Abstract
According to Brehm (1966), if a person’s freedom to behave as they choose is threatened in some way, then they will become motivationally aroused to either reestablish the lost freedom, or to ensure that there is no further loss. This hypothetical motivational state is referred to as psychological reactance. While resistance is defined as behavior against compliance, psychological reactance is a motive to behave to recover a lost freedom, and may result in behavior against compliance. It is argued that negative behaviors, which contribute to the poor record of information system implementation, likely contain some element of psychological reactance and that the latter may be brought about by threats directly or indirectly related to the implementation at hand. Therefore, an understanding of the interactions between system implementation, broader contextual influences, such as organizational climate and the formation of reactance, offer an opportunity to base interventions in strategies that avoid or minimize the motive to adopt negative behaviors, and therefore enhance the implementation of information systems in organizational settings.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang, J., and Pavri, F. “A Survey and Critique of the Impacts of Information Technology,” Journal of Information Management (14:2), 1994, pp. 122–133.
Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y-G, and Lee, J-N. “Behavioral Intention Forming in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate,” MIS Quarterly (29:1), 2005, pp. 87–112.
Brehm, J. W. A Theory of Psychological Reactance, New York: Academic Press, 1966.
Brehm, S. S., and Brehm, J. W. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control, New York: Academic Press, 1981.
Broeng, M. “Outside the Comfort Zone,” Logistics (13), 2006, pp. 34–35.
Dake, K. “Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk,” Journal of Social Issues (48:4), 1992, pp. 21–37.
Dear, L. “Negotiated Safety, What You Don’t Know Won’t Hurt You, or Will It?,” Drug and Alcohol Review (14), 1995, pp. 323–329.
Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. “Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use,” Management Science (40:4), 1994, pp. 440–465.
Harvey, J., Erdos, G., Bolam, H., Cox, M. A. A., Kennedy, J. N. P., and Gregory, D. T. “An Analysis of Safety Culture Attitudes in a Highly Regulated Environment,” Work & Stress (16:1), 2002, pp. 18–36.
Lapointe, L., and Rivard, S. “A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation,” MIS Quarterly (29:3), 2005, pp. 461–492.
Marakas, G. M., and Hornick, S. “Passive Resistance Misuse: Overt Support and Covert Recalcitrance in IS Implementation,” European Journal of Information Systems (5), 1996, pp. 2-8–219.
Rivard, S., Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., Pare, G., and Smith, H. A. Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: Solving the Management Puzzle, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004.
Statt, D. A. Psychology and the World of Work, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Matthias, T., Miller, L., Caputi, P., Jayasuriya, R., Willis, D. (2007). Psychological Reactance and Information Systems Adoption. In: McMaster, T., Wastell, D., Ferneley, E., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda. TDIT 2007. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 235. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72803-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72804-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)