Advertisement

Learning Triggers in Virtual Groups

The Case of the Apache Web Server
  • Hala Annabi
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 236)

Abstract

Learning is a critical capability for virtual group effectiveness. The objective of this study is to understand when learning occurs. Once we understand when learning occurs we are better able to stimulate learning to enhance the effectiveness of virtual groups. Additionally, understanding the nature of learning triggers and the results they produce informs how we may achieve desired learning outcomes. This study develops a framework to explain, and empirically studies, when learning occurs in virtual groups. The study employed a single, embedded, qualitative case study designed to study learning triggers in an Open Source Software project. Findings suggest that learning occurs ensuing learning triggers. Learning triggers vary in type and source. The type and source of learning triggers effects whether learning occurs in the group and the type of learning outcomes the trigger produces.

Keywords

Open Source Software Virtual Team External Trigger Global Software Development Shared Mental Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Kock, Benefits for Virtual Organizations from Distributed Group, Communications of the ACM 43(11), pp. 107–112 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.A. Guzzo and G.P. Shea, Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations, in: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA., 1992), pp. 269–313.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.F. Drucker, Management’s New Paradigms, Forbes, October 5, 1998, pp. 152–177.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.W. Malone and R.J. Laubacher, The Dawn of the e-Lance Economy, Harvard Business Review 76(5), pp. 144–152, (1998).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.D. Herbsleb and D. Montra, Global Software Development, IEEE Software 18(2), pp. 16–20 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Bélanger and R. Collins, Distributed Work Arrangements: A Research Framework, The Information Society 14(2), pp. 137–152 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.L. Jarvenpaa and D.E. Leidner, Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Organization Science 10(6), pp. 791–815 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.E. Kraut, et al., Coordination and Virtualization: The Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships, Organization Science 10(6), pp. 722–740 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Carmel and R. Agarwal, Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development, IEEE Software 18(2), pp. 22–29 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.S. de Souza, Asynchronous Organizations for Multi-Algorithm Problems, in: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (Carnegie-Mellon University, 1993) (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Curtis, D. Walz, and J.J. Elam, Studying the Process of Software Design Teams, in: Proceedings of the 5th international Software Process Workshop on Experience with Software Process Models, (IEEE Computer Society Press, Kennebunkport, Maine, 1990), pp 52–53.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.A. Garvin, Barriers and Gateways to Learning, in: Education for Judgment: The Art of Discussion Leadership, edited by C.R. Christensen, D.A. Garvin, and A. Sweet (Harvard Business School Press: Boston, 1991), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.W. Maier, C. Prange, and L. Rosenstiel, Psychological Perspective of Organizational Learning, in: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, edited by M. Dierkes, et al., (Oxford Press: New York, 2001), pp. 14–34.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Random House, London, 1990).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Lin and S. Lin, A Conceptual Model for Virtual Organizational Learning, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 11(3), pp. 155–178 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Robey, H.M. Khoo, and C. Powers, Situated-learning in Cross-functional Virtual Teams, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 43(1), pp. 51–66 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W.J. Orlikowski, Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing, Organization Science 13(3), pp. 249–273 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Wiegand, What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review 14(4), pp. 490–5 (1996).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Prange, Organizational Learning — Desperately Seeking Theory?, in: Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization, edited by M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, and L. Araujo (Sage, London, 1999), pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Annabi, Moving from Individual Contribution to Group Learning: The Early Years of the Apache Web Server (Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 2005).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C.M. Fiol, Consensus, Diversity, and Learning in Organizations, Organization Science 5(3), pp. 403–420 (1994).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G.P. Huber, Organizational Learning: The Contribution Processes and the Literatures, Organization Science 2(1), pp. 88–115 (1991).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.E. Walton and J.R. Hackman, Groups Under Contrasting Management Strategies, in: Designing Effective Work Groups, edited by P.S.G.A. Associates, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1986), pp. 168–201.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.R. Hackman, The Design of Work Teams, in: The Handbook of Organizational Behavior, edited by J.W. Lorsch, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987), pp. 315–342.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.M. Cyert and J.G. March, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Duncan and A. Weiss, Organizational Learning: Implications for Organizational Design, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1979), pp. 75–123.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Argyris and D. Schön, Organizational Learning, (Addison-Wesley, London, 1978).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. Levitt, and J.G. March, Organizational Learning, Annual Review of Sociology 14, pp. 319–340 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Gladstein, Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 499–517 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R.M. Grant, Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter), pp. 109–122 (1996).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    V. Cangelosi and W.R. Dill, Organizational Learning: Observation Toward a Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly 10(2), pp. 175–203 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    M.C. Fiol and M.A. Lyles, Organizational Learning, Academy of Management Review 10(4), pp. 803–813 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A.S. Miner and S.J. Mezias, Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning, Organization Science 7(1), pp. 88–99 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A.P. Hare, Handbook of Small Group Research, (The Free Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Apache Software Foundation, (April 25, 2005), http://www.apache.org.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M.B. Miles and A. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    R.T. Fielding, Shared Leadership in the Apache Project, Communications of the ACM 42(4), pp. 42–43 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    T. Anderson, et al., Assessing Teaching Presence in Computer Conferencing Transcripts, Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network 5(2), (2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hala Annabi
    • 1
  1. 1.The Information SchoolUniversity of WashingtonSeattle

Personalised recommendations