Abstract
There is a long tradition of research on work in teams and their increasingly important use as an approach to organizational design. While the implicit assumption has been that individuals work on one team at a time, many individuals are now being asked to juggle several projects and their associated multiple team memberships (MTM) simultaneously. This creates a set of interesting opportunities and challenges for organizations that choose to structure work in this way. In this paper, we review the limited existing research on MTM work. We then present the results of a survey documenting the prevalence of MTM work and the findings from a pilot interview study suggesting a number of challenges, benefits, and enabling conditions associated with MTM work. We discuss the implications for managers working in MTM environments as well as for scholars of teams and, in doing so we describe what we see as key items on the agenda for future research on this topic.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
S.A. Mohrman, S.G. Cohen, and A.M.J. Mohrman, Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work (Jossey-Bass, New York, 1995).
G. DeSanctis and M.S. Poole, Transitions in Teamwork in New Organizational Forms, in: Advances in Group Processes, edited by B. Markovsky et al., (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1997), pp. 157–76.
A. Richman, K. Noble, and A. Johnson, When the Workplace is Many Places: The Extent and Nature of Off-Site Work Today (WFD Consulting, Watertown, MA, 2002).
T.W. Malone, The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style and Your Life (HBS Press, Boston, MA, 2004).
M. Hobday, The Project-based Organization: An Ideal Form for Managing Complex Products and Systems, Research Policy 29(7), 871–893 (2000).
J.M. Utterback, The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm, Academy of Management Journal 14(1), 75–88 (1971).
M. B. Watson-Manheim and F. Belanger, Support for Communication-based Work Processes in Virtual Work, e-Service Journal 1(3), 61–82 (2002).
A. Majchrzak, R. E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King, and S.L. Ba, Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-supported Inter-organizational Virtual Team, MIS Quarterly 24(4), 569–600 (2000).
S.W.J. Kozlowski and D.R. Ilgen, Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7(3), 77–124 (2006).
R.A. Guzzo and M.W. Dickson, Teams in Organizations: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness, Annual Review of Psychology 47, 307–338 (1996).
E. Sundstrom, K.P. DeMeuse, and D. Futrell, Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness, American Psychologist 45(2), 120–133 (1990).
H. Arrow, J.E. McGrath, and J.L. Berdahl, Small Groups As Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation (Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001).
S. Leroy and L. Sproull. When Team Work Means Working on Multiple Teams: Examining the Impact of Multiple Team Memberships, presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA (2004).
A. Zika-Viktorsson, P. Sundstrom, and M. Engwall, Project Overload: An Exploratory Study of Work and Management in Multi-project Settings, International Journal of Project Management 24(5), 385–394 (2006).
M. Hoegl and K. Weinkauf, Managing Task Interdependencies in Multi-team Projects: A Longitudinal Study, Journal of Management Studies 42(6), 1287–1308 (2005).
L.A. DeChurch and M.A. Marks, Leadership in Multiteam Systems, Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 311–329 (2006).
M.A. Marks, L.A. Dechurch, J.E. Mathieu, F.J. Panzer, and A. Alonso, Teamwork in Multiteam Systems, Journal of Applied Psychology 90(5), 964–971 (2005).
J.E. Mathieu, M.A. Marks, and S.J. Zaccaro, Multiteam Systems, in: International Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, edited by N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, and C. Viswesvaran (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001), pp. 289–313.
T.R. Browning, Integrative Mechanisms for Multiteam Integration: Findings from Five Case Studies, Systems Engineering 1, 95–112 (1998).
T.R. Browning, Designing System Development Projects for Organizational Integration, Systems Engineering 2(4), 217–225 (1999).
E.W. Hans, W. Herroelen, R. Leus, and G. Wullink, A Hierarchical Approach to Multi-project Planning Under Uncertainty, Omega 35(5), 563–577 (2007).
M. Engwall and A. Jerbrant, The Resource Allocation Syndrome: The Prime Challenge of Multi-project Management, International Journal of Project Management 21(6), 403–409 (2003).
M. De Maio, R. Verganti, and M. Corso, A Multi-project Management Framework for Product Development, European Journal of Operational Research 78, 178–191 (1994).
J.H. Payne, Management of Multiple Simultaneous Projects: A State of the Art Review, International Journal of Project Management 13, 163–168 (1995).
A.C. Edmondson and S.E. McManus, Methodological Fit in Management Field Research, Academy of Management Review, in press.
B.G. Glaser and A.L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, Chicago, IL, 1967).
K. M. Eisenhardt, Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550 (1989).
A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990).
A.C. Edmondson and I.M. Nembhard, Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits, Journal of Product Innovation Management, in press.
B.L. Kirkman, B. Rosen, C.B. Gibson, P.E. Tesluk, and S.O. McPherson, Five Challenges to Virtual Team Success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc., Academy of Management Executive 16, 67–79 (2002).
C.B. Gibson and S.G. Cohen, eds., Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2003).
C.J. Konig, M. Buhner, and G. Murling, Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are Not, Human Performance, 18, 243–266 (2005).
H.A. Elfenbein, Team Emotional Intelligence: What It Can Mean and How It Can Impact Performance, in: The Link between Emotional Intelligence and Effective Performance, edited by V. Druskat, F. Sala, and G. Mount (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2005).
J.R. Hackman, Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2002).
R. Wageman, Interdependence and Group Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180 (1995).
M.R. Haas, Acquiring and Applying Knowledge in Transnational Teams: The Roles of Cosmopolitans and Locals, Organization Science 17, 367–384 (2006).
K.J. Klein and S.W.J. Kozlowski, eds., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2000).
K.J. Klein and S.W.J. Kozlowski, From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research, Organizational Research Methods 3(3), 211–36 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mortensen, M., Woolley, A.W., O’Leary, M. (2007). Conditions Enabling Effective Multiple Team Membership. In: Crowston, K., Sieber, S., Wynn, E. (eds) Virtuality and Virtualization. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 236. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73024-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-73025-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)