Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation

Diversifying the Information Systems Research Agenda
  • Robert D. Galliers
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 235)


This keynote address takes up the conference theme and argues for greater diversification and innovation—in method and topic—in Information Systems research and curricula design. Basing my arguments on my own—and others’—recent critiques of calls for a narrowing of our focus on the information technology artefact and IS design, I will highlight the expanding boundary of the field of Information Systems and what this means for the IS academy in terms of innovation and diversification in our research and teaching.


Information System Research Intellectual Structure Conference Theme Great Diversification British Computer Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alter, S. “The IS Core — XI: Sorting Out the Issues about the Core, Scope, and Identity of the IS Field,” Communications of the AIS (12:41), November 2003, pp. 607–627.Google Scholar
  2. Backhouse, J., Liebenau, J., and Land, F. “On the Discipline of Information Systems,” Journal of Information Systems (now Information Systems Journal) (1:1), January 1991, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
  3. Banville, C., and Landry, M. “Can the Field of MIS be Disciplined?,” Communications of the ACM(32:1), January 1989, pp. January, 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. “Further Reflections on the Identity Crisis,” in J. L. King and K. Lyytinen (eds.), Information Systems: The State of the Field, Chichester: Wiley, 2006, pp. 300–306.Google Scholar
  5. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. “The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Core’s Properties,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), June 2003, pp. 183–194.Google Scholar
  6. Culnan, M. “The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A Co-citation Analysis,” Management Science (32:2), February 1986, pp. 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Culnan, M. “Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980–1985: A Co-citation Analysis,” MIS Quarterly (11:3), September 1987, pp. 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galliers, R. D. “Change as Crisis or Growth? Towards a Transdisciplinary View of Information Systems as a Field of Study: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud’s Call for Returning to the IT Artifact,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (4:6), 2003, pp. 360–376.Google Scholar
  9. Galliers, R. D. “‘Don’t Worry, Be Happy...’: A Post-Modernist Perspective on the Information Systems Domain,” in J. L. King and K. Lyytinen (eds.), Information Systems: The State of the Field, Chichester: Wiley, 2006, pp. 324–331.Google Scholar
  10. Galliers, R. D. “In Search of a Paradigm for Information System Research,” in E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and A. T. Wood-Harper (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  11. Galliers, R. D., Markus, M. L., and Newell, S. (eds.). Exploring Information Systems Research Approaches: Readings and Reflections, Abingdon, Oxford: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Keen, P. G. W. “MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition,” in in E. R. McLean (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia PA, 1980, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
  13. King, J. L., and Lyytinen, K. (eds.). Information Systems: The State of the Field, Chichester: Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  15. Langefors, B. Theoretical Analysis of Information Systems, Philadlphia, PA: Auerbach, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. Lucas, H. “The State of the Information Systems Field,” Communications of the AIS (1:5), 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Markus, M. L. “Thinking the Unthinkable: What Happens If the Is Field as We Know it Goes Away?,” in W. Currie and R. D. Galliers (eds.), Rethinking MIS, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 175–203.Google Scholar
  18. Orlikowski, W., and Iacono, S. “Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research,” Information Systems Research (7:4), 2001, pp. 400–408.Google Scholar
  19. Weber, R. “Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), 2003, pp. iii–xi.Google Scholar
  20. Zani, R. “Blueprint for MIS,” Harvard Business Review, November–December, 1970, pp. 95–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Galliers
    • 1
  1. 1.Bentley CollegeWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations