Advertisement

Marketing Environmental Services

  • Amir Heiman
  • Yanhong Jin
  • David Zilberman
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 31)

Abstract

Environmental services (ES) are diverse both in terms of the benefits that they provide, and in terms of potential buyers. This suggests a mixture of institutional arrangements and strategies required to create demand for ES. In some cases, there is an advantage to commoditizing ES and marketing them through large exchanges. In other cases, the ES are unique, and special efforts and patience for finding the appropriate buyers are needed. In all cases, increasing consumer awareness of availability, value, and benefit of ES is important and leads to increased demand. Furthermore, in all cases, buyers have to be assured of product reliability, which requires explicit mechanisms for monitoring, enforcement of contracts, and insurance. The demand from ES can come from governments and industry that may use it as a least-cost approach to solving environmental problems or a source of revenue and consumers who may use ES as a source of direct consumption benefits or altruism of pro-social behavior. Marketing strategies should be targeted for the specific characteristic of needs of various market segments.

Keywords

Environmental Service Improve Water Quality Carbon Credit Market Effort Potential Buyer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akerlof G (1982) Labor contracts as a partial gift exchange. Q J Econ 97:543–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alix-Garcia A, de Janvry A, Sadoulet E (2004) Payments for environmental services: To whom, for what, and how much? Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  3. Babcock BA, Lakshminarayan PG, Wu J, Zilberman D (1996) The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: A study of CRP contracts. Am J Agric Econ 78(4):961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becchetti L, Rosati F (2007) Global social preferences and the demand for socially responsible products: Empirical evidence from a pilot study on fair trade consumers. CEIS Tor Vergata – Research Paper Series, 31(91). Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=962488
  5. Bloom PN, Hoeffler S, Keller KL, Basurto Meza CE (2006) How social-cause marketing affects consumer perceptions. Sloan Manag Rev 47(2):49–55.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1975) Polluters’ profits and political response: Direct controls versus taxes. Am Econ Rev 65(1):139–147.Google Scholar
  7. Dawes RM, Thaler RH (1988) Anomalies: Cooperation. J Econ Perspect 2:187–198.Google Scholar
  8. de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Booumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description, and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Econ Dev Cult Chang 32(2):255–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heiman A, McWilliams B, Zilberman D (2001) Demonstrations and money-back guarantees: Market mechanisms to reduce uncertainty. J Bus Res 54:71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Am Econ Rev 76:728–741.Google Scholar
  12. Kotler P, Levy SJ (1969) Broadening the concept of marketing. J Mark 33(1):10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li J (2008) The power of convention: A theory of social preferences. J Econ Behav Organ 65:489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olmstead J, Sunding D, Parker D, Howitt R, Zilberman D (1997) Water marketing in the 90s: Entering the electronic age. Choices (3rd quarter):24–28.Google Scholar
  15. Osterhus TL (1997) Pro-social consumer influence strategies: When and how do they work? J Mark 61(4):16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Price LL, Feick LF, Guskey A (1995) Everyday market helping behavior. J Public Policy Mark 14:255–266.Google Scholar
  17. Rabin M (1997) Psychology and economics. Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 97-251, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am Econ Rev 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
  19. Rausser GC (1982) Political economic markets: PERTs and PESTs in food and agriculture. Am J Agric Econ 64(5):821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Zusman P (1976) The incorporation and measurement of social power in economic models. Int Econ Rev 17(2):447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FAO 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Heiman
    • 1
  • Yanhong Jin
    • 2
  • David Zilberman
    1. 1.Department of Agricultural Economics and ManagementHebrew UniversityRehovotIsrael
    2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

    Personalised recommendations