Advertisement

Afghan Refugee Camp Surveys in Pakistan, 2002

  • James Bell
  • David Nolle
  • Ruth Citrin
  • Fritz Scheuren

Both as professionals and as citizens, the events of the last years have brought about many changes to our view of the world and our engagement in it. This survey was one response to those changes. Its main goal was measuring attitudes on a variety of social, economic, and political issues of the Afghan refugees that were returning to their homeland from Pakistan. Particularly important was learning about their perceptions regarding current circumstances as well as future expectations. From a methodological perspective, trying to obtain a good sample of adult males in the refugee camps posed many challenges and most of the discussion will be focused on those challenges.

Keywords

Design Effect Refugee Camp United Nations High Commissioner Random Half Survey Research Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball P, Betts W, Scheuren F, Dudokovic J, Asher J (2002) Reexamining the correlation between Kosovar killings and refugee flows. American Association for the Advancement of Science, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Birmingham WB, Jahoda G (1955) A pre-election survey in a semi-literate society. Public Opinion Quarterly 19:140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casley DJ, Lury DA (1981) Data collection in developing countries. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitch DJ, Molina Ro, Barrientos T (2000) Weighting of survey data: is the view that such should not be attempted in developing countries reasonable? Proceedings of the section on survey research methods of the American Statistical Association, pp 764–769Google Scholar
  5. Javeline D (1999) Response effects in polite cultures: a test of acquiescence in Kazakhstan. Public Opinion Quarterly 63:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kish L (1965) Survey sampling. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Reed H (2002) Demographic assessment techniques in complex humanitarian emergencies. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Scheuren F (2002). Survey sampling technology in human rights research. Proceedings of the section on government statistics and section on social statistics of the American Statistical Association. Published previously in Amstat News, 306, 77–78. Also available by looking up the social statistics section at the www.amstat.orgGoogle Scholar
  9. Scheuren F(Forth coming) Conducting human rights surveys in conflict Zones. To be presented at the 2008 February Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston.Google Scholar
  10. United Nations (2005) Draft version of household surveys in developing and transition countries: design, implementation and analysis (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/HHsurveys/index.htm, accessed February 24, 2005)Google Scholar
  11. Yansaneh IS, Eltinge JL (2000) Design effect and cost issues for surveys in developing countries. Proceedings of the section on survey research methods of the American Statistical Association, pp 770–775Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Bell
  • David Nolle
  • Ruth Citrin
  • Fritz Scheuren

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations