, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan V. Scott
    • 1
  • Will Venters
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Systems Group, Department of ManagementLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations